Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 131

Where to from here for house prices?

No rational valuation measure produces a number for local house prices that even remotely approximates what houses and real estate sell for in Australia. But does it follow that a bursting is the only route from here?

For decades residential housing has sold on gross yields of 2% to 5%. Inverting the yield – and remember we are talking ‘gross’ yield here, which does not count the cost of maintenance, taxes, interest payments or management fees – houses have frequently traded on multiples of 25 to 50 times the gross earnings. Let’s agree houses aren’t cheap.

What drives house prices?

In the very long run, it isn’t demographics or interest rates or immigration or construction costs or any of those things that makes investing in your home a sensible decision. What makes residential real estate investment essentially a sensible decision is that you are effectively short the Australian dollar. Not against other currencies but against itself, its purchasing power.

Housing becomes worth more over long periods of time because the purchasing power of the dollar declines due to inflation. The house that was bought decades ago is worth more in dollar terms, especially based on the land value (so the argument is not as strong for densely-built apartments).

In Australia, home ownership is hailed as a worthy aspiration. Tax structures such as zero capital gains tax on the primary place of residence and the deductibility of interest costs against residential property income as well as legislated incentives such as the first home buyers grant, have contributed to the pursuit of real estate as a worthy investment. That feeds its popularity and Australians’ predisposition to it.

Then add to the mix the accessibility of credit. With a deposit of 10% or less and low interest rates, and many properties become relatively attainable and even affordable.

What has happened to long term house prices?

If one believes that housing is a way to short the dollar, then it should be that house prices will generally follow inflation. The Herengracht Index is the longest study ever of house price changes - following house prices along the Herengracht canal in Amsterdam. Created by real estate finance professor Piet Eichholz of Maastricht University, the index goes back to the construction of the Herengracht in the 1620s and was first published from 1628 up to 1973, later extended to 2008.

The strip of homes in the index has always been some of Amsterdam’s most favoured and attractive real estate. This stability renders the index a useful tool for understanding how inflation-adjusted real estate prices change over time.

It shows that between 1628 and 2008 – 380 years – house prices rose and fell but on average the real price merely doubled. This corresponds to an average annual real price increase of about 0.1%.

In Australia long term studies have also shown prices followed inflation but only until the 1970’s when prices in Australia detached from their correlation with inflation and started to follow incomes, in particular the rising incomes of the baby boomers.

Demographics and immigration are supportive, on a net basis, for house prices in Australia. While individuals are studying longer and starting families and careers later, all cohorts from their early thirties onwards provide support to house prices.

Finally, in the shorter term, interest rates, employment, foreign investment and lender behaviour will have an impact on house prices as will changes to zoning and other government interferences.

When crowd psychology takes over

From time to time, these short-term influences combined with the mystery of crowd psychology corrupt an otherwise sound premise and an appropriate valuation.

In all bubbles the sound premise that once catalysed the favourable change in prices is forgotten and all that matters is that prices are expected to rise materially in the future as they have in the past. At some stage, if prices keep rising they become self-reinforcing. The mere fact that prices are rising confirms to the onlookers that the original premise remains sound. And those commentators who might warn of impending doom are discredited by the rising prices.

The price one pays always determines one’s return, so the higher the price, the lower the return. There is also a difference that exists between investing and speculating. Investing is where funds are committed today in the expectation that more funds will be produced later from the operations of an asset. Investing therefore doesn’t care whether the stock market or property market is open or not. A sufficient return can be made from long-term operation or development of the business or the property. Speculation, on the other hand, cares less about the asset and more about the change in price.

Combining the concepts together produces some insight into the development of a bubble from otherwise more normal changes in price. When activity switches from being investment-like to speculative the risks of a bubble forming are heightened. And when speculation is justified by apparently rational arguments - such as the weight of money argument that Chinese investment in Australian property will keep house prices supported – the risks that the seeds of an even bigger bubble will germinate start to increase.

The role of banks

Those risks are also fuelled by profit-motivated financial institutions holding the keys to the cash register amid cheap credit. In the pursuit of growth and maintaining their competitive position, lenders can fuel the already speculative flames by loosening otherwise sound lending practices.

And this happened in Australia. Earlier this year, ASIC found ‘troubling’ flaws in credit standards in the interest-only mortgage market, which represents 37% of home loans held by banks, building societies and credit unions. Interest-only loans have grown by about 80% since 2012 and we now have low and no deposit loans, which leave the borrower with little or no margin of safety if their circumstances change. A pin awaits every bubble and how toxic the aftermath becomes is directly proportional to the level of gearing that fuelled the rise.

ASIC’s review of 140 customer files held by banks and credit unions revealed that lenders incorrectly calculated how much time the borrower had to repay the principal when the interest-only period ended in 40% of cases. In about one-third of cases, ASIC found no evidence the institution had assessed the appropriateness of the product for the borrower and in more than 20% of cases, the lenders had not appropriately assessed the borrowers’ living expenses.

When house prices compared to incomes are stretched and those incomes have been estimated incorrectly, the seeds for an ugly reckoning are planted. The question is whether they will germinate and mature, resulting in a bursting.

If in the US, a decade ago, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae had been required by regulators to lend only based on 30% deposits, and to verify incomes and expenses, and to ensure loans were limited so that payments only amounted to one-third of incomes, the bubble in property prices that preceded the GFC might have been prevented.

The average house price in Sydney consumes more than 65% of the average income of a borrower geared to 80%. The reversal of the resource boom and the end of automotive manufacturing in Australia will leave holes in job prospects. We also know that throughout history prices for assets have risen spectacularly when interest rates are low.

The signs are changing

Unlike the US a decade ago, we have already seen regulatory changes to investment lending growth, lending practices and foreign investor permissions that may just be enough to prevent any bubble from inflating too fast or too far. The increase in bank capital charges for residential mortgages has already forced banks to increase their rates on investment loans, and last week, Westpac took the highly unusual step of increasing rates on owner-occupied variable rates out-of-cycle with a change in the cash rate. Other banks will follow.

Plus the banks are imposing quantitative limits on investment lending, and publishing postcode lists where they believe valuations are stretched and warrant extra deposit margins. Anyone who has tried to borrow to finance an apartment in the last few months has experienced a different attitude to a year ago. Auction clearance rates are now at their lowest level for three years.

All of this suggests some of the steam will come out of the housing market now. Of course asset prices never move in steady straight lines so a smooth transition to lower prices might not be possible. The oversupply in apartments currently under construction and the replacement of local bank lenders (who are baulking at oversupply and poorer developer standards) by Malay, Japanese and Chinese banks suggests the road could still be bumpy for investors who have overstretched.

Many investors buy and then worry about a crash. Perhaps the solution is to wait for a crash, or at least a long pause, before buying and have a lot less to worry about.


Roger Montgomery is the Founder and Chief Investment Officer at The Montgomery Fund, and author of the bestseller ‘’. This article is for general educational purposes and does not consider the specific needs of any individual.

SMSF Trustee
October 26, 2015

I'm not convinced by the arguments that the land value is what gives property its attractiveness, and particularly unconvinced about it being an inflation hedge.The main reason is the existence of land tax.
Quite simply, land tax means that unless you have bought a low value property that falls under or at least close to the land tax threshold, then it's not enough for your land value to go up with inflation. It has to go up by inflation plus the land tax rate in order to keep pace.
That can happen, of course, if you get the right property at the right starting price, but it does undermine the argument that 'buying property' is a fairly safe inflation hedge.
This is, of course, the reason governments have such a thing as land tax. The purpose of land tax is to erode the profit an investor makes from doing nothing and just enjoying property price inflation. It is there to encourage investors to do something economically valuable with the land to improve it and profit from that.
And this says nothing of capital gains tax, which chews out another chunk of any supposed 'inflation hedge'.

October 25, 2015

I welcome Roger’s insights into valuing our property market. I have yet to see residential property offered for sale based on the value of the land and the depreciated value of the structure.

Housing is sold as much a lifestyle choice as an investment. Whether it is young people paying high rents for properties close to the action of the inner city, parents wanting a sunny backyard for their kids to play in, or Chinese wanting to achieve their dream of moving from an apartment in Shanghai or Beijing to a detached house within walking distance of a train station. Maybe Cuffelinks should consider why Sydneysiders are willing to consume more than 65% of their average income to service a $900k mortgage for the privilege of living in this city, rather than forgo the relaxed lifestyle of regional areas?

Do the incentives mentioned in Roger’s article that encourage people to purchase property really make housing more affordable, or just drive up prices and building costs? I worry that the focus by the RBA and politicians’ willingness to stimulate the housing sector will result in too much debt being invested in unproductive assets (property), rather than innovative industries and small business.

Although the expansion of cities is a continuation of a long term trend, I often wonder if some disruptive technology is around the corner that will completely change people’s desire to live there.

Clive Leo
October 22, 2015

Short. Succinct; Spot on. Yes Gary M's post is right on the money. Obvious to all? Should be. (let alone lending ratios).

Gary M
October 22, 2015

Worth emphasising that the land component of 'housing' may be an inflation hedge. The structure rarely is. For those who bought flats off the plan in the boom, real and nominal prices will fall in many areas - due to small land component in the overall price - and not provide an inflation hedge.


Leave a Comment:



House prices surge but falls are common and coming

Will the house price boom be a boon for Australian banks?

Noel's share winners and loser plus budget reality check


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 little-known pension traps prove the value of advice

Most people entering retirement do not see a financial adviser, mainly due to cost. It's a major problem because there are small mistakes a retiree can make which are expensive and avoidable if a few tips were known.

Check eligibility for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card

Eligibility for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card has no asset test and a relatively high income test. It's worth checking eligibility and the benefits of qualifying to save on the cost of medications.

Hamish Douglass on why the movie hasn’t ended yet

The focus is on Magellan for its investment performance and departure of the CEO, but Douglass says the pandemic, inflation, rising rates and Middle East tensions have not played out. Vindication is always long term.

Start the year right with the 2022 Retiree Checklist

This is our annual checklist of what retirees need to be aware of in 2022. It is a long list of 25 items and not everything will apply to your situation. Run your eye over the benefits and entitlements.

At 98-years-old, Charlie Munger still delivers the one-liners

The Warren Buffett/Charlie Munger partnership is the stuff of legends, but even Charlie admits it is coming to an end ("I'm nearly dead"). He is one of the few people in investing prepared to say what he thinks.

Should I pay off the mortgage or top up my superannuation?

Depending on personal circumstances, it may be time to rethink the bias to paying down housing debt over wealth accumulation in super. Do the sums and ask these four questions to plan for your future.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Three ways index investing masks extra risk

There are thousands of different indexes, and they are not all diversified and broadly-based. Watch for concentration risk in sectors and companies, and know the underlying assets in case liquidity is needed.

Investment strategies

Will 2022 be the year for quality companies?

It is easy to feel like an investing genius over the last 10 years, with most asset classes making wonderful gains. But if there's a setback, companies like Reece, ARB, Cochlear, REA Group and CSL will recover best.


2022 outlook: buy a raincoat but don't put it on yet

In the 11th year of a bull market, near the end of the cycle, some type of correction is likely. Underneath is solid, healthy and underpinned by strong earnings growth, but there's less room for mistakes.


Time to give up on gold?

In 2021, the gold price failed to sustain its strong rise since 2018, although it recovered after early losses. But where does gold sit in a world of inflation, rising rates and a competitor like Bitcoin?

Investment strategies

Global leaders reveal surprises of 2021, challenges for 2022

In a sentence or two, global experts across many fields are asked to summarise the biggest surprise of 2021, and enduring challenges into 2022. It's a short and sweet view of the changes we are all facing.


2021 was a standout year for stockmarket listings

In 2021, sharemarket gains supported record levels of capital raisings and IPOs in Australia. The range of deals listed here shows the maturity of the local market in providing equity capital.


Let 'er rip: how high can debt-to-GDP ratios soar?

Governments and investors have been complacent about the build up of debt, but at some level, a ceiling exists. Are we near yet? Trouble is brewing, especially in the eurozone and emerging countries.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.