Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 432

What’s the truth about stagflation?

Stagflation occurs when growth stalls, inflation surges and unemployment stays stubbornly high. It’s unsettling when the term starts getting global attention, as it is now, but are we really facing the first resurgence of stagflation in 40 years?

If ‘stagflation’ talk is referring back to the oil shocks of the 1970s – when the US fell into recession as inflation rose sharply – we’re only there metaphorically. In other words, the US, and the global economy more broadly, currently seem far from recession.

In the 1970s the US suffered five quarters of negative real gross domestic product (GDP) growth in 1974 and 1975, and while ‘supply shocks’ are hitting us now as they did then, the comparison only goes so far.

First, while the global economy is suffering simultaneous downward pressure on activity and upward pressure on prices, economic activity in advanced economies remains well-supported, even if growth forecasts are vulnerable to the downside.

Second, to the extent the 1970s contains some lessons, it is possible that that decade reinforces the ‘transitory’ effect of supply shocks on inflation, since inflation did fall meaningfully in the US after the first oil shock in 1973-74.

Finally, while the US has a bigger ‘flation’ problem than a ‘stag’ problem, we continue to underline the risks to global activity coming from China, where ‘stag’ seems to be the dominant risk now, holding out the possibility that China is in for a deeper and longer slowdown than the market is currently braced for.

Trade growth looks particularly vulnerable

Breaks in global transport network supply chains are increasingly apparent, and power shortages in China may put downward pressure on trade growth as a result of the widespread hit to Chinese manufacturing that’s currently occurring.

Simultaneous upward pressure on prices and downward pressure on activity are especially clear now in Europe and the US.

Growth remains strong, but ‘stagflation’ headwinds to the Eurozone economy are blowing ever stronger, and in the US where job growth has proved disappointing. In the Eurozone, supply shortages which had already triggered a decoupling of production from orders are now aggravated by a huge spike in energy prices.

While energy accounts for only 3% of firms’ production cost on average across the EU, some sectors such as land and air transport or power generation will suffer significantly, and rationing could affect others.

This increases risk of business closures and insolvencies, with knock-on effects to the wider economy. Households spend 5% of the consumption basket on energy, and although we expect government intervention to cushion some of the impact of rising energy prices, we still expect 10% to 20% price increases, cutting disposable incomes by 0.5-1%.

Falling energy prices later in 2022 will then drive the reverse effect but shift growth from 2022 to 2023. Yet with GDP growth next year expected to be close to 4% both in the Eurozone and in the US, we remain far from ‘stag’ risks in economies whose potential growth is below 2%.

‘Stagflation’ in a metaphorical sense has been evident for months

As markets are forward looking, the potential for inflation and economic surprises has already been priced into market indices, reducing the risk of shock and policy intervention.

‘Stagflation’ also implies recession, and as we have noted, we see this as a remote risk on current data.

While there is no formal definition of stagflation, the term entered public consciousness in the 1970s against a background of a genuine collapse in economic activity as inflationary pressures simultaneously surged.

What makes the 1970s especially interesting as a historical parallel is that, as today, the proximate cause was a negative supply shock, in the form of a sharp increase in food prices and, especially, in energy prices following OPEC’s announcement in October 1973 that the posted price of oil would rise from US$3.01 per barrel to US$5.11.

This was followed by a decision a few days later to cut off oil shipments to the US, causing a further surge in the price. In the US at least, the inflation problem was accentuated by the end of the wage-price controls that the Nixon administration had introduced after suspending the dollar’s convertibility into gold in the summer of 1971.

The result of these actions caused chaos in the global economy, as world GDP growth fell from 6.3% in 1973 to 1.2% in 1975, and the US itself suffered five consecutive quarters of negative year-on-year GDP growth starting in Q2 1974.

What are the parallels to the 1970s?

The real price of energy has risen sharply recently, but its impact is less significant than it was 50 years ago. It is clear that while real oil prices are still quite low compared to historical pressure points, the real price of gas is indeed a concern on the face of it, reaching historically high levels.

Yet the macro impact of elevated energy prices isn’t what it used to be; diversified supply, alternative energy supplies, country fuel stockpiles and lessons learnt from previous shocks has led to the decline of energy’s impact on GDP over the past 50 years.

It would take a near-unimaginable rise in energy prices to induce a global recession, unless high energy prices shock financial markets.

To illustrate how far we are from recession, it is worth referring to an exercise based on simulations in the Oxford Economics Model. In order to get that model to predict near-zero global growth next year, a US$500 a barrel oil price is needed to shock the current baseline scenario.

In our view, while energy has the potential to create shocks the larger risk to lower growth lies with China, particularly as Chinese authorities seem determined to change the nation’s growth model and wean the economy off its dependence on real estate.

 

David Lubin is Head of Emerging Markets Economics for Citi, a sponsor of Firstlinks. Information contained in this article is general in nature and does not take into account your personal situation.

For other articles by Citi, see here.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

The coiled spring: markets are primed for the year ahead

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Taxation

Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Infrastructure

Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.