Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 441

Global survey shows Australians least confident about retiring

Australians remain optimistic about retiring comfortably, yet their confidence levels significantly lag those of retirement savers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, according to the latest MFS Global Defined Contribution Participant Survey.

The study, which surveyed over 4,000 people globally, including more than 1,000 who contribute to an Australian superannuation fund, showed 71% of local savers are confident about retiring at a desired age, but less so that their retirement savings will last their lifetime, at 68%.  This contrasts sharply with retirement confidence in the US, the highest of any market, where respectively 84% and 82% of savers are confident in realising their desired retirement age and income adequacy throughout retirement.

Longer working and retirement saving horizons due to COVID, felt most by under 45s

Australian investors are in step with global peers in believing they need to save more and work longer than planned due to COVID-19, particularly those under 45 years old. 64% of this younger cohort in Australia believe that they will need to save more for retirement, while 58% believe they will need to work longer to achieve their retirement savings goals. These younger investors are twice as bullish as their older peers, with 47% taking on ‘significant’ risk to gain a substantial return, compared to 21% of people aged over 45.

Source: MFS Global Retirement Survey, AU respondents.

Retirement age and income adequacy remain ongoing and highly complex discussions for Australia’s wealth industry, perhaps more so given the retirement investing psyche clearly appears quite sensitive and risk averse at present relative to other markets.

The shock and persisting uncertainty caused by the pandemic has undoubtedly left an indelible mark on younger retirement investors, and their concerns need to be properly addressed for them to get back on track, with a deeper appreciation that uncertainty and opportunity are often key to long-term investing.

With a growing spotlight on performance against a backdrop of YFYS policy, pandemic waves and escalating global risks, fostering investor confidence and active engagement in retirement saving decisions, with a focus on risk management, must remain a core objective for the whole, long-term investment industry.

ESG appetite soars within superannuation

Like global investors, Australians want to see more ESG investments in their superannuation fund portfolios, a view expressed by 74% of all local respondents, including 83% of local millennials. Generation X and baby boomers followed with 72% and 65%, respectively.

Source: MFS Global Retirement Survey, AU respondents.

ESG investing continues to transform the way in which investors view and allocate their capital, and while quality long-term, purpose-focused investments inherently integrate ESG, superannuation funds are responding to demand for greater depth and diversity of investments that target change and impact. The associated noise however can be intense, and we see a growing role for advisers to educate investors on the many shades of green and ESG within offerings, along with pointing out the differences between asset managers that integrate ESG into their overall investment approach and those that approach it strictly from a product perspective.

Superannuation advice gaps 

Australian respondents are also the most unsure about what levels of return to expect on their retirement savings and at what rate are they likely to withdraw funds during retirement, factors potentially contributing to low confidence levels. Almost one-third (32%) rely on their superannuation fund to help them make retirement contribution and planning decisions, 30% turn to a family member, while only 29% receive professional advice. Just over half of advised people elected their planner based on fees, followed by years of experience and retirement planning expertise. 46% of all prefer to receive advice in-person with their planner, including video calls.

Applying a gender lens, 34% of men turned to a financial adviser for retirement advice, compared to 24% of women.

Sources, quality and consistency of advice vary widely. We see enormous potential for advisers to provide a greater and more specialist role in providing asset allocation advice to superannuants, especially women who remain under-advised despite their working lives typically being more varied and punctuated by life events.

Concept of retirement is evolving

The survey found that the average Australian expects to retire at the age of 60.7 years; however, almost one quarter (24%) expect this to be closer to 71 or older. Only 13% expect a hard stop retirement, with the overwhelming majority (57%) expecting to reduce working hours or switch jobs.

Source: MFS Global Retirement Survey, AU respondents.

Our research shows that retirement is not the hard stop, party event that some may have once envisaged. The findings, gleaned through multiple waves of COVID, are a reminder that retirement is an evolving concept shaped by a myriad of factors, which will continue to change the composition and delivery of wealth management and financial advice.

 

Marian Poirier is Senior Managing Director, Head of Australia and New Zealand at MFS Investment Management. These views are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to purchase any security or as a solicitation or investment advice. No forecasts can be guaranteed. This article is issued in Australia by MFS International Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 68 607 579 537, AFSL 485343), a sponsor of Firstlinks.

For more articles and papers from MFS, please click here.

Unless otherwise indicated, logos and product and service names are trademarks of MFS® and its affiliates and may be registered in certain countries.

 

About the MFS 2021 Global Defined Contribution Member Survey

Dynata, an independent third-party research provider, conducted a study among Defined Contribution (DC) plan participants in the US, Canada, UK, and Australia on behalf of MFS. MFS was not identified as the sponsor of the study.

To qualify, DC plan participants had to be ages 18+, employed at least part-time, active workplace retirement plan participants / members: in the US, actively contributing to a 401(k), 403(b), 457, or 401(a) / in Canada, actively contributing to DC Pension Plan, Group Registered Retirement Savings Plan, Deferred Profit Sharing Plan, Non-Registered Group Savings Plan, or Simplified Employee Pension Plan / in the UK, actively contributing to a Defined Contribution Scheme, Master Trust, or Individual Savings Account. / in Australia, actively contributing to an industry, retail, corporate or public sector super fund or a self-managed super fund. Data weighted to mirror the age / gender distribution of the workforce in each country.

1,020 US, 1,012 Canadian, 1,017 UK and 1,011 Australian plan participants answered the survey, which was fielded between March 31 – April 13, 2021.

 

4 Comments
Ruth
January 14, 2022

If I choose to invest in a passively invested fund, it angers me to know that these large funds have significant voting rights. I don't believe that the personal wishes of representatives should be involved in voting in my name or any other shareholder's. That is not passive investing and I don't want to pay for their involvement. There regulatory controls by governments. I want the boards to consist of people who know something about their own industry, not people appointing proxy advisers etc.

George
January 13, 2022

We have a world-leading super and pension system, and the US has a far inferior version, a shocking public health system and far more people living in poverty or jail. Yet they are more confident about retirement. We have a sales job to do here on how good our system is.

Lisa
January 13, 2022

Think our media and vested interests like financial planners and super funds like to ensure uncertainty to encourage their interests. Then there are the unrealistic lifestyle expectations for some - overseas trips, manicures, iPhones etc. Those who have been spenders and not savers can also be in for a shock, especially if still renting. Hopefully years of compulsory superannuation contributions will help. Our aged pension is great for a modest lifestyle for a home owner, but tight otherwise.

Jason
January 14, 2022

Most Australian defined benefit pension sustems were abolished decades ago whereas in the US many are benefitting from these generous systems, in particular government employees who may also have 401k (super) plans as well. In addition many employees in the US have solid insurance plans including income protection and TPD insurance. In Australia these employer backed systems were abolished and now we rely on flakey private insurance products that become prohibitively expensive once you enter your 50s with centrelink disability pensions almost impossible to access. A Brickie with a destroyed back is expected to go and drive a taxi and would not be entitled to a pension unless they can prove incapacity to work in any occupation.

Also, in the US the old aged pension is means tested and considered an entitlemt for continuous employment which could be up to $1000 a week.. In other words many consider it as a base income in addition to any defined benefit pension which allows them to take on more risk with any 401 K savings and hence get a better .return.

Our old age pension is meagre and quickly cuts out if you have some assets. If you are old and renting, with meagre savings forget it. Remember when Hockey tried to lift the eligibility age to 70 and try to cut the indexing to CPI rather than wages? Someone will try to cut it again.

Americans are also have a Medicare system , but it only applies when you are ollder.

Also, home investment bias has been very kind to US investors.

The reason why Australians are worried is because we should be. Most safety nets here have been removed , or privatised.. Australians don't find out how naked they are until there is a crisis, eg main breadwinner gets Parkinson's diagnosis in early 60s when they were planning to retire at 72.

Now we hear that future investment returns wll be mediocre.We have to manage our own sequencing and longevity risk at the same time as betting our futures on the stock market. We are expectedd to work and save like mad at the same time as running a massive mortgage as banks know that they can go for your super if you default.







 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

REIT sectors are different, faced with fundamentals and inflation

'OK Boomer' responses keep on coming

Responses to the 'OK Boomer' poll

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Taxation

Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Infrastructure

Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.