Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 10

UNPRI ready to go to the next level

Responsible investment is one of the biggest investment trends of the 21st century. In part, this is driven by the realisation that the world around us is changing rapidly. Food, water and energy security, natural resource scarcity, climate change, human rights, labour standards and demographic change have all become material issues for companies, while the financial crisis highlighted the need to foster long-termism within financial markets and improve the alignment of interests across the investment chain. Investment policies and processes now need to evolve to capture a broader range of risks and opportunities, over longer periods of time, than ever before.

Fortunately, a global network of like-minded organisations trying to figure out what all of this means for investment risk and return already exists. Supported by the United Nations, the goal of the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) Initiative is to increase understanding of the relevance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues for the investment community and encourage investors everywhere to be more active owners of the companies in their portfolios. By implementing the PRI’s six Principles and putting responsible investment into practice, some 1,200 signatories to the PRI around the world are at the forefront of creating a more sustainable financial system and helping to prevent the next financial crisis. Never before has the role of the investor in creating an enabling environment for the growth of a sustainable economy been so important. And that’s why, earlier this year, I took up the post of Managing Director at the PRI in London.

On many measures, the PRI has been very successful since its launch in 2006. Signatories manage combined assets of USD $34 trillion, or nearly one-fifth of global capital. It has greatly increased the level of transparency around the activities and capabilities of its signatories. In 2011, nearly 550 of them completed the PRI’s annual reporting and assessment survey outlining how they are putting the Principles of ESG incorporation, active ownership, transparency, collaboration, and disclosure into practice. It has also fostered greater collaboration between investors and supported their engagements with companies and policymakers on ESG issues on a scale simply not possible before. Over 2011/12 alone, signatories contacted more than 1,300 companies via the PRI’s clearing house platform to encourage them to improve their performance or disclosure on ESG issues.

Australian investors are naturally very attuned to environmental and social issues and it should come as no surprise that the PRI’s Australian network, managed by the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI), is one of its largest and fastest growing, with 125 signatories and counting. One quarter of these are superannuation funds, so yours may be among them.

Despite this progress, there is still a long way to go before responsible investment can truly be considered mainstream. We know that the way the market currently works, through the investment chain from asset owners via investment managers to companies, does not always serve the true long-term interests of the millions of ordinary Australians who save through super funds or insurance products. The financial crisis gives the responsible investment community an opportunity – indeed a responsibility – to address sustainability challenges more strategically than it has done to date.

The responsible investment community needs to lift its sights and become more engaged with the nuts-and-bolts of the investment chain, the portfolio-wide implications of ESG externalities, and the stability and health of the market as a whole. Portfolio turnover, performance monitoring periods, benchmarks, fees and real long-term alignment of interest between asset owners, asset managers and companies all need to be part of responsible investment’s territory.

To inform this re-tuning of the investment chain, we need to understand far better how long-term externalities and market failures such as climate change will impact whole portfolios, across asset classes, and how investors can respond. The objective here is to ensure that the whole investment chain is focused consistently on long-term value creation. This should ensure that far greater account is taken of environmental and social sustainability issues than at present.

We also need to explore how far it is in investors’ financial interests to encourage policy action to bring externalised sustainability costs on to companies’ books. For some years now investors have supported strong government action on climate change. We need to strengthen work on climate change, and explore applying the same principle to other issues. All this will not in itself change investors’ fundamental objectives, but it will significantly increase the overlap between investors’ long-term financial interests and environmental or social objectives as seen from the public interest perspective.

Finally, we need to address the functioning and stability of the financial system as a whole. The overriding purpose of superannuation funds and other long-term savings institutions is to deliver financial security in retirement to millions of ordinary people. To do this, these investors depend on markets that are stable, well regulated, transparent and fair. As we have seen, poor governance of the market as a whole can be hugely damaging to long-term investors’ interests. At the policy level, a small number of the largest asset owners are already engaging actively with policy makers and regulators on the new market frameworks that are being put in place in response to the financial crisis. The more institutions become involved in work of this kind, the greater the chance that the re-modelled financial system will be fully aligned with their interests.

This agenda calls for a whole new level of vision and courage from the responsible investment community. We need to apply existing research insights and experience better, develop new tools, re-engage with the leadership levels within investment institutions, collaborate more effectively, and be bolder in allocating resources.

 

Fiona Reynolds is Managing Director of the Principles for Responsible Investment Initiative, based in London.

 

  •   10 April 2013
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

ESG by new means, to new ends

Top 10 ESG issues for 2019

Beyond the acronym, navigating important ESG choices

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.