Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 130

What to do with resource stocks

On Monday, 28 September 2015 a broker in the UK put out a research note on Swiss-based Glencore suggesting that equity in the company could be worthless thanks to its US$50 billion debt burden. Shares in the company, which runs over 150 mining, oil production and agricultural assets and employs about 180,000 people, fell by 29%, caused BHP and Rio Tinto to fall 6.7% and 4.6% respectively on one day and contributed to wiping A$50 billion off the market capitalisation of the ASX.

Like all fund managers we follow the resources sector closely, as it is the biggest sector in the ASX after the banks. Over the last year, we have travelled to both the hot and dusty mines of the Pilbara and to the Dickensian dark satanic steel mills of North and Western China. In the press there has been much written about the end of the mining boom, and whilst we see that the boom days are over where marginal mines were making supernormal profits, we don’t see that the wholesale dumping of mining stocks is the right move for investors, especially at current prices.

Resources on the ASX

In pure numbers, metals and mining make up the largest sector on the ASX with 602 mining companies listed. If you exclude the ‘zombie’ companies with market capitalisations less than $20 million, the number reduces to 157 and from this set a mere 16 mining companies listed on the ASX are profitable and pay dividends. Surprisingly, even at the end of the China-led mining boom, there remains A$30 billion of market capitalisation tied up in small unprofitable mining companies.

In any boom there is a transfer of wealth from investors to stock (mining or tech) promoters, stock brokers and service providers (lawyers, bankers and accountants), as hundreds of new companies are spawned. Typically the easiest companies to float are those that either have a project or are exploring for the hot mineral du jour. When I was a chemicals analyst at an international investment bank, I fielded many calls about junior phosphate plays as this was the hot commodity in 2010. Whilst phosphate was a sexy story in 2010, the common theme was very low phosphate ore grades which equate to high processing costs and wildly optimistic estimates of what it would cost to build the necessary infrastructure in the highest cost construction market in the world. For example Legend International (LGDI) estimated that the costs of building their required plant would be only $600 million when the true figure would have been around $1.5 billion, a pretty big ask for a company with $25 million in cash and burning through it at a fast rate. In 2011 this company had a market cap of $200 million and a range of positive broker reports (current market cap $5 million, share price $0.01).

I suspect that for these unprofitable mining companies, the best chance that shareholders have of seeing a return is if their mining hopeful is used by a sexy IT or biotech company as a shell for a backdoor listing on the ASX. Like a stolen Subaru WRX, the ASX-listed shells of tech companies from the late 1990s were re-birthed as mining companies in the mid 2000s and some are likely to turn up as fintech companies in the next few years.

Key factors to look for in resource companies

Prefer the big diversified miners

We prefer to hold our mining exposure in large diversified miners, Rio Tinto and BHP, rather than single commodity stocks such as Newcrest, Fortescue or Alumina. Through the cycle, their diversification by geography and commodity type will give investors fewer headaches than the higher risk pure plays. These companies are well-managed, low cost commodity producers with unhedged reserves in the ground, predominately located in politically secure areas of the world.

Whilst there has been much debate around the sustainability of the dividends for BHP and Rio Tinto, our recent meetings with the management teams post the results in August 2015 gave us comfort as to both the determination of the management teams to maintain these dividends and the ability of the companies to fund them. For example, BHP in 2016 is expected to generate over US$7 billion in free cash flow (after taxes and capital expenditure) which is US$500 million more than the cash flow required to pay a dividend of A$1.75 per share.

Own producers rather than explorers

When investing in junior miners, often one of the best things to do is to sell out before they start producing, as this is when the glorious blue sky is interrupted by the harsh reality of construction cost blowouts or miscalculations as to the mine’s ore grades or levels of impurities become apparent. Further as we happen to prefer actual dividends now to promises, we want to own companies producing now rather than those still building major projects or prospecting.

The dramatic fall in the oil price over the past 12 months highlights the desirability for current cash flows over potentially higher returns in an uncertain future. Cash in hand put companies like Woodside in the position to pay off debt, reward shareholders and buy assets off motivated sellers, whereas Origin Energy’s shareholders are facing a dilutive $2.5 billion capital raising done at a 73% discount to where the company’s share price was one year ago.

Low cost volume wins

Whilst higher cost iron ore miners may give the investor the greatest upside exposure to recovering markets, they also give the strong possibility that they won’t survive a prolonged downturn. Every mining boom is littered with the financial wreckage of companies that either had higher costs or were late to the party in bringing on their projects. In August both BHP and Rio reported solid production lifts and production costs per tonne of iron ore of US$16 and US$15 respectively. Significant volume from these large low cost producers will have pushed down prices and will force high cost operators both domestically and in China to cut production and abandon new projects.

Key commodities to look for

At this stage in the resources cycle, investors have to be aware of the market conditions for the various commodities. It is no longer 2006, when China had an insatiable appetite for most commodities. At a mineral level we prefer oil, coking coal and iron ore to aluminium, thermal coal, gold and base metals, primarily due to the superior market structure and limited Chinese domestic supply.


Hugh Dive is a Senior Portfolio Manager at boutique investment manager Aurora Funds Management Limited, a fully owned subsidiary of ASX listed, Keybridge Capital. This article is for general education purposes and readers should seek their own professional advice before investing.



Leave a Comment:



4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Why copper prices are at all-time highs


Most viewed in recent weeks

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.


Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.


Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.