Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 609

Why it's time to revisit the case for non-US stocks

After more than a decade of outperformance, US stocks have come to dominate many equity portfolios, as enthusiasm for artificial intelligence propelled Magnificent 7 tech stocks higher and U.S. growth outpaced peers.

But outside the spotlight, a select group of non-US equities has quietly - but decidedly - made a case for itself. Each year for the past decade, an average of 82 of the top-100 performing stocks in the MSCI All Country World Index were headquartered outside the US, their gains driven by strong business models and secular tailwinds that mattered more than their physical address.1 For investors wary of allocating away from the US, these stocks suggest a selective approach to non-US markets could pay off, especially given gaps in valuation between US and non-US peers and an equity cycle that is showing signs it could be due for a change.

Pockets of comparable performance

The Mag 7's outperformance in the S&P 500 Index is widely recognised. Less known is that, in some cases, top contributors in non-US indices have also achieved robust gains. In fact, while the Mag 7 returned a cumulative 62% since early 2022 on an equal-weighted basis, the top seven contributors in the MSCI EAFE Index delivered 55%, benefiting in part from less volatility, such as during the broad market pullback in 2022, and lower valuations.

Diversified sources of return

Notably, the leading stocks in the MSCI EAFE were not all tech names. Rather, the group consisted of healthcare, industrials, and financials (as well as tech). This lack of sector concentration provided investors with portfolio diversification and reflected growth drivers besides Al, including rising defense spending, rapid medical innovation, and the end of zero-rate monetary policies.

A valuation advantage

Even with recent gains, many top-performing non-US stocks trade at a discount to US peers. Some valuation gap may be warranted given faster economic growth in the U.S. and the potential earnings and productivity advantages of Al. But the premium/discount appears to reflect a market that prioritises geography over fundamentals, even those that are positive. In the MSCI Europe Index, for example, roughly three-quarters of sales are now generated outside the Eurozone, similar to the S&P 500 Technology sector, which does nearly 60% of revenues in non-US markets.2

Attractive shareholder yield

This geographic handicap leaves room for upside, in our view, among high-performing non-US companies. There's also opportunity for capital payouts, with shareholder yield - a measure of dividends and buybacks - typically more generous outside the US. Even in Japan, where corporate governance standards have lagged for years, new reforms are pressuring public firms to unlock more value for investors. In 2024, share buybacks in Japan hit a record high of more than ¥18 trillion (US$121 billion), up from less than ¥10 trillion in 2023. For 2025, the sum is expected to top ¥20 trillion.3

A history of mean reversion

To be sure, non-US markets have faced challenges. In 2024, Germany, the engine of the Eurozone economy, had its second straight year of recession, while cumbersome regulations have raised costs and stifled demand across Europe. Meanwhile, Japan only recently emerged from a prolonged period of deflation and still has a ways to go with corporate reforms. (Nearly half of companies in the Tokyo Stock Price Index still trade below book value compared to less than 4% of US companies.)4

But history shows global equity returns tend to be cyclical and that outperformance can flip, often after periods of stretched valuations. Since 1980, US and non-US stocks have consistently taken turns leading markets, with the most enduring US-led periods lasting an average of more than eight years. Should markets keep up the pattern, non-US equities could soon have their comeuppance: US stocks' current run on top has lasted roughly 14 years.

Not timing the cycle

While it is impossible to pinpoint if or when a rotation might occur, an active approach to non-US stocks could still pay dividends in a diversified portfolio. Over the past decade, 65% of actively managed international funds have outperformed their respective benchmarks on an annualised basis.5 Meanwhile, structural changes that have started to take hold - from a faster pace of rate cuts and pledges to increase defense spending in Europe to market reforms in Japan - create the potential for differentiated returns (see Case example).

Avoiding recency bias

In the end, staying focused on fundamentals could also help investors avoid recency bias, or the tendency to extrapolate recent data points into perpetuity. In fact, historically, allowing recency bias to determine investment decisions would have meant overweighting international stocks in 1990, US stocks in 2000, and international stocks in 2008 - all times when the opposite would have been the better choice.

Case example: European defence

Following the Cold War, defence budgets in Europe experienced little to no growth. But amid new geopolitical tensions and a change in White House leadership, defence spending in the region looks set to accelerate.

Already, countries located near Russia have been dramatically increasing defence expenditures as a percentage of their gross domestic product (GDP). Poland, for example, committed more than 4% of its GDP in 2024, up from less than 2% a decade ago. More recently, Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, said the EU plans to activate a mechanism that allows member states to substantially increase defence expenditures without having to make cuts elsewhere. She also proposed lending up to 150 billion euros (US$158 billion) to EU governments to rearm amid worries about faltering US support for Ukraine. Some countries have already taken action. Germany's incoming government, for example, recently voted to launch a 500 billion euro ($540 billion) fund to invest in infrastructure projects and amend the constitution to exclude defence outlays from fiscal spending limits.

The shift in policy has helped to lift non-US defence stocks, but with shares having traded at discounted valuations for several years, markets may now only be starting to catch up to the potential for faster growth.

 

1 Morningstar, as of 31 December 2024.
2 FactSet, as of 31 December 2024. The S&P 500 Technology Sector comprises those companies included in the S&P 500 that are classified as members of the GICS® information technology sector.
3 Ichiyoshi Securities, The Japan Times, as of 31 December 2024. “Listed Japanese firms’ share buybacks hit record in 2024”.
4 Bloomberg, as of 28 February 2024.
5 Morningstar. Data are for 10-year annualised returns for active foreign large-blend funds versus their benchmarks from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2024.

 

Lucas Klein is Head of EMEA and Asia Pacific Equities at Janus Henderson Investors. Nothing in this article should be construed as advice. Past performance does not predict future returns. References made to individual securities do not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, investment strategy or market sector, and should not be assumed to be profitable. Janus Henderson Investors, its affiliated advisor, or its employees, may have a position in the securities mentioned.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 605 with weekend update

Trump's tariffs and China's retaliatory strike have sent the Nasdaq into a bear market with the S&P 500 not far behind. What are the implications for the economy and markets, and what should investors do now? 

  • 3 April 2025

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Designing a life, with money to spare

Are you living your life by default or by design? It strikes me that many people are doing the former and living according to others’ expectations of them, leading to poor choices including with their finances.

World's largest asset manager wants to revolutionise your portfolio

Larry Fink is one of the smartest people in the finance industry. In his latest shareholder letter, the Blackrock CEO outlines his quest to become the biggest player in private assets and upend investor portfolios.

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

How to choose a good fund manager

Despite the rise of passive investing, Australia has a number of top shelf fund managers who have consistently outperformed indices over the long-term. This looks at how to identify the best active funds for your portfolio.

Property

Key factors behind the housing supply crisis

Australia’s housing supply is falling far short of demand, driving up prices and rents. With approvals down, costs up, and planning delays rampant, the next generation may not forget - or forgive - this crisis. 

Economy

Electricity transmission is Australia's next problem

Australia’s energy transition will take decades to complete because new renewable generating capacity in the far-flung locations will require transmission capacity to be added. And we're well behind schedule on this.

Planning

Family trusts and relationship breakdowns

Trusts offer flexibility and asset protection, but in relationship breakdowns, courts can 'look through' them. Understanding control, purpose, and asset origins is key to preserving trust benefits in family law disputes.

Property

Selling your holiday home? You may be able to pay less tax

Selling your holiday home can make a lot of sense, but it can also lead to a big tax bill. Fortunately, there are strategies that investors can use to boost their retirement balance and cut their capital gains liability.

Why it's time to revisit the case for non-US stocks

History shows that global equity returns tend to be cyclical and that outperformance between regions can flip. After years of underperformance, there are growing reasons to add non-US equities to a diversified portfolio today.

Economy

Should America follow Australia with a sovereign wealth fund?

While appointing a seasoned banker to lead a US sovereign wealth fund sounds promising, the plan itself could expose the country to massive risks, market distortions, and dangerous expansions of presidential power. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.