Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 315

SMSF growth slower but future remains strong

A decade ago, over 40,000 SMSFs a year were being established. It’s now closer to 20,000, but that looks more like a maturity than a sector decline. The 2019 Vanguard/Investment Trends SMSF Reports show funds are being established when trustees are at a younger age, and one in five institutional super fund members is considering setting up an SMSF in the near future.

Superannuation remains a contestable and growing space, despite the banks withdrawing from wealth management and many fund managers struggling to retain money.

The Reports show responses from 5,000 SMSF trustees and 300 financial planners who advise SMSFs. This sector holds $750 billion compared with $1.8 trillion in all the large funds. There are now 600,000 SMSFs with average assets of $1.2 million, although the more meaningful median measure is $693,000, usually between two members. At $350,000 each to last for decades of retirement, SMSFs are not only used by wealthy people.

More defensive and diversified

Despite low interest rate, SMSFs remain heavily invested in cash and cash products, rising to 25% of assets in 2019 at the expense of a small drop in unlisted managed funds. Over the last eight years, the amount in listed investments such as ETFs, LIC and REITs has doubled, with much of it now going into fixed interest and global equities.

Source: Investment Trends 2019

SMSF trustees intend investing further in blue chip shares, with 54% nominating this investment choice for the next 12 months. While SMSFs are seeking overseas exposure, 52% of respondents still cite lack of knowledge about overseas markets and currency risk as a barrier.

Explaining the defensive mood, 31% say building a sustainable income stream is the main investment goal, while a rapidly-rising proportion now at 15% say protecting their assets against market falls is the main goal.

Unmet need for advice

SMSF trustees want advice on estate planning, tax and income strategies, post-retirement planning, portfolio strategies and investment selection. About 15% of trustees say managing their SMSF takes more time than expected, with investment selection the clear leader among the hardest aspects of running a fund.

The number of SMSF trustees who use a financial planner remains unchanged but overall satisfaction among clients is at a seven-year low. With multiple responses allowed, SMSF trustees say lack of confidence in adviser expertise (32%), the level of fees (29%) and difficulty finding a skilled adviser (22%) are the three main reasons for unmet advice needs. About a third (36%) of advisers expect their SMSF business to increase over the next three years.

Movements between types of funds

The Reports show 20% of large super fund members are considering setting up an SMSF, including 5% already doing it and 5% planning the move in the next 12 months. However, most of these are stated intentions and far fewer people actually take the step.

On the other hand, between 2013 and 2019, there is a massive increase in the number of trustees who have considered closing their SMSF and moving to a large fund, from only 4% to 20% (17% industry fund, 3% retail fund). The Royal Commission was a major factor, as well as the franking debate.

However, Investment Trends CEO, Michael Blomfield, said many factors favour retention of SMSFs:

“Number one is that people think their fund is performing okay. They also want greater access to certain asset classes, including property, infrastructure, small cap funds and responsible investment options, and to be able to give them greater weighting. It is also the flexibility to choose which managers they use, whether they use listed solutions or unlisted solutions, or they opt to buy Australian firms directly to access specific sectors.”

The Investment Trends/Vanguard Reports also show the thoughts of potential new SMSF trustees. While reasons such as ‘more control’ and ‘to achieve better returns’ are high, it’s a little disconcerting that ‘advice from a friend’ is the main factor, while accountants and financial planners remain highly influential. It begs the question whether an SMSF is in the best interests of so many people, especially when 17% say they ‘can make better investments than super funds’.

Source: Investment Trends 2019.

It is also becoming more common to hold an institutional super fund as well as an SMSF, with half of new SMSF trustees also retaining their former super fund, perhaps for access to favourable insurance rates. This was only 29% as recently as 2017.


Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.



Leave a Comment:



6 quick SMSF tips for the 2021/22 financial year

Minister Jane Hume on SMSFs and superannuation reform

Three areas SMSFs should consider outsourcing


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.