Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 262

Retail FX: the last bastion of no competition?

With the July school holidays now upon us, many Australians will pack their bags and head overseas to chase the European summer. With this will come the inevitable rush to exchange currency. Unfortunately, Australian consumers often have limited options when it comes to competitive ways to exchange currency. According to Capital Economics, Australians spent over $1 billion in fees and poor exchange rates on their currency exchanges in 2016.

This is a problem that is only set to increase. Australians travel frequently for leisure and business, with Australians travelling internationally on the increase over the last 10 years. About 10 million Australian residents travel overseas each year, for a holiday (59.3%), to visit friends and relatives (23.8%) or for business (8.6%). Furthermore, Australia ranks 10th highest in the world for transferring money overseas, with over US$15 billion (A$17 billion) transferred in 2012.

This problem is magnified for high net worth (HNW) Australians, as this demographic both travels more often and exchanges currencies more frequently. According to data from RFi Research, the majority of HNWs travel overseas at least once a year, with younger HNWs more likely to travel at least once every six months. The biggest pain point identified for moving funds internationally are the high fees.

Convenience allows for high costs

The reason we pay so much in fees is multifaceted. Australians exchange currency at the airport for convenience with some of the worst rates available, or via domestic banks, which choice also unfortunately comes with a range of hidden foreign exchange charges.

Analysis from News Corp and The Currency Shop shows that on $2,000 travellers can lose as much as $350 by exchanging cash at the airport. Consumers are being charged more for the convenience of selecting from a large range of currencies at the last minute.

Customer confusion is another leading cause of the fee sting. The ‘No Commission’ signs at exchange booths attract customers under the guise of competitive costs. Customers should check the wider buy and sell FX rates that usually cancel out any commission fee.

Another common trap is when travelling customers are asked whether they want to pay their bill in their own currency or the currency of the country they are in. Paying in your own currency is known as ‘Dynamic Currency Conversion’ and is generally not favourable to the client. If you accept this offer, the merchant or the ATM operator will perform the FX transaction at a foreign exchange rate that they determine.

The buy/sell spread on money transfers offered by most domestic banks ranges from 3-5%, which means that customers would typically be charged between $150 to $250 on a $5,000 foreign exchange transaction. These charges have not seen a significant change in the last decade.

Prepaid travel cards are one way to avoid future exchange rate uncertainty. However, they often come with a range of fees, whether that’s for loading the card, using it at an ATM, re-loading or closing the account, or being hit with exchange rate conversion fees when you use the card.

Using credit cards may also come with unexpected costs, with the industry average being a 2.5-3% fee on transactions and a $2.50-$5.00 ATM withdrawal fee.

The more efficient providers

The disruptors in the industry are the fintech players like Transferwise, Currency Fair and Worldremit. These providers are shaking up the FX money transfer industry by specialising in small payments for individual customers. Their online business models provide low overheads and that benefit is passed on to customers in the form of more competitive exchange rates.

Specialists like OFX and XE can be more competitive with their spreads. Our research found that on a $5,000 transfer, OFX could save a customer $182 compared to the most costly of the big four banks, while using XE could save over $200.

However, many customers prefer the security of a large bank. So, what is the industry doing about it?

Demand will drive product innovation

Locally, the big four banks are looking at adopting SWIFT global payments innovation (SWIFT gpi), a service which could allow real-time cross-border payments between institutions in Asia Pacific to ensure international transfers could occur in real time, as opposed to days. However, this remains in an exploratory phase.

At Citi, being an international bank, we have a globally mobile client base that travels more frequently than the average customer. Our clients expected us to innovate, and our contribution to industry disruption has been the launch of the Global Currency Account. It allows account holders consolidate their foreign currency holdings in one place, with individual accounts in up to 10 currencies. Citi’s FX spreads are lower than the domestic big four banks and are competitive with fintechs. The currencies are linked directly to a debit card, meaning users can switch between currencies instantly via their mobile app and pay with their card when travelling, with zero ATM fees charged when using local currency.

As our world becomes more global, domestic banks will also increasingly feel the pressure from customers to become more competitive with their foreign exchange options.

Technology is integral to product innovation, and there is an opportunity for fintechs to mould this space and drive bigger players to deliver on competitive rates, transparency and real time instant cross border payments. Multi-currency bank accounts are likely to become the expected way global citizens interact with their money and manage a life without borders.

 

Matthew Hayja is Head of Foreign Exchange Products in Citi’s Consumer BankAny advice is general advice only. This article was prepared without taking into account any individual’s objectives, financial situation, or needs.

 

9 Comments
Graydon Forward
July 13, 2018

Ripple and XRP will kill all of them for cost, speed and efficiency when it is released shortly. Coming to a bank near you. Get ready for a whole new paradigm.

SMSF Trustee
July 13, 2018

Don't know about speed and efficiency. I can convert A$ to many other currencies via my netbank account immediately. I can do that via an app from my phone, locally or overseas if I've set up roaming. I can then pay in foreign currency if I want to or need to.

That's pretty fast and efficient!

So unless they have a cost advantage, I wouldn't be quite so sure they're creating a whole new paradigm.

John
July 13, 2018

Yes, I can second the Citi bank debit card comments. Flawless performance experienced in uk, Asia, America, Europe. The ING orange everyday debit card seems to be the new close competitor, albeit with some technical conditions to use and I’m not sure how their FX rates compare to Citi...

Vicki Carlisle
July 12, 2018

It would have been interesting to see a real comparison of the total $A costs of the different options for a set amount of foreign currency (or multiple currencies). Say 1,000 USD/EUR/NZD and a similar value in THB and HKD - obviously it would have to be on the same day to remove those fluctuations.

Aside from that my tips would be to always have some of the local currency, and to use it all up before you come home - pay the hotel bill (make sure you have allowed for transfer!) or eat/drink at the airport (expensive as that may be). The conversion rates & fees on getting rid of excess foreign currency on your return are far worse than the costs of buying.

SMSF Trustee
July 13, 2018

Actually Vicki, the costs of converting cash currency when you get home are not greater than buying it in the first place. They're the same, because the spreads that banks charge are symmetrical - 5% or 10% either side of the mid-rate.

But you do make a good point. Having bought your foreign currency paying the buy spread before you went overseas, you don't want to convert it back to A$ and pay the sell spread as well. That doesn't cost more, but it probably feels like it because at that point the spread becomes "real". The $100 you converted to euro before you went becomes $90 when you get home. You "lost" half of that when you bought the euro and the other half when you sold euro to buy A$.

My wife and I always do last minute shopping, sometimes at the airport, before we fly home when we have excess cash currency.

JI
July 12, 2018

I am lucky enough to travel extensively and spend close to six months per year overseas. I use two cards whilst travelling.
1. A citi debit card to access cash at ATMs worldwide with no fee from citi - note, the bank you are using the card in sometimes charge a fee. The FX rate is very good.
2. A Bankwest credit card, no annual fee and no foreign conversion fees. Also a very competitive rate.

I believe the rate for both cards is set by Visa/MasterCard and is generally close to the wholesale rate.

MS
July 12, 2018

I use the same. Haven't found better.

Christian Antoniak
July 12, 2018

Citibank offer a good product through their debit card. You can withdraw cash at close to the daily listed exchange rate.
ING offer a great deal also with their cards. Close to the daily listed exchange rate and if you put in $1000?per month and make 5 withdrawals you get your ATM fees rebated. Qantas crew use both Citibank and ING now our overseas allowances are paid into our bank accounts at home

SMSF Trustee
July 12, 2018

This is the area I've felt for a long time was ripe for disruption. The spreads and fees that the banks and traditional FX providers charge are scandalous. I understand that if you want to get Euro currency from a branch office in suburban Sydney you have to pay for storage costs, the wages of the teller, the security of the notes and often transport from another branch if there's no supply in your suburb, but it's not a lot cheaper to go via a Travel Money card or similar.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Four foreign exchange secrets for travelers

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.