Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 127

SMSFs investing in overseas real estate

A question I am often asked is whether SMSFs can invest in overseas real estate?

Under the superannuation law, whether SMSFs invest in properties situated in Australia or overseas, the legal requirements are the same. For example:

Sole Purpose Test: The property investment must be made solely to provide retirement benefits for members and cannot be for private use or for use while holidaying in the foreign country.

Trust Deed and investment strategy: The property acquisition must be allowed by the SMSF’s Trust Deed and be consistent with the SMSF’s investment strategy.

Arm’s-length transactions: The purchase price for the property and rental income from the property must be at the market rate.

Related-party acquisitions: The property should not be acquired from members or related parties of the members unless it meets the legal definition of a ‘business real property’.

In-house asset rules: The purchase of the property and leasing of the property must comply with the in-house asset rules under the law.

Borrowing: If borrowing is required, it must be a legally complying Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA).

Understand the ownership laws in the foreign country

If the laws and customs of the foreign country allow a foreign investor (ie the SMSF) to invest directly in real properties (without a local entity intermediary), then the SMSF will not have a problem as long as it satisfies all the requirements of the superannuation law. The SMSF trustee will need to maintain documentary evidence as proof that the SMSF owns the overseas property and that the ownership is recognised in the foreign country.

In many countries, however, a foreign entity cannot hold a property directly. Therefore, an SMSF may need to establish a local entity which buys the property for the SMSF, with the SMSF owning all the interest in the local entity. The local entity may also need to be a taxpayer in that foreign country. As a result, indirect investment in overseas real estate can be a problem for SMSFs.

I have encountered transactions where the SMSF trustees needed to establish a Limited Liability Company (LLC) in the foreign country with its own bank account. The SMSF then invested in the shares of the LLC which then used the capital to finance the acquisition of the overseas property. The LLC is used as a flow-through vehicle for tax purposes. Any tax paid by the LLC may be eligible to be claimed back as a credit in Australia under the double tax agreement.

Watch the ‘in-house asset’ test

The problem with this requirement is that the investment by the SMSF in the LLC is treated as an ‘in-house asset’ under the superannuation law. The law only allows an SMSF to invest in a related entity and for the related entity not to be treated as an in-house asset, if the related entity is a non-geared entity. One of the requirements of a non-geared entity is that it does not have a loan with another entity unless the loan is a deposit with an authorised deposit taking institution which falls within the auspices of the Banking Act 1999. Unfortunately, overseas bank accounts do not comply with our banking legislation and therefore the SMSF investment in the LLC would be considered an in-house asset. This means the SMSF is restricted to an investment in the LLC of 5% of the total value of its assets.

An SMSF trustee would also need to consider the risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency and exchange rates. All superannuation assets need to be converted into Australian dollars for financial statements. The dollar variations could affect other calculations in SMSFs such as member balances and minimum pension payment requirements.

If an SMSF needs to enter into a LRBA to acquire an overseas property, it may have difficulties finding a lender, as the lender would be lending money to the SMSF to acquire shares in the LLC. Most banks will not lend if the security on the LRBA is overseas shares. If a foreign bank provides the loan to an SMSF, the documentation on the loan may not be consistent with the LRBA requirements under the superannuation law and the nature of the loan may, therefore, not be limited recourse.

Overseas investments can be complex and also come with higher risk due to the laws and customs of the foreign country. SMSF trustees need to consider overseas investments very carefully.

 

Monica Rule is an SMSF specialist and author, see www.monicarule.com.au. This article is general education only and readers should seek specialist advice before taking action.

 

  •   18 September 2015
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Why investors are looking beyond traditional property sectors

Navigating SMSF property compliance

The mechanics of the $3 million super tax must be fixed

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.