Home / 265

Winner-takes-all is turning conventional wisdom on its head

Video transcript

The Wilshire 5000 Index was introduced in the mid-70s, and at that time, shouldn't be too terribly shocking, there were about 5,000 publicly traded companies in the United States. Over the course of the next 20 years, that number rose to about 7,500. Interestingly, over the last 20 years, that number has declined and it's now at about 3,500. There are a lot fewer publicly traded companies in the United States.

In fact, these large companies are taking a larger and larger part of the playing field for each particular sector. This is a little bit strange. It's not happening that much in other countries. We basically have a publicly traded company deficit in the United States. The bottom line is, there are fewer and fewer companies that are taking the playing field, and therefore, these companies tend to be larger companies. They're older companies. They're companies that we know. It becomes more and more difficult for small and new companies to enter the playing field.

Historically, those small and new companies tend to be the ones that are innovative. They're the ones that push the envelope. They're the ones that force the incumbents to have to be more innovative, more creative, more competitive. When we take those smaller and newer companies off the field, it should be a bad thing for the economy. It should mean less innovation. It should mean less job growth. We should be a little bit worried about that.

The other thing that's really interesting about this dynamic is the textbooks would tell us, as there are fewer and fewer companies in any given sector, and you get sort of an oligopolistic outcome, few companies that control their space, prices should go higher and consumer welfare should fall. But what we're actually seeing, and especially in some of the digital spaces, is that these companies are competing on price. So, prices are actually falling and consumers are better off because prices are lower.

So, why should we care? Why is this a problem? Well, it could be a problem, again, because we're not seeing the kind of competition that we would want to see. We're not getting the innovation. We're not seeing the new job growth from smaller companies, but let's abstract from that for a minute and ask, what does it mean in terms of markets? What does it mean in terms of finance?

Well, about 25 years ago there was a really important paper that came out from Fama and French that told us that you could extract rents over the course of a business cycle by buying value companies over growth companies and buying small cap companies over large cap companies. That's worked out pretty well over the course of the last 25 years through the business cycle.

In a world, though, where winner takes all, it's the incumbent companies that tend to do better. We might want to reinspect this notion that you can extract rents from value companies and small companies over the course of long periods of time. In a world where winners take all, it might be the case that these growth companies and these large companies, the ones that we know so well, are the winners and you might want to place your bets there rather than what the conventional wisdom would tell us.

 

Erik Weisman is Chief Economist and Portfolio Manager at MFS, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. The views expressed are those of the speaker and are subject to change at any time. These views are for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as a recommendation to purchase any security or as a solicitation or investment advice from the Advisor.

For more articles and papers from MFS Investment Management, please click here.

RELATED ARTICLES

Is there an Uber or Amazon of wealth management?

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirees facing steep increases for basic items

ASFA has updated its tables on how much money is needed for a 'comfortable' or 'modest' lifestyle in retirement, but there are some prices rising well ahead of inflation.

Adele Ferguson on ‘Banking Bad’ and weaving magic

The journalist most responsible for the calling of the Royal Commission takes care not to be roped in by everyone with a complaint to push. It takes experienced judgement to gather the right information.

Let’s stop calling them ‘bond proxies’

With cash and term deposit rates at all-time lows, and fixed interest bonds not much better, investors are looking for ‘bond proxies’ to deliver more income. But is ‘proxy’ a misnomer, and what are they anyway?

Six warning bells against property spruikers

Property spruikers use common techniques, and con men will increasingly target older people who feel they do not have enough financial independence for their retirement years.

Should retirees spend more and worry less?

When more than half of retired Australians restrict their spending to less than the age pension and fear running out of money more than death itself, they may be denying a better lifestyle for themselves.

Helping your children build their super

It has become more difficult to build large superannuation balances with contribution caps and more people paying off home loans for longer. How can wealthy parents help their adult children?

Fidelity

banner

Sponsors

Alliances

Special eBooks

Specially-selected collections of the best articles 

Read more

Earn CPD Hours

Accredited CPD hours reading Firstlinks

Read more

Pandora Archive

Firstlinks articles are collected in Pandora, Australia's national archive.

Read more