Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 629

Resilience is the new alpha

Volatility is nothing new for global markets. Investors have long learned to navigate cycles of boom and bust, inflation and disinflation, optimism and fear.

But trade policy — and tariffs in particular — introduces a different kind of risk. It is unpredictable, political, and often enacted suddenly, with little warning for businesses that rely on cross-border supply chains or global customer bases.

This unpredictability has become a recurring feature of the investment landscape in recent times. Tariffs are no longer just economic tools; they are instruments of geopolitical strategy, used by governments to protect industries or assert leverage in negotiations.

For businesses, that means disruption can arrive not from consumer demand or technological change, but from a policy decision made overnight.

For investors, the question is not whether to anticipate every headline, but how to identify the companies that can endure and adapt regardless of policy swings.

Companies with pricing power, flexible supply chains, and strong industry dynamics are not merely weathering this turbulence — they are using it to strengthen their competitive edge. These qualities are what define resilience, and resilience is what ultimately underpins long-term investment success.

Pricing power: Passing costs to customers

Pricing power is the most direct defence against tariffs. Companies with the ability to pass higher costs onto customers protect their profitability and market share. This advantage typically comes from products deemed essential, strong brand loyalty, or contractual structures that guarantee cost recovery.

Consider the HVAC industry. Heating and cooling systems are indispensable, and when they break down, they are replaced. Carrier Global, a leader in the sector, benefits from this reliable replacement cycle. Even in a tariff environment, such businesses can raise prices without losing demand.

Brand loyalty offers another buffer. Apple’s customer base is famously less price-sensitive, giving it more leeway than rivals to absorb tariff-driven price hikes. Luxury brand groups such as Hermès also illustrate the strength of brand equity, with their long wait lists and ability to raise prices with little pushback.

Defense contractors, meanwhile, often operate under “cost-plus” contracts, where governments reimburse rising expenses. Even in fixed-price contracts, renegotiations allow adjustments over time. With defense considered strategically essential, demand remains steady despite shifting costs.

And in supply-constrained markets, pricing power strengthens further. Semiconductor leaders like NVIDIA and Broadcom, producing critical AI chips in tight supply environments, can raise prices to offset tariffs with minimal risk to demand.

Cost absorption: Shielding customers

For other businesses, protecting customers from higher costs may be the smarter strategy. Absorbing tariffs can defend market share and customer loyalty, especially if the disruption is temporary. This approach is most sustainable for companies with strong margins or broad scale.

Companies that operate in the medical device, biotech and pharmaceutical sectors are prominent in this respect, with high-margin models meaning they are well positioned to shoulder cost pressures.

Even in thinner-margin sectors, some companies choose cost absorption as a competitive tactic. For example, Chipotle has pledged not to pass tariffs on Mexican avocados to consumers, prioritising affordability and demand continuity over short-term margins. Walmart and Costco adopt similar strategies, defending their value-driven positioning by weathering temporary shocks themselves.

Supply chain adjustment: Rewiring for resilience

The most adaptable companies are those that can rewire supply chains to reduce exposure to tariffed goods. This often means shifting sourcing to alternative markets, investing in domestic capacity, or building “local-to-local” models where production occurs near the point of consumption.

During the recent US – China trade negotiations, many multinationals diversified production into Southeast Asia and Mexico. Those with global scale and multi-local strategies, such as Siemens, Carrier Global, and Schneider Electric, were able to pivot efficiently. By producing closer to customers, they reduced tariff exposure while retaining global reach.

Companies like Tesla highlight another path: vertical integration. By controlling more of its production process — from batteries to final assembly — and operating gigafactories in both Europe and China, the company reduces reliance on any single market. Its Shanghai plant sources 95% of components locally, insulating it from reciprocal tariff risks.

Industry dynamics: Sector matters

Resilience also varies across industries. Industrials, which typically import low-margin components but add significant value domestically, are less exposed to tariffs than industries heavily dependent on cross-border finished goods. Bulky, high-value products are often produced closer to their markets, limiting tariff sensitivity.

Automakers, by contrast, face greater exposure. Following the imposition of 25% tariffs on imported vehicles and parts, several European and Asian firms temporarily halted U.S. shipments. Shifting production is possible, but duplicating supply chains is costly and time-intensive.

Resilient companies within vulnerable industries are often distinguished by differentiated strategies. Tesla again provides an example: its combination of vertical integration and geographic diversification helps it navigate a sector otherwise highly sensitive to trade shocks.

Lessons for investors

What seems to be increasingly apparent is that tariffs may come and go, but uncertainty is here to stay. Trade policy has evolved into a geopolitical lever, meaning sudden shifts are part of the business environment for the foreseeable future.

For investors, the most effective response is not to react to each headline but to focus on the deeper qualities that allow companies to withstand disruption. Businesses that can defend margins, adjust supply chains, and retain customer loyalty are better placed to compound value over time.

Ultimately, investing is still about patience and perspective. Short-term tariff risks may unsettle markets, but they also reveal the businesses truly built for the long haul.

For those investors focused on building enduring wealth, the lesson is clear: resilience is not just a defensive posture — it is the cornerstone of long-term investing.

 

Matt Reynolds is an Investment Director for Capital Group Australia, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article contains general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Please seek financial advice before acting on any investment as market circumstances can change.

For more articles and papers from Capital Group, click here.

 

  •   17 September 2025
  • 1
  •      
  •   
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.