Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 640

AFIC on the speculative ASX boom, opportunities, and LIC discounts

It’s been widely noted how profitless companies in the US have trounced the S&P 500 this year. Less spoken of is that a similar thing has happened here, according to Mark Freeman, CEO of Australian Foundation Investment Company (AFIC).

Gold and smaller miners have soared while many blue-chip stocks have been left behind. For fund managers like AFIC which favour quality companies, it’s been a tough ride.

Freeman cites Goodman Group (ASX: GMG), REA (ASX: REA), and Car Group (ASX: CAR) as examples - all fantastic businesses, though their share prices are down 17%, 15%, and 4% respectively in 2025, compared to the 5% gain in the ASX 200 index.


Source: Morningstar


Source: Morningstar


Source: Morningstar

Even after more than 30 years working in markets, Freeman has been taken aback by some of the volatility in share prices. The market has walloped any company with even a hint of disappointing news.

A cynic might suggest that his remarks are cover for AFIC’s underperformance versus the index this year. Freeman acknowledges that recent performance has been “confronting” for shareholders.

However, he is very comfortable – “relaxed”, in his words – about where the current AFIC portfolio is positioned.

Your author checked AFIC’s portfolio before the interview and had a similar reaction to Freeman’s. It’s a portfolio I’d be comfortable holding - full of quality, growing companies with generally sound balance sheets and management teams.


Source: AFIC

There are a few things that stand out with the portfolio. First, AFIC remains significantly underweight the Big 4 banks versus the index. It’s overweight NAB (ASX: NAB), but substantially underweight CBA (ASX: CBA) and ANZ (ASX: ANZ).

Second, it’s also underweight materials. The main holdings in resources are BHP (ASX: BHP) and RIO (ASX: RIO).

Third, there are major overweights in industrials, consumer discretionary, and healthcare. These are the main areas where AFIC is plying its trade.

Portfolio problem children

A few AFIC stocks have been in the news for the wrong reasons. CSL (ASX: CSL) is a big one given it’s AFIC’s fifth largest holding.

Freeman says the brutal plunge in the share price is partly down to a downgrade in earnings expectations. CSL had been guiding double-digit earnings growth but the latest profit growth has come in at 5-6%. The other factor behind the decline in the share price is valuation multiple compression. Previously, the market had been exuberant and priced CSL at close to 40x earnings. That’s dipped to 16x – a massive derating.

Freeman thinks the market reaction looks overdone if the company can deliver on guidance of high single-digit EPS growth. Conversely, if profit growth remains at current levels of 5-6%, then today’s share price may be close to fair value.

While the company has had its issues, Freeman believes if it can execute well and deliver high-single-digit earnings growth, then combined with a potential valuation rerating, it can reward shareholders going forward.


Source: Morningstar

James Hardie (ASX: JHX) has been the other problem child. The company was 2.3% of AFIC’s portfolio at the start of the year, and it’s now down to 1.2%. Much of the reduced holding can be explained by the sharp drop in the share price, though some of it is likely AFIC trimming its exposure too.

Freeman says the company’s acquisition of US-based outdoor living building products maker, AZEK, made some sense. However, James Hardie made two mistakes. First, it overpaid. Second, it used debt instead of shares to finance the purchase.

He thinks James Hardie is still a quality business, but it’s down to how you assess management and whether the current price factors in all the bad news. And on these things, Freeman was coyer.


Source: Morningstar

Major bank outlook

On the Big Four banks, Freeman likes the businesses, though he’s not enamoured with their growth prospects. He doesn’t see much earnings growth moving forward. And that means that if you get a 6% grossed-up dividend yield in a bank, that will be your annual return if earnings don’t move and P/Es don’t decline. If the bank with that 6% grossed-up yield has no profit growth and a 10% derating in its P/E ratio, then your return will be -4% over the next 12 months. Freeman sees P/E deratings as a big risk, especially in the likes of CBA.

AFIC has been underweight the banks over the past few years, and though that proved painful initially, it’s looking better now.

If money continues to move out of banks into other sectors, where will it go? Freeman isn’t sure that it will automatically rotate into the other large ASX sector, resources. He’s hoping it will also find its way into quality industrials, where AFIC has many of its holdings.

ASX 200 prospects

On the outlook for the Australian market in 2026, it was refreshing to hear Freeman’s reply: “I’ve got 100% confidence that I’ve got no idea.”

He says the market is expensive and at current multiples, future returns are likely to be lower. It could go sideways or return 4% per annum over the next 3-4 years, compared to its historical long-term return of 9% a year.

AFIC’s NTA discount

The large net tangible asset (NTA) discounts with many listed investment companies (LICs) has been a big investor discussion point over the past year. AFIC’s NTA discount remains at 9.3%, down from double digits for much of 2025.

While the discount isn’t ideal, Freeman isn’t too concerned. While many point to the rise of ETFs as a driver for the discount, he’s not buying that. He forwarded me this chart, which shows that previous market peaks have coincided with large NTA discounts for AFIC.

In 1999-2000, AFIC traded at an NTA discount of more than 15%. Then, after the tech crash, it traded at an NTA premium of up to 15%. The same sort of thing happened pre-and-post GFC.

Fast forward to Covid, and investors rushed into AFIC for its income during a turbulent period. That’s since reversed as markets have rebounded and soared to new highs.

Freeman’s point is that what’s happening now with NTA discounts isn’t new and it should turn at some point.

Meantime, his company is continuing to buy back AFIC shares. The buyback program is primarily to stabilise company share issuance – its dividend reinvestment program increases the number of shares, which is then decreased through buybacks.

Freeman says buybacks will also be used opportunistically when the stock is cheap.

AFIC’s prospects

Freeman pointed out that AFIC has built up a substantial pool of franking credits in recent years. Consequently, they paid a 5 cent special dividend this year, and they’ve just announced that there’ll pay another 5 cent special dividend in FY26, split 50:50 between interim results in January and full year results in July.

In sum, Freeman says he’s comfortable with prospects for AFIC’s portfolio, investors will get special dividends on top of the normal dividends over the next seven months, and the NTA discount may shrink if history is any guide.

Personally, I think Freeman makes a compelling argument and a turnaround in AFIC’s fortunes may not be far away.

 

James Gruber is Editor of Firstlinks.

Mark Freeman is Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director at Australian Foundation Investment Company (AFIC). He is also Managing Director of Djerriwarrh Investments Limited, AMCIL Limited and Mirrabooka Investments Limited.

 

  •   3 December 2025
  • 8
  •      
  •   
8 Comments
David
December 04, 2025

That’s all very interesting.

Thing is, AFI execs have been, and are, underperforming - but still get paid good coin.

In their current landscape I am not relaxed reading about them being ‘relaxed’ (while seemingly decelerating the corporate trundle).

No wonder ETF world is so attractive.

On an allied matter, they have been looking hard at offering an international share fund for almost 5 years - really?!
oh - Yes, Minister (?).

4
David Stogdale
December 04, 2025

AFI has maintained a generous DRP program for years. The jumbo dividends this year and also foreshadowed for 2026 only increase more DRP shares being issued - at a 10% (or so) discount to NTA. The dilution to EPS and EPS growth potential is obvious. The DRP should be axed. The buy-back needs to continue, providing they have the cash on hand, which seems to be running out. The current buy-back is nowhere near the amount of stock issued via the DRP. EPS growth drives a share price of this type of company. AFI has stalled and shows no EPS growth because it issues DRP stock constantly and increases dividends, making the position even worse. DPS should be limited to well under 100% of EPS. Whereas, dividends today exceed EPS. Consequently, stock price performance is poor. The Directors and CEO of AFI need to be reminded that AFI is a business and changes - perhaps unpalatable ones, need to occur. AFI looks increasingly like Telstra of old, - where you were holding the stock, and replacing capital value to some degree (as the price fell) with income via artificially inflated dividends. Just as well the NTA of AFI is still higher than the stock price. There is a reasonable chance that the discount to NTA will remain for some time until the management group understands that their current policies are not working and adopt policies that actively demonstrate that they are really working hard to close the discount. This is not evident today as the interview shows.

4
James#
December 04, 2025

"It’s a portfolio I’d be comfortable holding - full of quality, growing companies with generally sound balance sheets and management teams."

I think you're being "kind" here James. Their performance has been very underwhelming over the last 5 years especially and even over the last decade......and they know it! Little to convince me that they'll measurably do anything markedly different, just more or less, the same wash, rinse, repeat!


Over last 5 years: VAS + 26%, AFI - 1.11%
Over the last 10 years: VAS + 57.15%, AFI + 19.66% (Share price increase/decrease total)

Investors would have been better off in a simple ASX200 or 300 ETF!

2
Mike west
December 04, 2025

For some reason they have been overweight NAB for 30 years , clearly bad analysis / research as they have been on the wrong horse !! But still on it , I guess one day it may come good .

1
Harry Jabroni
December 04, 2025

It does seem hard to justify the executive and portfolio management piece in the age of cheap indexing and chronic underperformance.

I wonder if the only real advantage they have is tax management by way of Bonus Share Plans and the absence of surprise CGT bills that ETFs fall victim to with rebalancing.

NAV regression to the mean may be an opportunity, but not really if the portfolio value falls to meet the share price.

1
Guy
December 04, 2025

AFIC isn’t trying to maximise EPS or beat the index.
It exists to protect retirees from ever needing to sell shares to pay bills.
The DRP and high payouts are deliberate tools that build capital slowly while keeping dividends reliable.

Lester Gabriel
December 04, 2025

Held since the nearly 40 years, progressively increased the holding until 2003. Sold off just over 60% in the period 2018-2022 taking advantage of spikes, when at a premium to NTA. I note that the highest price was $8.85 in early 2022. Whilst there has been underperformance from AFI, their MER at 0.16% is low ...
Whilst we also have some ETF exposure (with mixed results, both positive and negative), the reality that AFI and others do not have to portfolio re-balance (and they can manage their franking accounts to smooth out distributions), is actually something I would have thought Mr Market would have placed a premium on that flexibility.
At the end end of the day, it's a low risk exposure paying fully franked dividends, that requires minimal attention - and tends to be a bit of a shock absorber when other parts of the portfolio soar, or tank.
Oh well, let us see what happens when the market has it's next substantial correction, as it inevitably will.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

ASX large cap outlook for 2025

Winners and losers in sharemarkets, 2017/18

Why August company reporting season was poor

banner

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.