Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 586

US debt, the weak AUD and the role of super funds

There is one significant observation that is neither well reported nor well understood. Readings of macro numbers sporadically report on it, but they do not delve into its significance or what it means for the flow of investment capital.

What is it?

It is the relentless strength of the USD, the mighty greenback. USD strength shows that the US economy is excessively calling upon and draining the developed world’s capital.

The massive US fiscal, trade and capital account deficits are significantly (and disproportionately) funded by foreigners. The US economy dominates developed world growth, but it requires or feeds off continuous drawings of global capital.

This funding will continue for as long as the US corporate sector shows superior technological advancements over international peers.

A moribund, ageing and over-regulated Europe provides little investment alternative to that of the US. And until Asian economies develop the ability to challenge the US in terms of liquidity and political, accounting and legal security, Australia will continue as a capital provider to the US. 

The consequences are examined below.

US budget deficits and its debt are consuming the world’s capital

Whilst the US economy approximates 30% of world GDP, its government now accounts for 32% of world government debt. Further, as its debt has grown it has burnt through foreign capital providers with Japan, China, UK and even Russia, each of which were large US bond holders at various points over the last 25 years.

The current budget (2024) is presented in the next chart and it shows a deficit of US$1.6 trillion. Inside that deficit, some US$763 billion is interest. This indicates that the US is currently paying (on average) about 2.1% for its debt.


Source: US Treasury, Monthly Treasury Statement, July 2024

It is disturbing to note that if the US government was to pay its current cash rate (4.75%) for its debt, then the interest bill would rise to US$1.5 trillion. Simply stated, the US government cannot afford to pay current short-term interest rates and therefore the Fed needs to get interest rates down and quickly.

The US economy is dynamic, and it has propelled world growth prior to the entry of China, and now India, as alternative growth engines. The US stands well above the developed world in terms of both technological and medical developments, but it has drawn immense sums from its trading and investment partners to do so. It is stunning that 346 million citizens drive a world economy of 8.2 billion people.

The next chart is crucial: it tracks the net international investment position of the US over the last 20 years. This position measures the difference between US overseas owned assets and those held by foreigners in the US. It measures shares, bonds, corporate debt and property etc. and shows that the difference has grown from US$1.66 trillion (deficit) in 2005 to US$22.5 trillion (deficit) in March 2024. About 50% of this net capital deficit is held by foreigners in US bonds.

The transmission effect of these capital flows that fund US government debt is that the USD rises to meet the constant foreign currency inflows. It is a self-perpetuating positive loop for the USD. The more the US needs capital and funding, the higher its currency goes. So too do speculative assets that benefit from US pricing – gold and bitcoin are prime examples.

For Australia (in particular) and other developed economies, this has become a significant problem as the US draws our capital to sustain its growth. That growth is important for the world economy until the developing world takes over.

Indeed, this is shown clearly in the next chart that compares Australia’s real household consumption growth with that of the US household sector. US household consumption has driven both the US and the world economy.

US consumption growth is superior because it has achieved real disposable income growth. Australia’s real disposable income has declined since the covid pandemic.

US consumption has also driven the profitability and therefore the valuations of US listed corporates compared to the rest of the world. Indeed, the US market now represents 72% of the world equity market index. That feature alone draws in massive quantities of index invested capital residing around the world in passive pension funds.

Weak AUD has consequences

So where does Australia sit in the complex funding of the US economy?

With A$3.7 trillion (US$2.5 trillion) of super assets, our superannuation funds are 30% larger than Australia’s GDP. Our large industry funds have no choice but to invest in the US economy. Therefore, they will continue to contribute to the US economy by investing enormous sums into US Treasuries, corporate debt, equities, and infrastructure.

To do so, our super funds must sell AUD to buy USD. This means our currency will remain under selling pressure until the US economy falters or our capital managers can find other regions in which to invest.

Importantly, the international currency market will probably not revalue the AUD against the USD. Our credit rating, our trade surplus, our budget surplus, and our superior national debt position will have little effect on the value of the AUD. Therefore, our investment thought process must adopt as a likely scenario a weak currency outlook and its consequences.

Conclusions and observations

  1. Australia's currency will continue to be undervalued which means that imported inflation remains a concern - cash rates will be held above our international peers;
  2. Whilst the RBA will cut interest rates in 2025, it must be at a lower rate than those seen offshore – to support the AUD;
  3. Mortgage rates will decline through 2025 giving relief to the “mortgaged” household sector – providing an uptick to Australian economic growth in 2025;
  4. Australian inflation will meander downwards, and more cost-of-living support will be needed - expect significant pre-election packages.
  5. Post the US election, the funding of the US economy will become a focus for bond markets in 2025 – any upheaval in bond markets will see a swift return to QE;
  6. If QE returns as policy in the US,  expect Europe to follow. The developed world has far too much debt and cannot support higher interest rates; and
  7. Income returns (over capital growth) will dominate returns to investors – the outlier being the US equity market which continues to draw in passive capital.

My conclusions suggest a volatile outlook for markets in 2025 as the world once again is forced to assess the impacts from and policy responses required to deal with enormous debt levels.

Australia’s debt problem resides in a part of our household sector. Our total household debt is too high,  in a sector of the community which is the core of our future – the youth. The government needs to respond with smart assistance programs that do not further fuel house price rises. An intricate problem that is not being properly debated.

The world (particularly the US) debt problem resides in the government sector and it is most likely that the Fed will revisit its policy response adopted in the 2018 bond tantrum. Other central banks will then surely follow.

 

John Abernethy is Founder and Chairman of Clime Investment Management Limited, a sponsor of Firstlinks. The information contained in this article is of a general nature only. The author has not taken into account the goals, objectives, or personal circumstances of any person (and is current as at the date of publishing).

For more articles and papers from Clime, click here.

 

7 Comments
Alex pollak
November 17, 2024

Excellent note john

Ross Baildon
November 17, 2024

John, a thought provoking article. Thankyou for Sharing!

Barry
November 17, 2024

I don't agree with this sentence: "Simply stated, the US government cannot afford to pay current short-term interest rates and therefore the Fed needs to get interest rates down and quickly."

It doesn't matter how much debt the US government has or what the interest rate is as long as most of that debt is owned by the Federal Reserve. This is because the Federal Reserve just remits all of its profit back to the US Government.

Dudley
November 17, 2024

USA government pays interest to many individuals and entities other than Federal Reserve Banks. They want a competitive risk adjusted rate of interest, else they won't lend to USA government.

John Abernethy
November 17, 2024

Hi Barry,

Thank you for your comment.
Just to clear up any misconception.

The current US cash rate is 4.75% and the yield curve is flat.
The average rate paid on existing US government debt is about 2.1%.
The US Federal Reserve (FED) owns about 25% of US government debt (bonds from 3 QE programs) and it is the largest single holder.

Yes, if the FED owned (say 60%) of US Bonds then higher interest rates may be managed by the FED transmitting the interest back to the government.

It requires a massive QE program (circa $10 trillion) for the FED to become the biggest holder of US bonds. However, there is a precedent and it has been done before - by the Japanese Central Bank.

Neil
November 15, 2024

The comparison of real household disposable income across countries is a cracker. I didn't realise Australia was such an outlier.

Jack
November 15, 2024

This and James' article have different takes on the same theme - US attracting more capital and the implications of that for other countries such as Australia. Since Trump was elected, the market has given its verdict on our prospects and it hasn't been pretty.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why systemic risks from ‘Big Super’ may be overplayed

YourSuper will save $17.9 billion! Surely you’re joshing

Can Australian credit continue to perform?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.