Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 29

Skilled managers do exist

John Authers of the Financial Times recently asserted that nobody can tell which “investors are more skilled than others” and that active fund managers are unaware of their skills. These assertions are wrong. I suggest – with statistics very much on my side – that Berkshire Hathaway’s Warren Buffett and Renaissance Technologies’ Jim Simons are more skilled than most and furthermore that there are others who with a little work can be identified. I also know that at Aberdeen we are keenly aware where we possess skill and – more pertinently – where we don’t.

Knowing where you possess skill however requires knowing what it is. Simply, investment skill involves identifying non-randomness (pattern) in financial markets then profiting from it. It is about knowing the difference between what is predictable (pattern) and what is not (randomness). It is about understanding where and when one has an edge then swooping in for the kill.

The sad fact is that the vast majority of investors waste their energies and capital guessing the equivalent of which side a coin will land, often supported by written and verbal justification that is both sincere and articulate.

Know when the odds are in your favour

The key to investing is knowing when the odds of a coin landing heads have increased to, say, 70 or 80%. And this is where serial mean reversion comes in. Occasionally, random walks take asset prices so far away from their mean or trend that they are pulled back towards it rather than continuing in a random fashion. If a coin lands heads ten times in a row, the odds of a tail on the next throw are still 50%. In the world of investing however, it may be 70 or 80%. Put another way, despite the ubiquitous disclaimer, past performance can sometimes be a guide to the future.

Identifying pattern is very much what the two aforementioned maestros do in their own different ways. Buffett’s edge, in my humble opinion, has been his remarkable understanding of human nature, both its strengths (what it takes to build a great company) and its weaknesses (propensity for humans to be greedy or to panic) combined with discipline, patience, honesty and a very good grasp of statistics. Jim Simons, on the other hand, is a brilliant mathematician and has smarter and faster computers than anyone else. While Buffett is the king of predicting share prices over 10 years, Simons is unrivalled over 10 minutes.

Buffett and Simons are rare birds yet many still believe themselves to be good investors when the facts may tell a blatantly different story. The reason for this is that we humans evolved a survival mechanism to believe that we are better than we actually are. A timid approach to facing down a sabre-toothed tiger or attracting a cave mate would have been disastrous. Furthermore, we have an asymmetrical ability to blame our failures on (bad) luck but to attribute our successes to skill, a bias termed the fundamental attribution error. Thus you only need a couple of successes amongst all the failures to think that you’re a skilful investor.

Need to use your edge

If you have correctly identified an edge, the next step is to know how to use it. Question: if you have a biased coin that you know has a 60% chance of landing heads and you are playing with someone who does not know the coin is biased, what percentage of your bankroll should you bet each round in order to increase your wealth over time?

If you bet nothing, you’re wasting your edge (you know, he doesn’t) and your wealth will remain the same. If you bet your entire purse, there’s a 40% chance the coin will come up tails, and you’ll lose everything and be out of the game (even with the bias, the chance of there being one tail in ten tosses is 99%.) So the optimal percentage must be somewhere between 0% and 100%. The answer, in fact, is 20%. Bet 21% or 19% and over time you’ll end up less wealthy than if you bet 20%. If you want to know the formula, look up the term ‘Kelly betting criterion’.

How does this apply to investing? In Buffett’s case, he of course understands that to put all one’s eggs in one basket is foolish, but also that being overloaded with baskets will wear you out. The efficient market hypothesis asserts that you should diversify as much as possible to eliminate stock specific risks. Buffett on the other hand actively seeks out stock specific ‘risk’ because he knows that’s where his edge lies. As he has noted, ‘Wide diversification is for people who don’t know what they’re doing.’

Does Buffett know precisely what his odds are? Of course not. What he does know is that he has a good feel for where a company will be in 10 or 20 years’ time, giving him the confidence to run a concentrated portfolio. There’s much we can learn from him, though I’ll admit I’m not the first to suggest that.

 

Peter Elston is Head of Asia Pacific Strategy & Asset Allocation at Aberdeen Standard Investments (formerly Aberdeen Asset Management).

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Unfortunately, all fund manager presentations are good

What game is your fund manager playing?

What types of people should manage your money?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.