Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 249

Short selling is harder than you think

Short selling has been a hot topic after a noted US-based short seller released a negative report about listed fund manager Blue Sky Limited (ASX:BLA). This caused Blue Sky’s share price to fall 50%, wiping $440 million from its market cap. Short sellers are frequently derided as vultures, rumour mongers or even 'unAustralian'. However, in practice, shorting stocks is a difficult, stressful and lonely way to make money in a market which is predominately skewed towards good news and wearers of rose-tinted glasses.

This article does not look at the merits of Blue Sky as an investment, but rather at the mechanics and issues around short selling equities. Much of the recent coverage on short selling reveals that many of those who hold strident opinions on short selling have only a limited understanding of how it actually works.

Step one:  Find a company with bad characteristics and a catalyst

In traditional long only investing, the goal is to own good quality companies with honest management teams, clean balance sheets and solid future prospects. By contrast, the desirable characteristics of a short sell include companies with low or negative growth, high and increasing debt levels, a weak business model, overvaluation by a market, and possessing a shaky management team. However, a critical factor is the requirement for a catalyst: overvaluation or high debt in itself is rarely enough. In Blue Sky’s case, it was the negative report from Glaucus. As very few investors have the luxury of lobbing a damming report from the sidelines and outside the regulation of ASIC and the ASX, we would normally look for events such as a potentially bad acquisition (preferably off-shore), heavy directors selling, or corporate turnover at management level.

Step two: Find the stock to borrow

Short sellers will then borrow stock from a stockbroker and sell it. They are essentially betting that the price of the target company will decline before they have to replace the borrowed shares by buying the stock back. This is often the step that is ignored in the financial press when talking about shorting a company’s stock, as it is wrongly assumed that investors can easily borrow stock to reflect their negative view on a company.

When borrowing shares to short sell, an investor has to look closely at both the rate per annum that they are required to pay to borrow the stock, and where the owner is located geographically. The rate reflects supply and demand, and for most stocks is currently 0.5% per annum. For stocks where the shorting demand may be higher than the supply (such as Fortescue) the rate may be 15% or higher. In the case of small capitalisation or tightly held companies such as Blackmores, the short seller may be unable to borrow stock and thus cannot short sell. Obviously a high cost to borrow stock to sell short imposes a return hurdle on the would be short-seller.

In the case of Blue Sky, when we looked a week ago there was no stock available to be borrowed and the current short-sold position only represents 2.6 million shares, or 3.3% of the register and over the course of this week this has been reduced by 1 million shares as short sellers have closed their positions, buying back Blue Sky stock.

In a small and tightly held company such as Blue Sky, most holders would not lend out their stock for short selling as to do so they would be providing short sellers with the ammunition to bet against their long position. For example, BigUN – which was suspended from the ASX in February 2018 due to accounting irregularities – only had 500,000 shares lent out to short sellers, which is a mere 0.3% of the register. In the lead up to BigUN’s suspension as its share price was falling, the demand to short this stock would have been intense, but there would have been no stock available to be borrowed.

Step three: Watch for dividends and corporate actions

The short seller is required both to return the shares to the owner when requested, and also to pass on any dividends paid. We also strongly prefer to borrow stock from foreign owners such as large index funds like Vanguard or State Street, as if you borrow stock from a domestic owner and a dividend is paid, short sellers are required to compensate the original owner for both the dividend and any associated franking credits.

What happens if the stock goes up?

If the short stock rises sharply, the lender will be required to give their broker additional collateral, or the broker will require the short seller to close out the short sale transaction before the planned timeframe. A series of urgent requests to wire cash to your margin account to cover a short-sold stock that is rising sharply will test the mettle of even the most hardened short seller. In contrast, a long only position in a falling company can mentally be filed in one’s bottom drawer until it eventually comes good (or goes into administration).

This gives rise to the skewed payoff ratio from short selling, where the maximum gain is known (the stock falls to zero), but the maximum loss is theoretically infinite. Also, when a short position goes bad because the stock price rises, it becomes a larger part of the portfolio, and from a portfolio risk management perspective, there may be additional pressure to trim the position, which contributes to the short squeeze (defined below).

The market can remain wrong longer than you can remain solvent

It would be wrong to view that short selling risky stocks is a smooth path to outperformance. Keynes, the father of modern macroeconomics, once famously said that “markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent’’. This quote particularly resonated with me after an unprofitable short selling of Fortescue prior to the GFC due to concerns about the overvaluation and debt situation of the company.

This trade was put on at $50 per share late 2007 and then was closed out at $70 four months later as the price continued to rise with no signs of slowing momentum. It was very painful to lose 29% in a short stretch of time; however, Fortescue peaked at $120 in June 2008 before falling back to $20 in December 2008. Whilst our investment thesis was ultimately correct, we were unable to handle the pain of a steeply rising stock and the associated unrealised losses and increasing margin calls.

What's a short squeeze?

A 'short squeeze' occurs when a heavily-shorted stock rises sharply, forcing sellers to close out their position by buying back stock, thus causing further upward price momentum. Often when the market appears to overreact to a small piece of positive news, this is a short squeeze and it is similar to too many people trying to fit through a door.

For example, if JB-Hi Fi (currently 17% of the register has been 'borrowed' by short sellers anticipating that the price will go down) or Domino’s Pizza (18% short) were to receive a takeover bid, the price would escalate sharply as short sellers look to cover their positions. A nightmare scenario would be a contested bidding war if you are short. In December 2017 we saw a short squeeze in Westfield when a bid from Unibail-Rodamco came through. However, unlike Dominos or JB Hi-Fi, the percentage of the property trust’s outstanding shares that we sold short was not a large amount, though we did see a spike in the share price that reflected the short sellers buying back stock to exit their positions.

Short selling is not easy and does not deserve its poor reputation

While short selling is often criticised and retains a negative connotation in a securities industry that is inherently biased towards optimism, it serves a valid role in financial markets. Short sellers provide an alternative view and can aid both liquidity and price discovery. In coming years, especially with MiFID II (new European regulations on stockbrokers) reducing the incentives for the investment banks to put out sell side research, shorting will provide an alternative view. At the moment, it's no surprise that 80% of calls are buy or hold!

Investors should not look at situations like Blue Sky, BigUn or Slater and Gordon and view that it is an easy way to make money, nor that it is unfairly ganging up on a company. Even experienced and adept short sellers such as Glaucus make expensive mistakes. For example, its shorts on Japanese trading house Itochu would have cost the fund manager substantially, with Itochu's share price up +43% since Glaucus released a report in mid-2016. The same could still happen with Blue Sky.

 

Hugh Dive CFA is Chief Investment Officer at Atlas Funds Management. Neither the Atlas High Income Property Fund nor the Maxim Atlas Core Australian Equity Portfolio employ shorting as an investment strategy. However, the author has previously managed a long-short fund. This article does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

3 Comments
HughD
April 19, 2018

Thanks Andrew, good point about getting the stock called back. This is why most short sellers will prefer to use "GC" or General Collateral stocks, as the source of the borrow is usually the large global index funds such as BlackRock or State Street. Certainly in spicier names such as BLA or even DMP you run the risk of getting your stock called back and having trouble trying to replace it. The reason why it is usually tough to find borrow in the smaller names as it doesn't make much sense for a small cap fund manager who has a long position in a company to lend out their stock for what may be less than 1% per annum (after the investment bank have taken their cut).

Andrew Brown
April 16, 2018

Nice piece Hugh. I do disagree about the valuation shorts but that's subjective not objective. Blue Sky had all sorts of issues but I was amazed it took a Glaucus to unravel it. One factor you omitted in the borrowing aspect was the ability/propensity of an active fund lender to call their stock back in, meaning as a short you get bought in at any old price. That certainly happened in Blue Sky at various stages, and then in recent days as active holders wanted to sell and needed their shares back.

Fundie
April 15, 2018

Glaucus does have an advantage of not being subject to local regulations, and Blue Sky was ripe for criticism with its valuation methods and a fair amount of hubris about its share price and portfolio.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Reddit v hedge: GameStop rides to the moon and back

Shorting deserves more respect

Shrinking shorts not shrinking opportunities

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.