Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 441

Global survey shows Australians least confident about retiring

Australians remain optimistic about retiring comfortably, yet their confidence levels significantly lag those of retirement savers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, according to the latest MFS Global Defined Contribution Participant Survey.

The study, which surveyed over 4,000 people globally, including more than 1,000 who contribute to an Australian superannuation fund, showed 71% of local savers are confident about retiring at a desired age, but less so that their retirement savings will last their lifetime, at 68%.  This contrasts sharply with retirement confidence in the US, the highest of any market, where respectively 84% and 82% of savers are confident in realising their desired retirement age and income adequacy throughout retirement.

Longer working and retirement saving horizons due to COVID, felt most by under 45s

Australian investors are in step with global peers in believing they need to save more and work longer than planned due to COVID-19, particularly those under 45 years old. 64% of this younger cohort in Australia believe that they will need to save more for retirement, while 58% believe they will need to work longer to achieve their retirement savings goals. These younger investors are twice as bullish as their older peers, with 47% taking on ‘significant’ risk to gain a substantial return, compared to 21% of people aged over 45.

Source: MFS Global Retirement Survey, AU respondents.

Retirement age and income adequacy remain ongoing and highly complex discussions for Australia’s wealth industry, perhaps more so given the retirement investing psyche clearly appears quite sensitive and risk averse at present relative to other markets.

The shock and persisting uncertainty caused by the pandemic has undoubtedly left an indelible mark on younger retirement investors, and their concerns need to be properly addressed for them to get back on track, with a deeper appreciation that uncertainty and opportunity are often key to long-term investing.

With a growing spotlight on performance against a backdrop of YFYS policy, pandemic waves and escalating global risks, fostering investor confidence and active engagement in retirement saving decisions, with a focus on risk management, must remain a core objective for the whole, long-term investment industry.

ESG appetite soars within superannuation

Like global investors, Australians want to see more ESG investments in their superannuation fund portfolios, a view expressed by 74% of all local respondents, including 83% of local millennials. Generation X and baby boomers followed with 72% and 65%, respectively.

Source: MFS Global Retirement Survey, AU respondents.

ESG investing continues to transform the way in which investors view and allocate their capital, and while quality long-term, purpose-focused investments inherently integrate ESG, superannuation funds are responding to demand for greater depth and diversity of investments that target change and impact. The associated noise however can be intense, and we see a growing role for advisers to educate investors on the many shades of green and ESG within offerings, along with pointing out the differences between asset managers that integrate ESG into their overall investment approach and those that approach it strictly from a product perspective.

Superannuation advice gaps 

Australian respondents are also the most unsure about what levels of return to expect on their retirement savings and at what rate are they likely to withdraw funds during retirement, factors potentially contributing to low confidence levels. Almost one-third (32%) rely on their superannuation fund to help them make retirement contribution and planning decisions, 30% turn to a family member, while only 29% receive professional advice. Just over half of advised people elected their planner based on fees, followed by years of experience and retirement planning expertise. 46% of all prefer to receive advice in-person with their planner, including video calls.

Applying a gender lens, 34% of men turned to a financial adviser for retirement advice, compared to 24% of women.

Sources, quality and consistency of advice vary widely. We see enormous potential for advisers to provide a greater and more specialist role in providing asset allocation advice to superannuants, especially women who remain under-advised despite their working lives typically being more varied and punctuated by life events.

Concept of retirement is evolving

The survey found that the average Australian expects to retire at the age of 60.7 years; however, almost one quarter (24%) expect this to be closer to 71 or older. Only 13% expect a hard stop retirement, with the overwhelming majority (57%) expecting to reduce working hours or switch jobs.

Source: MFS Global Retirement Survey, AU respondents.

Our research shows that retirement is not the hard stop, party event that some may have once envisaged. The findings, gleaned through multiple waves of COVID, are a reminder that retirement is an evolving concept shaped by a myriad of factors, which will continue to change the composition and delivery of wealth management and financial advice.

 

Marian Poirier is Senior Managing Director, Head of Australia and New Zealand at MFS Investment Management. These views are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to purchase any security or as a solicitation or investment advice. No forecasts can be guaranteed. This article is issued in Australia by MFS International Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 68 607 579 537, AFSL 485343), a sponsor of Firstlinks.

For more articles and papers from MFS, please click here.

Unless otherwise indicated, logos and product and service names are trademarks of MFS® and its affiliates and may be registered in certain countries.

 

About the MFS 2021 Global Defined Contribution Member Survey

Dynata, an independent third-party research provider, conducted a study among Defined Contribution (DC) plan participants in the US, Canada, UK, and Australia on behalf of MFS. MFS was not identified as the sponsor of the study.

To qualify, DC plan participants had to be ages 18+, employed at least part-time, active workplace retirement plan participants / members: in the US, actively contributing to a 401(k), 403(b), 457, or 401(a) / in Canada, actively contributing to DC Pension Plan, Group Registered Retirement Savings Plan, Deferred Profit Sharing Plan, Non-Registered Group Savings Plan, or Simplified Employee Pension Plan / in the UK, actively contributing to a Defined Contribution Scheme, Master Trust, or Individual Savings Account. / in Australia, actively contributing to an industry, retail, corporate or public sector super fund or a self-managed super fund. Data weighted to mirror the age / gender distribution of the workforce in each country.

1,020 US, 1,012 Canadian, 1,017 UK and 1,011 Australian plan participants answered the survey, which was fielded between March 31 – April 13, 2021.

 

  •   12 January 2022
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
George
January 12, 2022

We have a world-leading super and pension system, and the US has a far inferior version, a shocking public health system and far more people living in poverty or jail. Yet they are more confident about retirement. We have a sales job to do here on how good our system is.

Lisa
January 12, 2022

Think our media and vested interests like financial planners and super funds like to ensure uncertainty to encourage their interests. Then there are the unrealistic lifestyle expectations for some - overseas trips, manicures, iPhones etc. Those who have been spenders and not savers can also be in for a shock, especially if still renting. Hopefully years of compulsory superannuation contributions will help. Our aged pension is great for a modest lifestyle for a home owner, but tight otherwise.

Jason
January 13, 2022

Most Australian defined benefit pension sustems were abolished decades ago whereas in the US many are benefitting from these generous systems, in particular government employees who may also have 401k (super) plans as well. In addition many employees in the US have solid insurance plans including income protection and TPD insurance. In Australia these employer backed systems were abolished and now we rely on flakey private insurance products that become prohibitively expensive once you enter your 50s with centrelink disability pensions almost impossible to access. A Brickie with a destroyed back is expected to go and drive a taxi and would not be entitled to a pension unless they can prove incapacity to work in any occupation.

Also, in the US the old aged pension is means tested and considered an entitlemt for continuous employment which could be up to $1000 a week.. In other words many consider it as a base income in addition to any defined benefit pension which allows them to take on more risk with any 401 K savings and hence get a better .return.

Our old age pension is meagre and quickly cuts out if you have some assets. If you are old and renting, with meagre savings forget it. Remember when Hockey tried to lift the eligibility age to 70 and try to cut the indexing to CPI rather than wages? Someone will try to cut it again.

Americans are also have a Medicare system , but it only applies when you are ollder.

Also, home investment bias has been very kind to US investors.

The reason why Australians are worried is because we should be. Most safety nets here have been removed , or privatised.. Australians don't find out how naked they are until there is a crisis, eg main breadwinner gets Parkinson's diagnosis in early 60s when they were planning to retire at 72.

Now we hear that future investment returns wll be mediocre.We have to manage our own sequencing and longevity risk at the same time as betting our futures on the stock market. We are expectedd to work and save like mad at the same time as running a massive mortgage as banks know that they can go for your super if you default.







Ruth
January 13, 2022

If I choose to invest in a passively invested fund, it angers me to know that these large funds have significant voting rights. I don't believe that the personal wishes of representatives should be involved in voting in my name or any other shareholder's. That is not passive investing and I don't want to pay for their involvement. There regulatory controls by governments. I want the boards to consist of people who know something about their own industry, not people appointing proxy advisers etc.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

REIT sectors are different, faced with fundamentals and inflation

'OK Boomer' responses keep on coming

Responses to the 'OK Boomer' poll

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Why I dislike dividend stocks

If you need income then buying dividend stocks makes perfect sense. But if you don’t then it makes little sense because it’s likely to limit building real wealth. Here’s what you should do instead.

Latest Updates

A speech from the Prime Minister on fixing housing

“Fellow Australians, I want to address our most pressing national issue: housing. For too long, governments have tiptoed around problems from escalating prices, but for the sake of our younger generations, that stops today.”        

Taxation

Family trusts: Are they still worth it?

Family trusts remain a core structure for wealth management, but rising ATO scrutiny and complex compliance raise questions about their ongoing value. Are the benefits still worth the administrative burden?

Exchange traded products

Multiple ways to win

Both active and passive investing can work, but active investment doesn’t in the way it is practised by many fund managers and passive investing doesn’t work in the way most end investors practise it. Here’s a better way.

Economy

The Future Fund may become a 'bad bank' for problem home loans

The Future Fund says it will not be paying defined benefit pensions until at least 2033 - raising as many questions as answers. This points to an increasingly uncertain future for Australia's sovereign wealth fund.

Investment strategies

Managed accounts and the future of portfolio construction

With $233 billion under management, managed accounts are evolving into diversified, transparent, and liquid investment frameworks. The rise of ETFs and private markets marks a shift in portfolio design and discipline. 

Property

Commercial property prospects are looking up

Commercial property is seeing the same supply issues as the residential market. Given the chronic undersupply and a recent pickup in demand, it bodes well for an upturn in commercial real estate prices.

Infrastructure

Private toll roads need a shake-up

Privatised toll roads in Australia help governments avoid upfront costs but often push financial risks onto taxpayers while creating monopolies and unfair toll burdens for commuters and businesses.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.