Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 441

Global survey shows Australians least confident about retiring

Australians remain optimistic about retiring comfortably, yet their confidence levels significantly lag those of retirement savers in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, according to the latest MFS Global Defined Contribution Participant Survey.

The study, which surveyed over 4,000 people globally, including more than 1,000 who contribute to an Australian superannuation fund, showed 71% of local savers are confident about retiring at a desired age, but less so that their retirement savings will last their lifetime, at 68%.  This contrasts sharply with retirement confidence in the US, the highest of any market, where respectively 84% and 82% of savers are confident in realising their desired retirement age and income adequacy throughout retirement.

Longer working and retirement saving horizons due to COVID, felt most by under 45s

Australian investors are in step with global peers in believing they need to save more and work longer than planned due to COVID-19, particularly those under 45 years old. 64% of this younger cohort in Australia believe that they will need to save more for retirement, while 58% believe they will need to work longer to achieve their retirement savings goals. These younger investors are twice as bullish as their older peers, with 47% taking on ‘significant’ risk to gain a substantial return, compared to 21% of people aged over 45.

Source: MFS Global Retirement Survey, AU respondents.

Retirement age and income adequacy remain ongoing and highly complex discussions for Australia’s wealth industry, perhaps more so given the retirement investing psyche clearly appears quite sensitive and risk averse at present relative to other markets.

The shock and persisting uncertainty caused by the pandemic has undoubtedly left an indelible mark on younger retirement investors, and their concerns need to be properly addressed for them to get back on track, with a deeper appreciation that uncertainty and opportunity are often key to long-term investing.

With a growing spotlight on performance against a backdrop of YFYS policy, pandemic waves and escalating global risks, fostering investor confidence and active engagement in retirement saving decisions, with a focus on risk management, must remain a core objective for the whole, long-term investment industry.

ESG appetite soars within superannuation

Like global investors, Australians want to see more ESG investments in their superannuation fund portfolios, a view expressed by 74% of all local respondents, including 83% of local millennials. Generation X and baby boomers followed with 72% and 65%, respectively.

Source: MFS Global Retirement Survey, AU respondents.

ESG investing continues to transform the way in which investors view and allocate their capital, and while quality long-term, purpose-focused investments inherently integrate ESG, superannuation funds are responding to demand for greater depth and diversity of investments that target change and impact. The associated noise however can be intense, and we see a growing role for advisers to educate investors on the many shades of green and ESG within offerings, along with pointing out the differences between asset managers that integrate ESG into their overall investment approach and those that approach it strictly from a product perspective.

Superannuation advice gaps 

Australian respondents are also the most unsure about what levels of return to expect on their retirement savings and at what rate are they likely to withdraw funds during retirement, factors potentially contributing to low confidence levels. Almost one-third (32%) rely on their superannuation fund to help them make retirement contribution and planning decisions, 30% turn to a family member, while only 29% receive professional advice. Just over half of advised people elected their planner based on fees, followed by years of experience and retirement planning expertise. 46% of all prefer to receive advice in-person with their planner, including video calls.

Applying a gender lens, 34% of men turned to a financial adviser for retirement advice, compared to 24% of women.

Sources, quality and consistency of advice vary widely. We see enormous potential for advisers to provide a greater and more specialist role in providing asset allocation advice to superannuants, especially women who remain under-advised despite their working lives typically being more varied and punctuated by life events.

Concept of retirement is evolving

The survey found that the average Australian expects to retire at the age of 60.7 years; however, almost one quarter (24%) expect this to be closer to 71 or older. Only 13% expect a hard stop retirement, with the overwhelming majority (57%) expecting to reduce working hours or switch jobs.

Source: MFS Global Retirement Survey, AU respondents.

Our research shows that retirement is not the hard stop, party event that some may have once envisaged. The findings, gleaned through multiple waves of COVID, are a reminder that retirement is an evolving concept shaped by a myriad of factors, which will continue to change the composition and delivery of wealth management and financial advice.

 

Marian Poirier is Senior Managing Director, Head of Australia and New Zealand at MFS Investment Management. These views are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to purchase any security or as a solicitation or investment advice. No forecasts can be guaranteed. This article is issued in Australia by MFS International Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 68 607 579 537, AFSL 485343), a sponsor of Firstlinks.

For more articles and papers from MFS, please click here.

Unless otherwise indicated, logos and product and service names are trademarks of MFS® and its affiliates and may be registered in certain countries.

 

About the MFS 2021 Global Defined Contribution Member Survey

Dynata, an independent third-party research provider, conducted a study among Defined Contribution (DC) plan participants in the US, Canada, UK, and Australia on behalf of MFS. MFS was not identified as the sponsor of the study.

To qualify, DC plan participants had to be ages 18+, employed at least part-time, active workplace retirement plan participants / members: in the US, actively contributing to a 401(k), 403(b), 457, or 401(a) / in Canada, actively contributing to DC Pension Plan, Group Registered Retirement Savings Plan, Deferred Profit Sharing Plan, Non-Registered Group Savings Plan, or Simplified Employee Pension Plan / in the UK, actively contributing to a Defined Contribution Scheme, Master Trust, or Individual Savings Account. / in Australia, actively contributing to an industry, retail, corporate or public sector super fund or a self-managed super fund. Data weighted to mirror the age / gender distribution of the workforce in each country.

1,020 US, 1,012 Canadian, 1,017 UK and 1,011 Australian plan participants answered the survey, which was fielded between March 31 – April 13, 2021.

 

  •   12 January 2022
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
George
January 12, 2022

We have a world-leading super and pension system, and the US has a far inferior version, a shocking public health system and far more people living in poverty or jail. Yet they are more confident about retirement. We have a sales job to do here on how good our system is.

Lisa
January 12, 2022

Think our media and vested interests like financial planners and super funds like to ensure uncertainty to encourage their interests. Then there are the unrealistic lifestyle expectations for some - overseas trips, manicures, iPhones etc. Those who have been spenders and not savers can also be in for a shock, especially if still renting. Hopefully years of compulsory superannuation contributions will help. Our aged pension is great for a modest lifestyle for a home owner, but tight otherwise.

Jason
January 13, 2022

Most Australian defined benefit pension sustems were abolished decades ago whereas in the US many are benefitting from these generous systems, in particular government employees who may also have 401k (super) plans as well. In addition many employees in the US have solid insurance plans including income protection and TPD insurance. In Australia these employer backed systems were abolished and now we rely on flakey private insurance products that become prohibitively expensive once you enter your 50s with centrelink disability pensions almost impossible to access. A Brickie with a destroyed back is expected to go and drive a taxi and would not be entitled to a pension unless they can prove incapacity to work in any occupation.

Also, in the US the old aged pension is means tested and considered an entitlemt for continuous employment which could be up to $1000 a week.. In other words many consider it as a base income in addition to any defined benefit pension which allows them to take on more risk with any 401 K savings and hence get a better .return.

Our old age pension is meagre and quickly cuts out if you have some assets. If you are old and renting, with meagre savings forget it. Remember when Hockey tried to lift the eligibility age to 70 and try to cut the indexing to CPI rather than wages? Someone will try to cut it again.

Americans are also have a Medicare system , but it only applies when you are ollder.

Also, home investment bias has been very kind to US investors.

The reason why Australians are worried is because we should be. Most safety nets here have been removed , or privatised.. Australians don't find out how naked they are until there is a crisis, eg main breadwinner gets Parkinson's diagnosis in early 60s when they were planning to retire at 72.

Now we hear that future investment returns wll be mediocre.We have to manage our own sequencing and longevity risk at the same time as betting our futures on the stock market. We are expectedd to work and save like mad at the same time as running a massive mortgage as banks know that they can go for your super if you default.







Ruth
January 13, 2022

If I choose to invest in a passively invested fund, it angers me to know that these large funds have significant voting rights. I don't believe that the personal wishes of representatives should be involved in voting in my name or any other shareholder's. That is not passive investing and I don't want to pay for their involvement. There regulatory controls by governments. I want the boards to consist of people who know something about their own industry, not people appointing proxy advisers etc.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

REIT sectors are different, faced with fundamentals and inflation

'OK Boomer' responses keep on coming

Responses to the 'OK Boomer' poll

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.