Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 100

A super consensus needed before the demographic tsunami

Last week’s release of the Intergenerational Report showed there will be an increase in the number of people retiring over the next few decades, and they will live longer in retirement than ever before. These changing demographics will create challenges for any government that is in power over coming years.

Reading through the pages of the Report, it is clear that policymakers recognise the important role superannuation plays in the Australian economy. Not only does it provide benefits to individuals by delivering extra income in retirement, it also benefits the community, by decreasing reliance on the age pension and therefore alleviating pressure on government finances.

Rise in number of fully self-funded retirees

ASFA estimates that at present, around 32% of retirees aged 65 or over have accumulated enough superannuation and private savings to be fully self-funded. As the system matures, the benefits will broaden and increase, with the number of fully self-funded retirees rising to 40% by 2023.

Retirees at age 65PV Chart1 130315

PV Chart1 130315

Source: Department of Social Services and ASFA Research Centre

Superannuation is working on a number of levels to alleviate demographic-related fiscal pressures. People who have private savings are more likely to fully or partially self-fund healthcare, aged care or other age-related expenses.

Super tax concessions will change

While this is a good news story for superannuation, there are other parts of the system that are not working as well as they could. You only need to glance at the newspapers over the past few weeks to see that the equity of superannuation tax concessions is continuing to be challenged. This is a debate that ASFA welcomes, but it’s essential that it be based on facts and not media hysteria.

The $32 billion dollar figure that is often quoted as the ‘annual cost to revenue’ of superannuation tax concessions is arguably inflated for two key reasons. It does not take into account the savings the government makes on pensions and other age-related government expenditure as a result of people having super. It also does not take into account what alternative vehicles people will seek particularly those with high net worth, if super becomes less tax-effective. The search for a better deal, for example into geared property or shares, means they end up trading one concession for another.

However there’s no doubt that as the system matures and account balances get bigger the cohorts that benefit from tax concessions in super will change.

Last year ASFA conducted an analysis of the flow of superannuation tax concessions by taxable income bracket. Parts of the analysis are somewhat different to what you often hear in the media. It found that around 90% of employer contributions to super go to individuals paying less than the top marginal tax rate, with 57% going to those paying a tax rate of 30% or less. This means the bulk of tax concessions applied to contributions flow to those paying either the 30 or 38% marginal tax rate. This is a large part of the Australian workforce and shows that the lower concessional contribution caps are doing their job.

However, the analysis also found that when it comes to tax concessions on earnings, the benefits are skewed towards middle-high income earners, who generally have a higher superannuation account balance, some in the millions. Given the demographic fiscal pressures, it’s appropriate to question whether it’s fair for future generations of taxpayers to fund generous tax concessions on earnings for older Australians who have accumulated these very high account balances.

As stated in the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) final report, the overarching goal of the superannuation system should be to allow people to accumulate private savings that deliver an income in retirement to substitute or supplement the age pension. It is therefore fair to say that tax concessions should start to fall away once a person has accumulated enough superannuation savings to generate an income that enables them to have a comfortable retirement.

How much is enough superannuation?

So how much is enough, and how much is too much? At a bare minimum, the superannuation balance required to live at the ASFA Retirement Standard ‘comfortable’ level should continue to attract the same tax concessions that are currently in place. Taking into account the fact that many people will continue to live in private rental accommodation during their retirement, and the financial risks associated with increased longevity and future medical and aged care expenses, ASFA estimates a balance of $2.5 million is sufficient to support a lifestyle in retirement which is comfortable for the great bulk of the Australian population. This could potentially be the ‘ceiling’ where the tax rules change.

Most people will never be able to accumulate an account balance anywhere near $2.5 million, so aiming tax changes above this amount will limit community reaction. It is also fair to say that most individuals who have super above this amount should have limited objections to paying a small amount of additional tax, particularly when they have received considerable tax concessions in the past on the contributions and investment earnings that enabled them to build such a large pot of savings.

These are discussions that will be had during the Tax White Paper process, and the FSI consultations. What’s important is that we all reach a consensus on what changes need to be made to our system to ensure it remains equitable and sustainable when the baby boomer tsunami reaches our shores.

 

Pauline Vamos is Chief Executive Officer of The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

4 Comments
Bob
March 17, 2015

Yes it's a very ugly public debate, the have-nots attacking the haves, nothing more than the politics of envy. the $2.5m sounds outrageous to most people but those of us who can do the maths know that this quantum is required at the minimum, once you lose all age pension entitlements.

The real problem in this debate is that the media and the punter don't have a clue just how valuable their pensions are and how much it really costs to replace it. The smarter but less affluent people spend their $ on holidays, living bequests, doing up their homes, then milk the system for all it's worth.

MattD
March 13, 2015

The superannuation system already has a number of measures designed to make it more "equitable"

- Reduced concessional caps since 2007
- Maximum super contribution base
- double contributions tax for those earning over $300k

ASFA data strongly suggests that the tax concessions are flowing through as intended - to the middle-income Australians saving for the retirement.

I just dont understand the obsession with changing the system to reduce tax concessions to a relatively small number of people. Tail wagging dog!

Ross Johnstone
March 12, 2015

The ASFA selection of $2.5m as a suitable level at which tax could be imposed must surely be increased. Returns on such an amount would be considerably less than the average worker now receives and those in retirement face very high medical expenses and high risk to their capital if they attempt to increase their income return on investments.

Rory Mooney
March 12, 2015

Pauline, why not simply introduce a tax in income phase of say 10%, it's relative and user pays?

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Do you plan to be a ‘have’ or a ‘have not’?

Time to build a super system fit for retirement

$1 million is never worth less than $500,000

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.