Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 293

How is 2019 different from 2018?

The central bank policy of 'quantitative easiness' has morphed into simply ‘queasiness’. Certainly, that’s an apt feeling among investors following sharp falls in risk asset prices in the last quarter of 2018, again bringing into focus the question of asset allocation for the path ahead. While many of the surprise falls reversed, at least in part, through January 2019, it’s important to consider what may have driven the sharp declines. Are they symptomatic of a more prolonged malaise or a temporary setback?

It’s hard to ignore the secular shift in the comparable risk/reward metrics of major asset groups. Sharemarkets rewarded investors almost without missing a heartbeat in the entire post-GFC environment, buoyed by central bank monetary stimulus. The combination of a stable tiller and cheap money was an intoxicating mix. But now, perhaps if the initial US experience is anything to go by, we’re seeing for the first time in a long while the impact of having ‘the training wheels off’ and of borrowing costs moving back to a more normalised level, on a jittery equity market.

Fixed interest became relatively more interesting

What we are faced with today is a shifting set of relative market dynamics combined with a much less certain political landscape, with neither being especially ‘equity friendly’.

One thing that is arguably different now as we contemplate future asset allocations is the risk premia or simply the forecast return spread between cash and bonds, and equities. The ~1% cash rate return of the past decade was utopia for equities. Dividend yields of 4% or 5% made them the darling of any asset allocators tool kit. But now that cash rates in the US exceed 2%, the equity dividend yield return spread is less attractive.

And that’s before we factor in the tailwind that a rising rate environment ultimately brings to sovereign and credit yields. There may be some pain as rates rise if duration exposure is left unhedged, but the forward-looking returns from those bond assets today look more appealing. US 10-year Treasuries continue to oscillate around the 3% mark, and investment grade credit yields sit comfortably above 4% at the medium-to-long end of the curve.

The chart below illustrates the forward-looking benefit that the combination of sporadically widening spreads and rising rates - which characterized much of 2018 - provides to bond investors. They give higher yields across the maturity curve with no discernible elevation in the level of default risk. Suddenly, an equity dividend yield of even 5% doesn’t feel quite as rich, and certainly not on a risk- or volatility-adjusted basis.

Investment grade corporate bond yield curve

Source: Bloomberg as of 31/12/2018 using Bloomberg’s BVAL USD US Corporate Investment Grade Yield Curve. The yield curve is constructed using USD senior, unsecured fixed rate bonds issued by US investment grade companies. 

All this in a climate of political instability brought about by populism and anti-globalism and protectionism with the power to materially disrupt global trade and harmony, and an increasingly embattled Donald Trump.

In 2018, defensive asset allocations won

After all the noise of 2018, those carrying the most defensive strategic asset allocations emerged victorious. It was a worthy reminder that through cycles there will always be periods where it pays to bias your objectives towards preserving money just as much as growing it. Regardless of whether risk asset volatility of the past couple of months proves to be temporary or more sustained, higher cash and bond yields signal a harder environment for equities to maintain the strong competitive edge that they have enjoyed over the past decade.

Chart 2: Short-term Treasuries top returns

However, our responsibility as investors to those that entrust their money to us means that we cannot sit idly by. This environment has developed as one where optimal balancing between prudent defense and sensible return-seeking becomes paramount.

To borrow from Nat King Cole, while there may be trouble ahead, we must face the music and dance. But perhaps from a safer point on the dance floor not too far from the exit should a hasty retreat become necessary.


James Bloom is Managing Director, Investor Relations at Kapstream Capital, an affiliate of Fidante Partners. This article is for general information, not financial advice. It has been prepared without taking into account any person's objectives.

Fidante is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers from Fidante, please click here.


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reason to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies will benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated investors' can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.