Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 19

Understand yourself before you understand the market

“Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism and die on euphoria.”

This quote from Sir John Templeton, who was referred to by Money Magazine as ‘arguably the greatest stock picker of the 20th century’, highlights that emotional factors such as optimism and pessimism may influence or even drive market cycles and ultimately individual investor experience.

How investors ‘behave’ can have a significant impact on their overall success as an investor. After all, a market only rises when there are more buyers than sellers, and only falls when there are more sellers than buyers.

Behavioural finance is the field of science that studies how the mind works when it comes to dealing with money. It seeks to understand what factors influence individuals to make certain investment decisions.

This is an introduction to behavioural finance along with some ideas that investors might want to consider to help manage some of the emotions around investing.

Every finance expert knows that Modern Portfolio Theory includes the assumption that investors are rational. Yet as we engage with investors, we know that behind the rational façade lies the emotional and irrational world of individual investor behaviour.

Following are five behaviours which are driven more by emotions than facts, influencing investor decisions and contributing to investment mistakes.

1. Loss aversion – desire to avoid the pain of a loss

Simply stated, no one wants to lose money. Loss aversion is the pain felt when an investor has experienced a loss in the past, and doesn’t want to revisit that experience again. In tests conducted by Kahnemann and Tversky, pain from making a financial loss was proven to significantly outweigh the pleasure made from making a financial gain. For investors, an example is the reduction in share portfolio values experienced as a result of the Global Financial Crisis. The subsequent retention of large holdings of cash in investor portfolios and reluctance to re-enter equity markets, despite strong valuation support and improved market performance, highlights this.

2. Anchoring – holding fast to the past

Anchoring is the tendency to use a previous decision as the key input to a future decision rather than taking into account new or more relevant information. This occurs not only in the field of investments, but in purchasing decisions of all kinds. The negative reaction of Australian consumers to higher petrol prices might largely be as a result of their previous experience of lower petrol prices, rather than a reflection of the market price determined by the level of supply and demand.

3. Herding – our tendency to follow the crowd

Market swings are often the most obvious form of herding, as investors pile in or out of investments together. Many will recall the tech bubble in 2000, when investors piled into tech stocks, often disregarding the fundamentals of the investment. Subsequently, as the value of tech stocks retreated in 2001, the herd followed by selling out. Good technology companies with sound businesses were sold off along with those companies with unsustainable business models. The herd moved on and provided professional long term investors with the opportunity to buy excellent businesses at low prices.

History has shown it is difficult, if not impossible, to time markets. Investors who take their cue from the herd risk buying high and selling low, like during the tech bubble, which is the opposite of the approach they should take.

Sir John Templeton reflected on this, saying: “to buy when others are despondently selling and to sell when others are avidly buying requires the greatest fortitude and pays the greatest ultimate rewards.”

4. Availability bias – most recent is most relevant

A survey conducted by Franklin Templeton Investments in 2010 through to 2012 highlights the impact of availability bias on investors. The survey asked US investors how the stock market had finished the previous year. Whilst 2008 produced a significant negative result for the S&P500, the subsequent years from 2009 to 2011 produced positive years. Yet approximately half or more of those surveyed each subsequent year thought the market had been negative or flat. In the absence of accurate information their brains drew on the information available to them, even though it was no longer current.

5. Mental accounting – the value of money varies with the circumstances

One of the early researchers on behavioural finance, Richard Thaler, coined the phrase ‘mental accounting’ to explain how people treat money differently depending on where it comes from. Earned money is often invested more cautiously than unexpected ‘bonus’ funds from a tax refund, inheritance or lotto win. These ‘bonuses’ are often splurged on excesses or invested in high risk/high reward investments rather than being allocated to an existing savings and investment plan.

By understanding and recognising that as investors we are not always rational, how then can we invest or advise investors with confidence?

Firstly, try to understand your own biases. What combination of reason and emotion influences your approach to investing? Knowledge of these will help you manage your own responses to different investment experiences.

Secondly, have a long term plan. A financial plan acts as a roadmap and forms the basis of any sound, long term investment strategy. A plan also provides a reference point in times of emotional investing stress. Research shows that investors with a written plan are more successful and more satisfied with their investments.[i]

Thirdly, take time to make decisions. Allowing time to reflect rather than rushing in prematurely and discovering that the buzz often associated with making an investment is not always followed by the euphoria of investment success.

And finally, don’t underestimate the value of seeking professional advice and assistance.

For further reading:

  • Franklin Templeton Investments, Breaking the Cycle of Investment Regret, 2013.
  • Kahneman and Tversky, Mental Accounting Matters, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12:183-206 (1999).
  • Dan Ariely, Predictably Irrational.
  • The 2012 Franklin Templeton Global Investor Sentiment Survey designed in partnership with Duke University Professor Dan Ariely and Qualtrics.

Footnote i: Ipsos Reid, Value of Advice Survey, October 4, 2011. Based on supporting data from Canadian Financial Monitor data.


Jim McKay is Director of Advisory Services at Franklin Templeton Investments.



Leave a Comment:



'FOMO' is driving residential property prices, not yields

Expect disappointment as values become stretched


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.