Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 368

After 30 years of investing, I prefer to skip this party

Much of the stock market’s buoyancy is attributable to just six tech companies – Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Netflix and Google. They have a market capitalisation of more than US$6.5 trillion or fully one quarter of the entire S&P500 index, as shown below. Their market share was only about 10% five years ago.

Graham Hand recently mentioned in his article Six ratios show the market is off the charts that the Nasdaq (the tech index) is again on a Price/Earnings (P/E) of 30 times. It was last here 16 years ago in 2004. By itself a high P/E ratio means little but it reminds us that P/Es can also decline. In 2002, the Nasdaq’s P/E was below 10 and in 2008, 2011 and 2012 the Nasdaq100’s P/E touched 13 times.

Even great companies can become too expensive

Over the past five years, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and Google have collectively increased their profits by US$80 billion but their market capitalisation has increased by US$4.4 trillion. That represents an expansion of the P/E multiple of 55 times!

Admittedly these businesses are scarce assets, they have long runways for growth, they are monopolists with pricing power. They are the very businesses long-term value investors like Warren Buffett salivate over. But poor investments can be made in even the highest quality businesses when the price paid is too high. It is a simple reality of investing that the higher the price you pay, the lower your return.

Another reality is that extreme multiples for scarce assets is a common event during periods of low interest rates, and particularly when rates are lower than trend economic growth rates. But extreme multiples are not usually sustained in history.

Low interest rates (whether they are artificial or not) have a disproportional effect on the present values of earnings further out. The present value of $100 earned in a year’s time rises by 4.76% when interest rates halve from 10% to 5%. But the present value of $100 earned in 15 years rises by 100% when interest rates halve from 10% to 5%.

Therefore, the biggest jump in intrinsic values occurs for those companies with the bulk of their value in the terminal part of the calculation. Start-ups and emerging companies with little profit today but expected to earn much out over the horizon see their theoretical value rise the most when interest rates are cut.

But again, low interest rates do not immunise a company’s shares from shocks and falls. Ultimately the growth in expected earnings must be delivered and for the price to continue rising from already-stretched levels, the P/E must expand. That means the company must exceed the already optimistic expectations. And life simply doesn’t work out that way. There are always potholes on the road to success.

Consider that earnings for US technology companies as represented by the Nasdaq have declined 27% since February 2020 and are now back to 2017 levels, but the index is 60% higher than it was in 2017.

The technology theme is a good one, but …

The thesis for buying the technology theme makes sense. Microsoft, for example, will benefit from an increased number of people working from home; Netflix has more subscribers watching from home; Amazon has more online shoppers. The pandemic will be around for much longer than current mainstream commentary seems to suggest.

But of course, all booms start with a legitimate and credible thesis. As that thesis gains acceptance, it also gains momentum, and many less sophisticated investors jump aboard. Eventually investors pile in, not on the basis of the original thesis, but simply because the shares keep going up. Eventually, prices become so extreme they bear no relationship to reality and a bubble forms.

I believe we are there today, not for all stocks but for many in the technology space.

While there is merit in the idea that COVID-19 lockdowns have accelerated the trend to digitisation of work, entertainment and logistics, there is little doubt the rally in technology stocks has also been extended by a veritable tidal wave of debutante investor buying, the poster boy for which is Barstool Sports founder David Portnoy. In June, this self-promoter called Warren Buffett an “idiot” and said day-trading is “literally the easiest game I’ve ever played” adding “all I do is print money”. Frame it!

According to Gavekal Data, if one removes the US market from the MSCI World Index, the rest of the world has gone nowhere, in aggregate, for six years. It is a testament to the failed experiment QE has been in attempting to inspire real economic growth.

The strength in US markets is despite S&P500 earnings forecast to fall 20% year-on-year over the next four quarters, according to analysts surveyed by Refinitiv. This represents a significant turnaround from the 10% growth forecast before COVID-19 hit.

My updated opinion on Afterpay

There is no better insight into the real and present madness of crowds than the Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) leader Afterpay. Its share price is up almost eightfold since March, thanks in part to COVID-19 accelerating online and cashless retail sales. Government employment support programmes both here and in the US ensured millennials were able to meet their repayment obligations to the company. Share price support was also aided by the appearance of the Chinese company Tencent on the register.

Afterpay now has a market capitalisation of $19 billion, although the company generates just $230 million of revenue and a bottom-line loss. At the time of writing, Afterpay is the 18th largest listed company in Australia, bigger than Cochlear, Sydney Airport, Aristocrat, Brambles or shopping centre owner Scentre Group (formerly Westfield). It’s bigger than Bluescope, Qantas and Lendlease combined.

Its two founders recently sold $270 million worth of shares in their second sell down in 12 months, which is more than the annual revenue the company generated.

Afterpay is simply a factoring company. It buys a retailer’s receivables or debtors for a fee and then collects the amount owing directly from the debtor. Factoring businesses have always made thin margins which partly explains why this company will have to keep raising money and diluting shareholders to fund its expanding book.

In 2021, I will mark my 30th year in financial markets and I have seen many booms and busts in that time, not only in stocks but in currencies and commodities too. Stepping back from all the noise, there are a few occasions in one’s life where value simply slaps you in the face.

Oil trading at negative US$37 earlier this year or the US dollar at US$1.08 in 2011 are two relatively recent examples I took advantage of.

There are an equal number of occasions where value is so distant from the minds of the investor that the only safe course of action is to zip up one’s wallet. Technology stocks today appear to be one of those occasions.

Trading on revenue multiples, not profit

Putting sentimentality aside, paying 51 times revenue for Shopify, 37 times revenue for Zoom or 20 times revenue for Twilio will produce a low return over the next few years for investors. That low return however is accompanied by the risk of a sharp loss of capital. On a risk-adjusted basis, it makes more sense to secure a low return from cash at present.

Consequently, we are content to hold a higher allocation of cash in our funds. We might miss more of the party but it is a party we’d rather let David Portnoy and his friends enjoy. I wouldn’t be seen dead at it.

No fund manager or analyst can see the shape of employment and therefore true consumption because government largesse in the form of wage subsidies has replaced wages of those furloughed. Spending patterns must and will therefore change. Predicting those changes while government handouts remain in place is next to impossible.

Having some cash in this environment makes sense and so does reducing the ‘beta’ or risk of the portfolio.

Investors would be wise at this juncture to consider whether expectations of an imminent end to the pandemic are premature. If a vaccine is not developed, and first and second COVID-19 waves send cities and countries back into lockdown, keeping borders closed, then the unbridled enthusiasm currently gripping markets is equally misplaced and premature. This may be one time the Fed's liquidity cannot do 'whatever it takes'.


Roger Montgomery is Chairman and Chief Investment Officer at Montgomery Investment Management. This article is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.


dan c
January 25, 2021

and afterpay stock has doubled in the six months since this was published

Phillip Woodhill
February 07, 2021

Roger, I like your work and also some old sayings to keep the market in perspective.
e.g A rising tide lifts all boats, A newbie is born every day, Everything that glitters is not gold, High values with low interest, Time heals all wounds. I think we have experienced all of these at some time so we should know better how to perceive the market tricks.
At times like this i think I maybe a robot after-all. Cheers

Mr T
August 15, 2020

Onetel is a good example. Praised as a high growth stock and a 'disruptor' some 20 years ago. But then collapsed worthless.

August 08, 2020

Very relevant article Roger - check out Howard Marks' interview with Tim Ferriss in which he reminisces about his early career experience with the NIFTY 50:

August 01, 2020

looking forward to scramble for the door when it happens.

August 01, 2020

I don't understand the attraction of Afterpay over a credit card. With both Afterpay and Visa/Mastercard you buy goods from a retailer. The seller gets the funds immediately less a small fee. The buyer pays their Afterpay debt over four payments or their Visa/Mastercard debt in one or more payments. I would like to know, which should have been covered in this article, is what market share the growing popularity of Afterpay is taking from established credit card companies. It is a new disruptive business model and growing market share here and overseas would indicate sustainability. For some reason Afterpay is loved by trend following Millennials, if not by us rational Boomers.

August 27, 2020

Why not both, I use my credit card to pay for things on Afterpay, it effectively means that I can split a purchase over two months worth of interest free periods on the credit card. Yes it's only a small win, but a saving is a saving - something us Millennials are often criticized for. Also, people are attracted to Afterpay because you don't have to pay interest per se, with credit cards it can feel like a baseball bat of compound interest is coming your way if you don't make your payments.

July 31, 2020

article sums up my sentiments exactly

July 31, 2020

Very conservative as always Roger, and a problem sitting on a lot of cash.

July 30, 2020

Great article. I use your method defined in Value.Able to determine "Intrinsic Value" before I invest in a company and at present I don't see much value in the Tech stocks.

July 30, 2020

and value investing has performed really well over the past 10 years ?

August 01, 2020

Don't extrapolate into the future what has happened in the immediate past. Every dog has its day.

July 30, 2020

Lots of research, lots of articles over many years but need to deliver performance.

Been there B4
July 30, 2020

Spot on, Roger. I started investing 55 years ago

Warren Bird
July 29, 2020

Agree, Roger. And I've been around even longer than you!

About half way through my 40 year career I gave a presentation to clients with the title: how much would you pay for a zero coupon perpetual bond?

It is of course a trick question. The answer is zero - no money ever coming back to you is not something that has any value. But, I argued, many dot com companies were just that , or worse. No earnings and, being shares, there was no maturity date or promised value at termination. They were zero coupon perpetuals.

You make a valid point that start ups have expected positive cash flows years down the track and that these increase in value at lower discount rates. But they shouldn't be valued at lower discount rates, whatever the risk free government bond rate is doing. There is heightened risk that those earnings will ever come through.

In the end a high P/E means a longer duration for an asset, and thus a higher price sensitivity to changes in the discount rate or earnings growth assumption. Hence, when the punchbowl is removed, they crash big time. The thing is that companies with no earnings have an infinite duration risk. That's scary stuff for a genuine investor, rather than someone relying on the next mug to come along and buy them out of their position.

Some companies will make it - eg Microsoft and Google. Many won't.

Nice article. Thanks.

July 30, 2020

Sour grapes from failing to see Afterpay's potential. 

Warren Bird
July 30, 2020

Not at all. The equity funds that I personally invest in and that we use professionally have done very nicely out of AfterPay. I did say, some companies will make it. Whether AfterPay hangs around for the long haul is yet to be seen, but all the companies I used as examples in my client presentations 20 years ago are no longer with us despite trading at huge P/E's for a while.
I''m a much more experienced investor than your silly quip gives me credit for.

August 04, 2020

We'll see, winner (sic); the same could have been said recently of Hertz or Kodak. Don't confuse "speculation that met luck" with genius. The company makes no profits and market sentiment can turn very quickly - faster than you can get out of a position.

And if you made your money early, then well done, but don't expect it will always be that way.

July 30, 2020

I would like to know these 20 companies that no longer exist that were once very valuable?. Assuming new companies have learned from those mistakes and maybe the past will not repeat itself.. I would also like to see what I could learn from these failed companies

Stephen E
July 31, 2020

Adelaide Steamship / Adsteam, Bond Corporation are long dead.
Elders (in various company names) and Telstra still exist but at a fraction of their peaks.
Experience is probably the most important 'skill' in the stockmarket.
If you think new companies learned from those mistakes, you are seriously kidding yourself!


Leave a Comment:



The value of ‘value’ and Benjamin Graham’s three core beliefs

Why it's a frothy market but not a bubble

FANMAG: Because FAANGs are so yesterday


Most viewed in recent weeks

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.


Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.


Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.