Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 206

Is it time to review your super pension?

The financial media is replete with advice on the new super laws. Advisers, accountants, SMSFs specialists (myself included) and product providers are flat out getting ready in time.

The $1.6 million transfer balance cap is receiving most attention as existing pension balances will be measured on 1 July 2017. If your pension balance is under $1.6 million, you may think you don’t need to worry about it, but what if you and your spouse have over $1.6 million between you?

Importance of dealing with transfer balance cap

In this circumstance, if one of you dies and the survivor wants to keep the assets in the advantageous superannuation environment, the transfer balance cap becomes very relevant.

Check how the pension is structured to be paid out after a death. Under the transfer balance cap rules, where the pension is not ‘reversionary’, but the surviving spouse elects to receive the benefit as a pension, the balance will count towards that spouse’s cap straight away, and that could tip his or her pension transfer balance over $1.6 million. This will need to be dealt with as soon as possible.

In the past, a surviving spouse was able to roll over a pension from a deceased spouse (known as a ‘death benefit pension’) after a specified time period (six months from date of death, or three months from grant of probate). This provision has been removed and it will always be a death benefit pension and unable to be rolled over.

So, if you receive a death benefit pension from your spouse which results in you exceeding your $1.6 million transfer balance cap, the only way to keep the money in the superannuation system is to roll your own pension back to accumulation.

A ‘reversionary’ pension, on the other hand, will not be assessed to the surviving spouse for 12 months from the date of death, buying a bit of time before having to deal with the excess. The same issues arise, but you have a year to figure out what to do.

Correct set-up makes a difference

Hence, setting up the pension correctly while you’re alive can make all the difference to your spouse on your death. Let me put that into a case study to illustrate.

On 1 July 2017, Brian, 76, has an account-based pension valued at $1,400,000, while his wife, Jenny’s, 72, is worth $900,000. Both pensions are ‘reversionary’ to each other.

On 25 July 2017, Brian passes away. His pension is valued at $1,380,000 and continues uninterrupted to Jenny. Technically, Jenny’s total pension balance is now over $1.6 million, however, the reversionary pension will not count towards Jenny’s cap until 25 July 2018, giving her time to consider her options.

Jenny cannot roll over any of Brian’s pension, she can elect to roll over some or all of her pension to accumulation. She decides to roll over enough to bring her transfer balance cap to $1.6 million.

Jenny’s Transfer Balance Cap

Had Brian’s pension not been reversionary, Jenny would have had to deal with this soon after his death, at a difficult time for her. Being reversionary also gives tax free income and capital gains for an extra year. Jenny has time to decide that the assets supporting her own pension should be sold before being transferred to accumulation.

If Brian’s balance was over $1.6 million, Jenny would have no choice but to commute the amount over $1.6 million to a lump sum payment, and transfer her whole balance back to accumulation.

If both partners are still in accumulation phase, what happens if one dies? This is similar to a non-reversionary pension. If a surviving spouse elects to take the benefits as a pension, the value of the pension account will count immediately towards his or her transfer balance cap.

Can anyone be nominated to receive a reversionary pension on my death?

A death benefit pension can only be paid to a:

  • Spouse, including de facto and same sex partner
  • Person who was financially dependent on the deceased
  • Person who had an interdependency relationship with the deceased person, and
  • Child, including adopted, step and ex-nuptial, who is under 18, over 18 with a disability, or 18 to 24 and financially dependent on the deceased.

Next time you’re in for an investment review, speak to your adviser about the structure of your pension. It may need some tweaking.


Alex Denham is a Senior Adviser with Dartnall Advisers. Prior to becoming an adviser, she spent 20 years in senior technical roles with several financial services companies. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual and is based on a current understanding of the rules.



Leave a Comment:



Timing on transfer balance cap and CGT relief

Minister Jane Hume on SMSFs and superannuation reform

When the $1.6m cap is no longer relevant


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates


How to enjoy your retirement

Amid thousands of comments, tips include developing interests to keep occupied, planning in advance to have enough money, stay connected with friends and the community ... should you defer retirement or just do it?


Results from our retirement experiences survey

Retirement is a good experience if you plan for it and manage your time, but freedom from money worries is key. Many retirees enjoy managing their money but SMSFs are not for everyone. Each retirement is different.


Why short-termism is both a travesty and an opportunity

On any given day, whether the stockmarket rises or falls is a coin toss, but stay invested for 10 years and the odds are excellent. It's at times of market selloffs that opportunities present for long-term investors.

Investment strategies

Fear is good if you are not part of the herd

If you feel fear when the market loses its head, you become part of the herd. Develop habits to embrace the fear. Identify the cause, decide if you need to take action and own the result without looking back. 

No excuses: Plan now for recession

The signs of a coming recession are building, especially in the US. In personal and business decisions, it's time to be more conservative and engage in risk management until some of the uncertainty is resolved. 


The fall of Volt Bank removes another bank competitor

The startup banks were supposed to challenge the lazy, oligopolistic major banks, but 86 400, Xinja and now Volt have gone. Why did Volt disappear so quickly when it had gained deposit support and name recognition?


Three main challenges to online ads and ‘surveillance capitalism’

Surveillance capitalism refers to the collection and use of consumer data to further profits. Will a renewed focus on privacy change the online-ad business model, or is it too entrenched?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.