Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 274

Active or passive ETFs: how do you decide?

Working for an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) manager, investors might presume that I’ll always favour a simple passive index-tracking ETF. Whilst I may think that indexing is the way to go most of the time because of the instant diversification, lower costs, and the historical inability of the majority of active managers to outperform their benchmarks, active strategies have their role in portfolios.

However, as an investor, how do you decide which approach to use?

The evolution of ETFs

Exchange traded products have gone through an evolution over the years like products in other industries:

  1. At first there were passive index-tracking ETFs which seek to mirror the performance of a specific investment index, and which often utilise a simple market-cap weighted methodology or aim to track a specific commodity or currency, or group of commodities and currencies.

  1. Then came smart beta or rules-based exchange traded products, typically using a systematic investment approach. Some of these approaches can still be index tracking. However, such indices typically go beyond market-cap weighted methodologies and may consider factors like size, value and volatility as an alternative weighting methodology. Other products may not track an index but still use a prescriptive set of rules as part of their investment objectives (for example, yield-oriented buy-write strategies or funds that aim to provide short exposure to share markets).

  1. More recently, active ETFs have portfolio managers making decisions on the underlying portfolio composition and do not try to mirror the performance of any underlying index. Instead, typically the manager’s main goal is to outperform a benchmark index by actively trading or changing sector allocations.

What should an investor take into consideration when deciding whether to select active or passive investment strategies? Here are three considerations:

1. How efficient is the underlying market?

There are segments of the market that are inefficient, giving an opportunity to exploit mis-pricing and potentially deliver outperformance, or ‘alpha’. Active management or smart beta, rules-based strategies may do better. Two examples are hybrids and small cap markets.

In hybrids, an active manager can potentially add value over an index-tracking approach by accessing deeper liquidity and improved trading costs, with specialist knowledge to assess the complex and varied issuance terms of securities, and the ability to sell securities when they become overvalued.

In small caps, we believe that most of the outperformance in the sector can be achieved over market cycles, by identifying and avoiding companies with undesirable investment characteristics. This can be achieved with some sensible screens, delivered in a cost-effective way via an exchange traded product.

2. Where are we in the market cycle?

When a momentum-driven market is generally moving higher, there may be no need to look at active or smart beta strategies. “A rising tide lifts all boats” is the saying, and just having exposure to the right sector may be all that is needed.

However, as a market peaks and corrects, market pull backs and risks may be mitigated by using a strategy that is active or rules-based, which will hopefully have exposure to higher quality securities that will be less affected by the fall.

High volatility or trendless markets present another opportunity for active and smart beta strategies to take advantage of specific securities or sectors. Or alternative strategies that are defensive, or not as correlated to rest of the market, can also shine.

Yield strategies have always been popular with Australian investors. A few years ago, most yield stocks performed well. The market environment is different today. Banks may struggle to grow their earnings and therefore their share prices in the years ahead. There is some prospect that interest rates could rise again, which would impact interest rate sensitive investments, and many market observers feel the top 20 stocks on the ASX will have a more difficult time.

For funds with a specific income objective, active management can add value above a passive strategy by navigating the markets in changed market conditions. Specific strategies aim to deliver an attractive, tax-effective and low volatility income stream that can increase with inflation, targeted at retirees and low-tax paying investors.

3. Is the added cost for active or rules-based strategies worth the money?

Shopping for any product is about value. A top quality shirt may cost more but with longer wear, it might cost less in the long run. The same goes for investing. Will there be enough outperformance in the long term to justify the added cost? Management fees eat into returns and, although an active manager may outperform their benchmark, after considering their fees may underperform.

The cheapest Aussie equities exposure in the world is currently the BetaShares Australia 200 ETF (ASX:A200), with a management fee of 0.07% per annum. However, this is a market cap-weighted index and potential outperformance may come from a smart beta approach such as Fundamental Indexing. It is also available via an ETF and has outperformed the market cap-weighted index over the long term by about 2% per annum*, but with higher fees.

In summary, active, rules-based and passive strategies can be used in conjunction with one another and should be considered as part of a diversified portfolio.

 

*Source: Bloomberg. FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index v S&P/ASX 200 Index, 1992 to June 2018. Does not take into account ETF fees and expenses. You can’t invest directly in an index. Past performance is not indicative of future returns.

 

Justin Arzadon is a senior member of the Distribution team at BetaShares, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This material has been prepared as general information only, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should seek your own financial advice before making any investment decision.

For more articles and papers from BetaShares, please click here.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Global ETFs: insights into a multi-trillion-dollar industry

Australian ETFs: end of year reviews 2018

Fight cybercrime by investing in cybersecurity

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.