Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Are income funds just arbitrage funds?

Question from Rob: My own personal pet peeve is ‘Dividend Income Funds’. The name would imply that such funds are invested so as to maximse DIVIDEND income, be it franked or not. Yet, the number of so called ‘Dividend Income Funds’ whose investment strategy is to access income-like outcome through the usage of derivative arb strategies confound. Whilst I accept such strategies may yield (pardon the pun) income- like results, they are not Dividend, they are not tax effective, nor as they paid out as received CASH. If we're fair dinkum, then why not call them what they truly are,’Synthetic Arbitrage Funds’?:

Response from Rudi Minbatiwala, Senior Portfolio Manager with Colonial First State Global Asset Management and co-manager of the Colonial First State Equity Income Fund.

Rob, thanks for the question. As a Fund Manager in the ‘equity income’ space, we agree that investors need to take a closer look at strategies than just a fund name and think deeper about the concept of generating an income stream from equities. The confusion around the labelling of this space is understandable and reflects the challenges faced by researchers/consultants, dealer groups, advisers and by the wider industry in understanding the nuances of this heterogeneous space. While these funds are linked by the common objectives they seek to achieve, they can differ greatly by the approach they undertake, and the industry is rife with misunderstandings and over-simplifications with regards to a wide range of issues.

The common strategy of simultaneously buying shares and selling call options on those shares (called a buy-write strategy) changes the return path and return composition of the investment. We actually agree that too often this derivative strategy is positioned with an over-emphasis on the income aspect of the strategy. Selling call options over some of the shares you own is another way to reflect your investment view on that share. It is an investment tool; it is not an ‘arbitrage’ concept.

A buy-write strategy should be considered in terms of an ‘asset-liability’ concept. The option premium income received is an ‘asset’ that is obtained when the call option is sold. The size of this ‘asset’ is fixed and known at the time of implementation. This makes targeting a desired level of income (cashflow) relatively straightforward. However, the option premium income that is generated is not ‘free’; the capped share price upside represents an unknown ‘liability’ that changes in value with the passage of time and market movements.

Like all liabilities, this call option liability needs to be properly managed and the key drivers of the liability need to be understood. The relevant risk factors impacting the value of the call option liability on a share are the same stock specific risks and market risks impacting the underlying share prices.

Understanding the distinction between generating an additional distributable income stream and managing investment returns is critical. In the same way you always consider what shares you buy, and what price you pay for those shares, you must apply the same basic investment principles to the selling of options. For your highest conviction shares in your portfolio, you are likely to only cover some (or none) of your shares with options, and seek more upside exposure for the call options you implement. For other shares, you will prefer to cover more of your holdings and position the options closer to the current share price. This will generate additional income for your portfolio and provide a greater downside cushion. Simply selling options over all of your shares, all of the time, is likely to lead to a sub-optimal outcome.

Therefore, a focus on just the income generation from using derivatives is an over-simplification that needs to be avoided by outcomes focussed investors. Certainly not all equity income products that utilise derivatives are the same. The challenge for the industry remains in developing a greater understanding of what approaches are most suitable in meeting investor objectives, and this involves assessing the merits of each fund or strategy from first principles.

RELATED ARTICLES

Expect disappointment as values become stretched

Term deposit investors did not understand the risk

What do fund managers mean by Quality Investing?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.