Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 121

Watch SMSF borrowing rules for separate assets

The superannuation law allows SMSFs to borrow to acquire assets. The law, referred to as a ‘limited recourse borrowing arrangement’ (LRBA), is complex. You need to establish a separate trust structure (known as a ‘bare trust’), separate trustee, and you must ensure that the purchase documents and loan contracts are correctly worded. You also need to do things in the appropriate order to comply with the superannuation law, the income tax law as well as stamp duty obligations. SMSF trustees should not attempt to enter into LRBAs without first consulting with a reliable SMSF specialist.

Understanding ‘single acquirable asset’

Under a LRBA, an SMSF can only borrow to acquire a ‘single acquirable asset’. The term ‘acquirable’ is important because if an SMSF purchases an asset from a related party of the members of the SMSF, it can only be an asset that is permitted under the law, such as listed securities and properties that are exclusively used in a business. If the asset is owned by an unrelated party, then it can be anything as long as the acquisition is in accordance with the SMSF’s trust deed and its investment strategy.

For real estate, a single asset is a property on one title. If the property is on two titles, it is treated as two separate assets, unless there is a unifying physical object attached to the land which is permanent in nature, not easily removed, and is significant in value relative to the value of the asset. If there is also a requirement under a law of a State or Territory that the two assets must be dealt with together, then it will be treated as a single asset. Be very careful with commercial and primary production properties in particular, as I have met clients wanting to purchase car yards and farms where the businesses are conducted on land spread over multiple titles where there were no restrictions in selling these titles separately. In order to purchase the properties, more than one LRBA needed to be established. This means, more than one bare trust needs to be established where each bare trust only holds one property title.

Trustees should also be wary of advice that encourages them to use multiple trustees for bare trusts. I have seen SMSF trustees who have been advised that where there are multiple LRBAs and multiple bare trusts, they need to have a different trustee for each bare trust. This advice is incorrect. You can have the same trustee to act as the trustee of all the bare trusts.

If the acquirable asset is listed shares, it needs to be a collection of identical shares that have the same market value, and were purchased in one single transaction at the same price. If the shares were purchased over a number of different transactions at different times and at different prices then more than one LRBA and more than one bare trust need to be established.

Some SMSF trustees believe it is a requirement for the bare trust to be a corporate trustee. This is also incorrect. The law does not state that the trustee must be a corporate trustee. An individual can act as the trustee of the bare trust as long as the same individual does not act as the trustee of the SMSF. I should point out that some lending institutions prefer the trustee of the bare trust to be a company; however, it is not a legal requirement.

I have assisted clients who have established LRBAs incorrectly due to incorrect advice received from professionals who do not fully understand the law. Although we resolved some issues, the initial bad advice cost clients a lot of stress and money.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF specialist and author of ‘SMSFs and Properties’. See www.monicarule.com.au. This article provides general information only and does not take into account your individual objectives, financial situation or needs.

 

  •   6 August 2015
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Who really loses from the SMSF borrowing ban?

Meg on SMSFs: How wide is the ban on LRBAs?

Ensure death benefit nominations are upheld

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.