Home / 249

Are two SMSFs worth the bother?

Following the introduction of the $1.6 million transfer balance cap, many clients have asked whether it may be desirable to start a second SMSF to quarantine different benefit types and maximise their overall superannuation benefits. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has advised that it may not look kindly upon such arrangements. However, the ATO must treat each case on its merits.

Why consider such an arrangement? Most strategies centre on the principle of separating accumulation and pension benefits in order to maintain or grow the tax-free (pension) component in a separate fund. This makes sense if particular assets are expected to grow at a higher rate or generate more income than others. However, the ATO has the discretion to argue that Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act (ITAA) applies in circumstances where a taxpayer has structured their affairs with the sole or primary purpose of avoiding tax, therefore there should be a greater objective at stake.

Administration costs and CGT

The total amount you can transfer to an income stream is capped at $1.6 million, although this amount can grow or decline in value without being assessed against the cap again (unless you make substitutions). Many retirees are keen to quarantine their high-yielding assets in this tax-free pension phase, and leave lower earning assets in the accumulation phase where income is taxed at 15%.

If you have an SMSF, generally earnings on your pension and accumulation accounts are assessed proportionately for tax purposes, which means you can’t allocate your higher-earning assets to the pension account and the lower-earning assets to your accumulation account. If you have two separate funds, different assets (and therefore their earnings) are segregated (for example, property in one fund and equities in another). However, you will have to pay two sets of administration costs, which could exceed the amount saved in tax payable on the different earnings.

If your fund is already fully or partly in pension phase, and you wish to set up another fund, not only would additional establishment and administration fees apply, but the sale or transfer of any assets from the existing fund to the new fund could create a capital gains tax (CGT) event. Capital gains in pension phase are generally tax-free, so this would be mostly relevant for accumulation interests. Stamp duty may be payable depending on the asset and the jurisdiction in which the transfer occurred.

Public offer funds

Many investors have a public offer fund in addition to their SMSF. This may be due to their employment arrangements, longstanding defined benefit schemes, or to retain insurance policies. While many individuals will roll these benefits into their SMSF at retirement, there may be incentives to retain these arrangements with a public offer fund, which will effectively quarantine the assets within this account. Others may consider establishing a new SMSF. While CGT and stamp duty issues are relevant only to the extent that they would apply in the public offer fund, the same considerations regarding purpose apply (i.e. the purpose is not the avoidance or minimisation of tax).

It should be noted that those SMSFs where no member has a balance greater than $1.6 million including in both accumulation and pension accounts can still use the segregated method if they wish, which would allow the allocation of different assets and their earnings to occur. In this scenario, holding all assets in pension phase is the most tax-effective option, although there may be other reasons for individuals to retain accumulation accounts. Additionally, public offer funds such as wrap accounts may not be subject to these accounting requirements and therefore segregation opportunities may be available.

If you wish to pursue a strategy of having two SMSFs, consider your objectives and the purpose for doing so in light of the ATO’s position. Some individuals may wish to have one fund with a spouse and another with children from a previous marriage or for the purpose of holding real property with business associates, others may wish to hold their assets in different funds for other reasons.

Whatever the objective, it is critical to seek advice given the ATO’s concern about the strategy, and the general costs and complexity of adding additional structures to your financial affairs.


Gemma Dale is Director, SMSF & Investor Behaviour at nabtrade, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. Any advice and information contained in this article has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.


8 hints for any SMSF in both accumulation and pension modes

More detail on the $1.6m Transfer Balance Cap

When the $1.6m cap is no longer relevant


Tony R

May 01, 2018

One reason I can see for this process is that the tax components are locked in when the pension is established and a tax free pension percentage is set for the life of the pension account. If you add contributions which can either be concessional or non-concessional, this will alter the percentage depending on what type they are. That is why you re-establish the pension to recalculate and reset the tax percentage.


May 01, 2018

Has the superannuation industry raised with the Federal Government the current legislative requirements that make it difficult for superannuants in pension mode to add concessional contributions to their retirement funds?

I understand that when the $1.6 million cap was introduced for pension accounts, members were still allowed to make concessional contributions (up to $25,000p.a.) provided they met an age and work test.

However, when I spoke to my Industry Super Fund they told me that current superannuation legislation does not allow additional concessional contributions to be credited directly to a members pension account. They told me I had to:
1. Open a new Accumulation Account with my Industry Super Fund and deposit my concessional contributions into it, then
2. Open a new Pension Account with the same Super Fund, and finally
3. Transfer the funds from my existing Pension Account and the Accumulation Account into the new Pension Account.

Can anyone explain why the Government makes it so difficult to top up a pension account with concessional contributions? Wouldn't it be simpler if Superannuation Funds could accept concessional contributions directly into an existing pension account and advise the ATO when the contributions are received.


April 22, 2018

Wrong way to think about it. The Treasurer gave those with more than $1.6m in their Super Fund two choices - take the excess out or roll it back to Accumulation. No brainer for most in that position - Accumulation at 15% tax rate. I would suggest therefore, the decision to "split" a fund into "Pension" and "Accumulation" accounts was, in effect, the Treasurers

The next decision is whether to establish the new account within an existing SMSF or establish a new, additional, SMSF - again in my view, a no brainer. Total clarity as to what is in each account, the ability to apply different investment strategies and I suspect very little difference in costs as the accounting will be quite simple.

Yes there is some extra admin however there is no tax trickery in such a strategy


April 19, 2018

Given the overdue light being thrown on ATO behaving with small businesses as if it is a rule unto itself, the threatened use of Part IVA to punish those moving to split their SMSFs is draconian at best, and self-defeating at worst. It will sap public confidence that underwrites our self-assessent system, and eventually victimise the real payer - the citizen.

Whilst abuse and avoidance must be tackled robustly, ATO's current practices of acting as an extra-constitutional authority must be curbed. It routinely and condescendingly says in its publications that it will not penalise taxpayers who rely on ATO input. Rule of law woud require it should be penalised for giving such input.

Unless, at a stretch, the taxpayer can reciprocally use anti-avoidance against ATO ("you, ATO, confected a scheme to extract additional revenues beond Parliamentary intent") the current impasse will continue.


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

Most investors are wrong on dividend yield as income

The current yield on a share or trust is simply the latest dividend divided by the current share price, an abstract number at a point in time. What really matters is the income delivered in the long run.

My 10 biggest investment management lessons

A Chris Cuffe classic article that never ages. Every experienced investor develops a set of beliefs about how markets operate.

Seven major trends affecting Australians in retirement

Retirement planning will become increasingly complex in the face of trends in home ownership, wealth dispersion, life expectancy, health and aged care costs, work patterns and pension dependency.

Lessons from the Future Fund for retail investors

The Annual Report from Australia's sovereign wealth fund reveals new ways it is investing in fixed income and alternatives. The Fund considers its portfolio as one overall risk position with downside protection in one asset class allowing more risk in another.

Four companies riding the healthcare boom

There are strong demographic trends in ageing and consumer spending and investing in the right healthcare companies can ride this wave as well as produce better health outcomes for people. 

Five reasons SMSFs are making asset allocation changes

Substantial changes are underway in SMSFs which until recently held a narrow range of assets dominated by cash, term deposits and Australian equities. Trustees have never faced so many choices.




Special eBooks

Specially-selected collections of the best articles 

Read more

Earn CPD Hours

Accredited CPD hours reading Firstlinks

Read more

Pandora Archive

Firstlinks articles are collected in Pandora, Australia's national archive.

Read more