Home / 190

Trust alternatives after 1 July super changes

Given the impending superannuation changes, it's worth taking a fresh look at estate and superannuation succession planning arrangements.

Background

From 1 July 2017, individuals will be able to have a maximum of $1.6 million in the tax-free pension stage of superannuation. Amounts surplus to the $1.6 million need to either be rolled back to the accumulation stage of superannuation (tax rate of 15% applies to income and 10% to capital gains) or withdrawn from superannuation where earnings may be taxed at personal marginal tax rates.

To illustrate the changes and new opportunities, consider the following example:

  • High net worth retired couple, Simon and Danielle, both age 65 with an SMSF total balance of $3.5 million ($1.6 million for Simon and $1.9 million for Danielle). The SMSF is entirely in pension phase so no tax applies.
  • Simon also has an investment portfolio valued at $2 million outside super.
  • Simon passes away in June 2017.
  • They have two minors as grandchildren who do not have any other income.
  • SMSF succession arrangements are such that Danielle can take Simon’s balance as a reversionary pension, lump-sum payment directed to the estate or Danielle, or a combination of the above (the precise mechanics of this will be discussed in another article).
  • For simplicity, assume an earnings rate of 5% (all income, no franking credits) on investments regardless of entity holding assets.

Pre-1 July 2017 consequences

a) Before Simon’s death

In a pre-1 July 2017 world, there is no tax on earnings within the SMSF as it is all in pension stage. Simon pays tax at his marginal rate on his $2 million personal investment portfolio.

b) After Simon’s death

Danielle continues Simon’s pension as reversionary and inherits the $2 million personal portfolio directly. The tax position is the same as when Simon was alive.

Post-1 July 2017 consequences after Simon’s death

Option 1 - Super roll back

Danielle can hold a maximum of $1.6 million in the pension phase. In this example, we assume that the balance above this amount is rolled back to the accumulation stage. Danielle inherits the $2 million share portfolio and pays tax at her marginal rate.

Option 2 - Withdraw excess from superannuation

As a superannuation tax dependant, Danielle is paid a tax-free lump sum death benefit of $1.6 million of Simon’s benefit, withdraws $300,000 of her benefit, and retains a total of $1.6 million in pension stage. The funds withdrawn from the SMSF are invested in Danielle’s name alongside the inherited $2 million portfolio and taxed at her marginal rate.

Option 3 - Super roll-back and share portfolio directed to a testamentary trust

[Note: A testamentary trust is a trust which arises upon the death of the testator, and which is specified in his or her will].

This strategy is a combination of the above two with a twist!

  • $1.6 million stays in pension stage
  • The excess over $1.6 million in the SMSF is rolled back to accumulation stage
  • The $2 million investment portfolio is directed to a testamentary trust with flexibility to distribute income to Danielle and potentially two minor grandchildren who have no other income.

Conclusion

In a pre-1 July 2017 world, it was often best to continue a reversionary pension to the surviving spouse given that all earnings would continue to be 100% tax-free. In these circumstances, testamentary trusts may have had limited appeal.

However, from 1 July 2017, given that high superannuation balances will be excluded from the zero-tax pension environment, an individual’s overall tax position may be optimised by using testamentary trusts for estate assets. This, when combined with careful superannuation succession planning, can lead to significantly better outcomes.

 

Reuben Zelwer is the Principal of Adapt Wealth Management Pty Ltd. Reuben is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER® practitioner and an SMSF Specialist Advisor™. This article is for education purposes and does not consider the circumstances of any person, and is based on an understanding of the legislation at the time of writing.

RELATED ARTICLES

When the $1.6m cap is no longer relevant

Limits to a will’s power over an SMSF

What is the new work test exemption?

10 Comments

Andrew Ledingham

February 18, 2017

Great strategy!

Rahul Singh

February 18, 2017

Nice article Reuben and some nice strategical considerations.

With the removal of the less than 10% test, further strategy considerations can be entertained if Danielle is aged somewhere between 65-75 and meets the work test to enable superannuation contributions.

If she meets the work rest, this enables a deductible contribution of up to $25,000 (or whatever the concessional contribution cap is at the time) thus providing an opportunity to save tax on taxable income. Bearing in mind, SG, if she receives any, eats into her concessional contributions cap.

Of course if she is under 65, then no work test required.

Reuben Zelwer

February 17, 2017

Peter, we are not rolling back Simon's pension account to superannuation. Simon's $1.6mn is continuing as a reversionary pension to Danielle. Danielle (Survivor) is the one who is able to rollover her pension balance ($1.9 million) back to accumulation stage - or withdraw it. In hindsight, I should have made this clearer

peter matters

February 17, 2017

Now I am confused. I read that the deceased spouse pension account could not be rolled back to the surviving spouse accumulation account, and had to be paid out of the super fund. This was the reason I started looking at a testamentary trust.

Reuben Zelwer

February 17, 2017

Yes Randall. I'm not necessarily a big fan of BDBNs unless the situation specifically warrants it. I think maximum flexibility in the new super world is best.

Randall

February 17, 2017

Thanks for the response Reuben. So here perhaps a good solution with your twist is for Simon to have 4 young grandkids who each draw down via the trust $20,542 each year which would ensure the tax free status for a few more years yet. More seriously, the changes do mean that couples each with more than $1.6m in super have to review their BDNs and wills if they want to minimise taxes and/or also use avenues such as Testamentary trusts for the benefit of any grandkids.

Graham

February 16, 2017

Interesting article - as both Simon & Danielle would qualify for the Seniors & Pensioners Tax Offset (SAPTO) I would expect their personal tax liability to be significantly less than that shown in the article.

Randall

February 16, 2017

Thanks for a good article Ruben on something I have been pondering over quite a bit. One question please which is what is basis that Simon's super can remain in super on his death? Since Danielle is over the $1.6m limit I would have expected that once the 12 months period of grace has expired after Simon's death, all of his super would have to be taken out.

Phil Brady

February 16, 2017

I think that's covered in option 1 post July 17 scenario

Reuben

February 16, 2017

Simons super of $1.6mn reverts to Danielle as a recessionary pension. Danielle is then able to roll her $1.9 million benefit back to the accumulation phase. But you are quite right that If Simon had say $1.9 million in super, then Danielle could only take $1.6 as a reversionary pension and the extra $300k would need to come out as a death benefit lump sum


 

Leave a Comment:

     

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirees facing steep increases for basic items

ASFA has updated its tables on how much money is needed for a 'comfortable' or 'modest' lifestyle in retirement, but there are some unavoidable prices rising well ahead of inflation.

Let’s stop calling them ‘bond proxies’

With cash and term deposit rates at all-time lows, and fixed interest bonds not much better, investors are looking for ‘bond proxies’ to deliver more income. But is ‘proxy’ a misnomer, and what are they anyway?

Adele Ferguson on ‘Banking Bad’ and weaving magic

The journalist most responsible for the calling of the Royal Commission takes care not to be roped in by everyone with a complaint to push. It takes experienced judgement to gather the right information.

Six warning bells against property spruikers

Property spruikers use common techniques, and con men will increasingly target older people who feel they do not have enough financial independence for their retirement years.

Helping your children build their super

It has become more difficult to build large superannuation balances with contribution caps and more people paying off home loans for longer. How can wealthy parents help their adult children?

OpenInvest

banner

Sponsors

Alliances

Special eBooks

Specially-selected collections of the best articles 

Read more

Earn CPD Hours

Accredited CPD hours reading Firstlinks

Read more

Pandora Archive

Firstlinks articles are collected in Pandora, Australia's national archive.

Read more