Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 80

Tax and the financial planning process

With the forthcoming Government White Paper on the Australian tax system and some comments that the Murray Inquiry made with respect to tax and the financial system, it is timely to have a look at where tax fits into financial planning.

An indicator of a good tax system overall, as the public finance economists love to say, is that tax should not impact on economic behaviour. Or, to put that another way, taxes should not ‘distort’ economic activity, which in the context of financial planning, means taxes should not ‘distort’ where individuals save because, after all, financial planning is just saving and investing.

All very well in theory. However, this is not the case in the real world and taxes can have a significant effect on how individuals save. In fact, the Murray Inquiry highlighted six different ways in which the Australian tax system distorts the way individuals save and it is these that will come under review with the Government White Paper.

So what are they and how do they affect the way a person saves?

  1. Tax affects asset selection by individuals. That is, tax impacts on which assets an individual (or SMSF) will hold. Probably the best example of this is Australian company shares that pay imputation credits. Investors will actively seek out this class of investment specifically to get the tax effect of dividend imputation.
  2. Taxes affect asset allocation by individuals. That is, tax impacts how much a person will invest in or allocate their savings to each type or class of asset. Perhaps the outstanding example of this is the family home, which is tax exempt and is the asset class owned by the majority of Australians.
  3. Tax affects how much individuals will borrow. The Henry Review noted that the Australian tax system of negative gearing actually incentivised people to ‘gear up’ for favourable tax advantages.
  4. Tax affects asset location. In other words, tax affects where the assets are held. SMSFs are the best example, and they have become the preferred holding vehicle for many people’s wealth.
  5. Tax affects whether individuals will invest directly or use a financial intermediary. The tax affects here can be subtle, such as the use of carry forward tax losses, which is not as effective in financial intermediaries when compared with investing directly. Some retail and industry superannuation funds do not handle the transition from accumulation to pension efficiently when compared with SMSFs.
  6. The Australian tax system affects when to dispose of an asset. Individuals get a 50% tax discount and SMSFs get a one-third tax discount if they wait at least 12 months before disposing of the asset.

Although the theory is that the tax system should have no bearing on how people save and invest, these six differences will come under serious scrutiny by both Murray and the Government White Paper.


Gordon Mackenzie is a Senior Lecturer in taxation and business law at the Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales.

Warren Bird
April 17, 2015

This website, which quotes ABS Census stats, confirms the accuracy of Gordon's statement.

April 17, 2015

The family home is not owned by the majority of Australians. In my suburb Western suburbs Perth) it is approx 33% owned, 33% mortgage and 33 % renters. In the younger age group I know in other suburbs they are renters, mortgage stress (interest only ) or living at home with parents, please explain your facts a bit more clearly.

Mike Timmers
September 26, 2014

It is true that availability of imputation credits is frequently said to affect asset selection (ala point 1 in this article) - of Australian tax residents at least. But should it? Since an imputation credit is a fully refundable tax offset think of it like this - the paying company is distributing that part of its profit on a pre-tax basis and the franking amount has been withheld and remitted to the Tax Office as a type of prepayment of the shareholder's ultimate tax liability. As such dividends could be considered equivalent to other investment incomes, for example such as trust distributions and interest on deposits which are paid from pre-tax profits - which could have tax withheld and remitted to the ATO where the investor fails to provide a TFN or ABN. In this way the gross return from those forms of investments can be compared on a like-for-like basis. What is important is the gross income yield, not so much the tax prepayment represented by the tax withholding.

Of course shares carry a prospect for capital growth as well as risk of loss, compared with a cash deposit, which should be considered in the investor's risk-return equation.

Bruce Bennett
September 23, 2014

If negative gearing is to remain a part of the Australian taxation system, should its scope be limited and its benefits spread more widely? For example, in the case of residential or commercial real estate only allowing negative gearing for investments in new property or, in the case of equities, limiting it to investments in new infrastructure funds.


Leave a Comment:



Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

SMSFs, member-direct and Labor's franking

Retained profits a conspiracy against super and pension funds


Most viewed in recent weeks

How to enjoy your retirement

Amid thousands of comments, tips include developing interests to keep occupied, planning in advance to have enough money, staying connected with friends and communities ... should you defer retirement or just do it?

Results from our retirement experiences survey

Retirement is a good experience if you plan for it and manage your time, but freedom from money worries is key. Many retirees enjoy managing their money but SMSFs are not for everyone. Each retirement is different.

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Fear is good if you are not part of the herd

If you feel fear when the market loses its head, you become part of the herd. Develop habits to embrace the fear. Identify the cause, decide if you need to take action and own the result without looking back. 

Latest Updates


The paradox of investment cycles

Now we're captivated by inflation and higher rates but only a year ago, investors were certain of the supremacy of US companies, the benign nature of inflation and the remoteness of tighter monetary policy.


Reporting Season will show cost control and pricing power

Companies have been slow to update guidance and we have yet to see the impact of inflation expectations in earnings and outlooks. Companies need to insulate costs from inflation while enjoying an uptick in revenue.


The early signals for August company earnings

Weaker share prices may have already discounted some bad news, but cost inflation is creating wide divergences inside and across sectors. Early results show some companies are strong enough to resist sector falls.


The compelling 20-year flight of SYD into private hands

In 2002, the share price of the company that became Sydney Airport (SYD) hit 80 cents from the $2 IPO price. After 20 years of astute investment driving revenue increases, it sold to private hands for $8.75 in 2022.

Investment strategies

Ethical investing responding to some short-term challenges

There are significant differences in the sector weightings of an ethical fund versus an index, and while this has caused some short-term headwinds recently, the tailwinds are expected to blow over the long term.

Investment strategies

If you are new to investing, avoid these 10 common mistakes

Many new investors make common mistakes while learning about markets. Losses are inevitable. Newbies should read more and develop a long-term focus while avoiding big mistakes and not aiming to be brilliant.

Investment strategies

RMBS today: rising rate-linked income with capital preservation

Lenders use Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities to finance mortgages and RMBS are available to retail investors through fund structures. They come with many layers of protection beyond movements in house prices. 



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.