Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 127

SMSFs investing in overseas real estate

A question I am often asked is whether SMSFs can invest in overseas real estate?

Under the superannuation law, whether SMSFs invest in properties situated in Australia or overseas, the legal requirements are the same. For example:

Sole Purpose Test: The property investment must be made solely to provide retirement benefits for members and cannot be for private use or for use while holidaying in the foreign country.

Trust Deed and investment strategy: The property acquisition must be allowed by the SMSF’s Trust Deed and be consistent with the SMSF’s investment strategy.

Arm’s-length transactions: The purchase price for the property and rental income from the property must be at the market rate.

Related-party acquisitions: The property should not be acquired from members or related parties of the members unless it meets the legal definition of a ‘business real property’.

In-house asset rules: The purchase of the property and leasing of the property must comply with the in-house asset rules under the law.

Borrowing: If borrowing is required, it must be a legally complying Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA).

Understand the ownership laws in the foreign country

If the laws and customs of the foreign country allow a foreign investor (ie the SMSF) to invest directly in real properties (without a local entity intermediary), then the SMSF will not have a problem as long as it satisfies all the requirements of the superannuation law. The SMSF trustee will need to maintain documentary evidence as proof that the SMSF owns the overseas property and that the ownership is recognised in the foreign country.

In many countries, however, a foreign entity cannot hold a property directly. Therefore, an SMSF may need to establish a local entity which buys the property for the SMSF, with the SMSF owning all the interest in the local entity. The local entity may also need to be a taxpayer in that foreign country. As a result, indirect investment in overseas real estate can be a problem for SMSFs.

I have encountered transactions where the SMSF trustees needed to establish a Limited Liability Company (LLC) in the foreign country with its own bank account. The SMSF then invested in the shares of the LLC which then used the capital to finance the acquisition of the overseas property. The LLC is used as a flow-through vehicle for tax purposes. Any tax paid by the LLC may be eligible to be claimed back as a credit in Australia under the double tax agreement.

Watch the ‘in-house asset’ test

The problem with this requirement is that the investment by the SMSF in the LLC is treated as an ‘in-house asset’ under the superannuation law. The law only allows an SMSF to invest in a related entity and for the related entity not to be treated as an in-house asset, if the related entity is a non-geared entity. One of the requirements of a non-geared entity is that it does not have a loan with another entity unless the loan is a deposit with an authorised deposit taking institution which falls within the auspices of the Banking Act 1999. Unfortunately, overseas bank accounts do not comply with our banking legislation and therefore the SMSF investment in the LLC would be considered an in-house asset. This means the SMSF is restricted to an investment in the LLC of 5% of the total value of its assets.

An SMSF trustee would also need to consider the risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency and exchange rates. All superannuation assets need to be converted into Australian dollars for financial statements. The dollar variations could affect other calculations in SMSFs such as member balances and minimum pension payment requirements.

If an SMSF needs to enter into a LRBA to acquire an overseas property, it may have difficulties finding a lender, as the lender would be lending money to the SMSF to acquire shares in the LLC. Most banks will not lend if the security on the LRBA is overseas shares. If a foreign bank provides the loan to an SMSF, the documentation on the loan may not be consistent with the LRBA requirements under the superannuation law and the nature of the loan may, therefore, not be limited recourse.

Overseas investments can be complex and also come with higher risk due to the laws and customs of the foreign country. SMSF trustees need to consider overseas investments very carefully.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF specialist and author, see www.monicarule.com.au. This article is general education only and readers should seek specialist advice before taking action.

 

  •   18 September 2015
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Navigating SMSF property compliance

The mechanics of the $3 million super tax must be fixed

Valuable super contribution changes are now law

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Building a lazy ETF portfolio in 2026

What are the best ways to build a simple portfolio from scratch? I’ve addressed this issue before but think it’s worth revisiting given markets and the world have since changed, throwing up new challenges and things to consider.

Ray Dalio on 2025’s real story, Trump, and what’s next

The renowned investor says 2025’s real story wasn’t AI or US stocks but the shift away from American assets and a collapse in the value of money. And he outlines how to best position portfolios for what’s ahead.

13 million spare bedrooms: Rethinking Australia’s housing shortfall

We don’t have a housing shortage; we have housing misallocation. This explores why so many bedrooms go unused, what’s been tried before, and five things to unlock housing capacity – no new building required.

21 reasons we’re nearing the end of a secular bull market

Nearly all the indicators an investor would look for suggest that this secular bull market is approaching its end. My models forecast that the US is set for 0% annual returns over the next decade.

Making sense of record high markets as the world catches fire

The post-World War Two economic system is unravelling, leading to huge shifts in currency, bond and commodity markets, yet stocks seem oblivious to the chaos. This looks to history as a guide for what’s next.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 644 with weekend update

Stocks bounced hard off April lows, gold hit record highs and even bonds gained – 2025 was a year where it was hard not to make money. This breaks down the year and how to best position portfolios for 2026 and beyond.

  • 8 January 2026

Latest Updates

Property

How cutting the CGT discount could help rebalance housing market

A more rational taxation system that supports home ownership but discourages asset speculation could provide greater financial support to first home buyers.

Investment strategies

The Ozempic moment for SaaS

Every investing cycle has its Ozempic moment, a narrative shock so compelling that the market briefly forgets that incumbents can and do adapt to transformative technology like AI.

Superannuation

Meg on SMSFs: Last word on Div 296 for a while

The best way to deal with the incoming Division 296 tax on superannuation is likely doing nothing. Earnings will be taxed regardless of where the money sits, so here are some important considerations.

Investment strategies

If people talk about a bubble, it’s unlikely to crash soon

It is almost impossible to identify a bubble in real time, and history shows they last far longer than we think, giving investors (perhaps misplaced) hope and short-sellers seemingly endless pain before the share price collapses.

Investment strategies

Seismic shifts that could drive private markets

Dealmaking appears to be on the mend, but investors could be well served to look through near-term trends toward six major themes that we think may drive private markets for years to come.

Latest from Morningstar

Corporations are winning the stock market. Here’s a new plan for everyone else

Retail investors have the worst trading record, according to a study of trading performance. Institutional investors weren't at the top either. Here are 6 ways to improve your odds.

Infrastructure

The bull case for Melbourne

A counterpoint to today’s prevailing narrative that Melbourne is the capital of a failing state defined by its strained public finances, COVID hangover and an opposition obsessed with undermining its own credibility.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.