Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 121

Watch SMSF borrowing rules for separate assets

The superannuation law allows SMSFs to borrow to acquire assets. The law, referred to as a ‘limited recourse borrowing arrangement’ (LRBA), is complex. You need to establish a separate trust structure (known as a ‘bare trust’), separate trustee, and you must ensure that the purchase documents and loan contracts are correctly worded. You also need to do things in the appropriate order to comply with the superannuation law, the income tax law as well as stamp duty obligations. SMSF trustees should not attempt to enter into LRBAs without first consulting with a reliable SMSF specialist.

Understanding ‘single acquirable asset’

Under a LRBA, an SMSF can only borrow to acquire a ‘single acquirable asset’. The term ‘acquirable’ is important because if an SMSF purchases an asset from a related party of the members of the SMSF, it can only be an asset that is permitted under the law, such as listed securities and properties that are exclusively used in a business. If the asset is owned by an unrelated party, then it can be anything as long as the acquisition is in accordance with the SMSF’s trust deed and its investment strategy.

For real estate, a single asset is a property on one title. If the property is on two titles, it is treated as two separate assets, unless there is a unifying physical object attached to the land which is permanent in nature, not easily removed, and is significant in value relative to the value of the asset. If there is also a requirement under a law of a State or Territory that the two assets must be dealt with together, then it will be treated as a single asset. Be very careful with commercial and primary production properties in particular, as I have met clients wanting to purchase car yards and farms where the businesses are conducted on land spread over multiple titles where there were no restrictions in selling these titles separately. In order to purchase the properties, more than one LRBA needed to be established. This means, more than one bare trust needs to be established where each bare trust only holds one property title.

Trustees should also be wary of advice that encourages them to use multiple trustees for bare trusts. I have seen SMSF trustees who have been advised that where there are multiple LRBAs and multiple bare trusts, they need to have a different trustee for each bare trust. This advice is incorrect. You can have the same trustee to act as the trustee of all the bare trusts.

If the acquirable asset is listed shares, it needs to be a collection of identical shares that have the same market value, and were purchased in one single transaction at the same price. If the shares were purchased over a number of different transactions at different times and at different prices then more than one LRBA and more than one bare trust need to be established.

Some SMSF trustees believe it is a requirement for the bare trust to be a corporate trustee. This is also incorrect. The law does not state that the trustee must be a corporate trustee. An individual can act as the trustee of the bare trust as long as the same individual does not act as the trustee of the SMSF. I should point out that some lending institutions prefer the trustee of the bare trust to be a company; however, it is not a legal requirement.

I have assisted clients who have established LRBAs incorrectly due to incorrect advice received from professionals who do not fully understand the law. Although we resolved some issues, the initial bad advice cost clients a lot of stress and money.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF specialist and author of ‘SMSFs and Properties’. See www.monicarule.com.au. This article provides general information only and does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs.

 

  •   6 August 2015
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Who really loses from the SMSF borrowing ban?

Meg on SMSFs: How wide is the ban on LRBAs?

Ensure death benefit nominations are upheld

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.