Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 31

Sir Michael Hintze: to whom much is given, much is expected

In the Forbes List of Australia’s 50 Richest, the names in the top 20 are probably well-known to most business people. Packer, Lowy, Triguboff, Rinehart, Forrest. At number 16 with an estimated US$1.55 billion is Sir Michael Hintze. The main reason for Hintze’s relatively low profile in Australia is not only because he lives in the UK and is active in their arts, politics and media rather than ours, but he has made his money in the rarefied atmosphere of alternative investments.

In this world, he is a hedge fund legend, with a life story that should be made into a movie. At the recent Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) conference in Sydney, Sir Michael Hintze gave some fascinating insights into the mind of a successful hedge fund manager. His firm, Convertible Quantitative Strategies (CQS), is a global multi strategy asset manager, and Bloomberg recently ranked the CQS Directional Opportunities Fund third in its list of 100 Top-Performing Hedge Funds. Hintze invests in non-traditional opportunities that 99% of investors never see, as shown by some of his funds:

  • long short relative value asset backed securities fund
  • global convertible bond arbitrage fund
  • long short credit fund
  • rig finance fund (for the construction of rigs and other oil and gas infrastructure)
  • long only European loan fund investing in senior, mezzanine and second lien loans.

What type of background does it take to run a leading hedge fund with US$12.5 billion under management and over 250 staff around the world? A remarkable one. Hintze was born in China in 1953 to Russian parents, who made their way to Sydney, where he was raised and educated. He considers himself an Australian. He holds a BSc in Physics and Pure Mathematics and a BEng in Electrical Engineering, both from the University of Sydney. He also holds an MSc in Acoustics from the University of New South Wales and an MBA from Harvard Business School. Hintze told his Sydney audience that he borrowed most of the money to finance his Harvard MBA. He worked at Salomon Bros, Goldman Sachs and CSFB before moving to London and setting up CQS in 1999.

And for good measure, before he started his finance career, he served for three years in the Australian Regular Army as a Captain in the Royal Australian Electrical and Mechanical Engineers. Hintze was knighted in June 2013 in recognition of his philanthropic work for charities and the arts, and he is a major supporter of the Conservative Party in the UK.

The types of funds CQS manages requires it to monitor global trends in everything imagineable, especially geopolitical, monetary and fiscal risks. The CQS website would win no awards for simple English, but when he says his strategy is a “collaborative multi-disciplinary approach seeking adjacencies across all areas in which we invest” (ouch, my head hurts!), you gain insights into the arbitrage and risk management process which has driven his success.

In fact, Hintze says he has invested $20 million “of my own money” on his risk management systems, and claims this has created a competitive advantage in liquidity management, execution and nimbleness. No doubt major competitors have invested far more in their systems, but it does show how the game has changed over recent years, creating problems for the small hedge fund manager who wants to compete by outsourcing administrative, settlement, trading and risk measurement functions to third parties.

Here are some of the insights Hintze gave in Sydney:

  • He is paid to take credit and arbitrage risks but he soon realised that massive operational risk must also be managed. A hedge fund must be operationally resilient.
  • His major successes have come from ”bespoke alpha-generating products”. Institutional investors are looking for different sources of alpha, and their use of hedge funds will grow.
  • The biggest trading risk is when correlations between markets go to 1, as this makes it more difficult to hedge risk.
  • Increasing regulation is the most significant change he's seen in the industry, followed by the availability of liquid derivatives. Regulators have long viewed hedge funds with suspicion, and have encouraged far greater disclosure.
  • There is massive moral hazard from expecting central banks to bailout the financial system every time there’s a major problem. Central bank intervention has been so heavy that there are fewer normal signals in the market now - what is the risk-free rate on government bonds when there’s massive intervention? It should be much higher.
  • China’s leaders are smart and well-educated and benefit from a 10 year political cycle, but the country is still sorting out problems with corruption, shadow banking, pollution and clean water.
  • There are 17 members of the Eurozone (those countries which have adopted the Euro), which gives many opportunities for credit trading on the short side.
  • Europe’s biggest problem is not the small countries like Greece and Cyprus, but France. It has fiscal and taxation problems it does not want to face.
  • He is optimistic on US prospects, driven by a good housing recovery, low-priced energy due to shale gas and strong demographics. The United States does not have high standards of building for homes in many places, and 300,000 houses a year fall apart. This creates a lot of ongoing employment for less skilled workers.
  • One million Australians are working overseas, and there are two reasons many do well: Aussies are willing to have a go, and they have a global perspective. It’s surprising how often he encounters Australians in senior positions in overseas countries.
  • There is also some advantage working and living in Australia, because you are outside of the daily noise and chatter, able to think about things more.
  • Philanthropy is a big deal. There is an obligation on those who have done well to give back. “To whom much has been given, much is expected.” Make a difference.
  • The main things that worry him are the long tail risks (a technical definition of long tail risk is the risk that an asset or portfolio of assets will move more than three standard deviations from its current price, potentially compromising the best risk management techniques).
  • To date, we have had little inflation because labour costs have not risen, and the velocity of money is down. But the massive growth in central bank balance sheets increases inflationary risks, and his risk management tries to remove rate risk from their portfolios.
  • Government spending has been good for equities and bonds, but what about our children?

Sir Michael Hintze probably has a perspective on every major geopolitical event in the world, with close sources making many of them uniquely well-informed. Although Hintze is personally fascinated by global politics, society and business, the type of funds he runs means that every major event is a potential trade. Without in any way making a moral judgement on him, he cannot help but see every conflict, every natural disaster, every border skirmish and every political battle in the context of the positions in his funds.

A few examples snuck out as the conversation turned to world events. Both India and Pakistan have tactical nuclear weapons, as opposed to strategic. All it needs is for some crazy lieutenant to take matters into his own hands, even if there is no central policy desire to do so. Oh, that would destroy a major food basket, what are the implications for agricultural commodities? Or if the Syrian crisis extends to Israel, what will happen to that very successful country? There’s an opportunity to trade Israeli Credit Default Swaps.

And that’s what’s required to run a global credit arbitrage fund. Have a global view, watch every part of the world, know what is happening everywhere. There is a potential trading opportunity in every major event, in the same way there’s a potential personal obligation in every worthy cause.

At the end of his keynote interview, Sir Michael was invited to stay for lunch. He agreed, then added, “But I won’t be able to stay long. I’ve got things to do.” Nobody in the room doubted it.

 

  •   13 September 2013
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Respect for markets and judging HFT

How ASIC defines ‘hedge funds’ and what it means to you

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, 2025 edition

Two years ago, I wrote an article suggesting that the odds favoured ASX shares easily outperforming residential property over the next decade. Here’s an update on where things stand today.

Australia's retirement system works brilliantly for some - but not all

The superannuation system has succeeded brilliantly at what it was designed to do: accumulate wealth during working lives. The next challenge is meeting members’ diverse needs in retirement. 

Get set for a bumpy 2026

At this time last year, I forecast that 2025 would likely be a positive year given strong economic prospects and disinflation. The outlook for this year is less clear cut and here is what investors should do.

Meg on SMSFs: First glimpse of revised Division 296 tax

Treasury has released draft legislation for a new version of the controversial $3 million super tax. It's a significant improvement on the original proposal but there are some stings in the tail.

The 3 biggest residential property myths

I am a professional real estate investor who hears a lot of opinions rather than facts from so-called experts on the topic of property. Here are the largest myths when it comes to Australia’s biggest asset class.

Property versus shares - a practical guide for investors

I’ve been comparing property and shares for decades and while both have their place, the differences are stark. When tax, costs, and liquidity are weighed, property looks less compelling than its reputation suggests.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Building a lazy ETF portfolio in 2026

What are the best ways to build a simple portfolio from scratch? I’ve addressed this issue before but think it’s worth revisiting given markets and the world have since changed, throwing up new challenges and things to consider.

Investment strategies

21 reasons we’re nearing the end of a secular bull market

Nearly all the indicators an investor would look for suggest that this secular bull market is approaching its end. My models forecast that the US is set for 0% annual returns over the next decade.

Property

13 million spare bedrooms: Rethinking Australia’s housing shortfall

We don’t have a housing shortage; we have housing misallocation. This explores why so many bedrooms go unused, what’s been tried before, and five things to unlock housing capacity – no new building required.

Investment strategies

Market entry – dip your toe or jump in all at once?

Lump sum investing usually wins, but it can hurt if markets fall. Using 50 years of Australian data, we reveal when staging your entry protects you, and when it drags on returns. 

Investment strategies

The US$21 trillion question: is AI an opportunity or excess?

It has been years since the US stock market has been so focused on a single driving theme, and AI is unquestionably that theme. This explores what it means for US and global markets in 2026.

Economy

US energy strategy holds lessons for Australia

The US has elevated energy to a national security priority, tying cheap, reliable power to economic strength, AI leadership, and sovereignty. This analyses the new framework and its implications for Australia.

Strategy

Venezuela’s democratic roots are deeper than Trump knows

Most people know Maduro was a dictator and Venezuela has oil. Few grasp the depth of suffering or the country’s democratic history - essential context as the US ousts Maduro and charts Venezuela’s future. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.