Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 227

Are robo-advisers relationship-ready or one-night stands?

So, you’ve met the perfect robo-adviser and it’s everything that your human financial adviser isn’t. On call 24/7? Check. Available on any device or computer? Check. Totally into you? Check, check and check … or so it seems from all the promises made on the home page.

But before you go jumping into a relationship with that robo-adviser, think twice and do something more. It may only want the financial advice equivalent of a one-night stand.

Look inside its heart

Robo-advice is simply an automated financial advice process, most commonly leading to a recommended investment. Instead of a person asking questions, you respond on a computer. Then the computer reviews your answers and makes a recommendation, rather than a person making a judgement about your situation.

This can be good or bad. When it’s good, it makes advice available to a lot more people who might have missed out on seeing a human. But when it’s bad, these people can end up receiving advice that might not be suitable for them, and then the relationship does not last.

To find out if a robo is good or bad, find out what makes it tick.

Will it ‘ghost’ you?

Online dating has introduced the concept of ‘ghosting’, where someone in a relationship simply vanishes. A partner suddenly cuts communication with the person they have been seeing, and the person realises the partner has lost interest.

Many robos are ghosts-in-waiting.

Investors became excited about robo-advisers ‘doing an Uber’ on financial advice, so a lot of Silicon Valley types pour money into developing ‘entrepreneurial’ robo platforms. But many have already vanished and many others soon will because they could not attract enough investment to make any money. Betterment, based in the US, is the world’s most successful entrepreneurial robo but it has never made a profit and relies on raising new equity to survive.

Robo offerings from well-known banks, super fund and financial institutions are different. Their job is not to go out and win new money. It is to advise the existing customers more quickly, cheaply and consistently than a human (or many humans) could do. They are far more likely to be there for you tomorrow.

Is it really a ‘keeper’?

Even among financial institutions not every robo is a ‘keeper’. Robos are only as good as the computer programmes that drive them, called ‘algorithms’. These sound super-smart, but are not. An algorithm is simply a formulaic way of responding to an input, like:

  • It is cloudy, I will take my umbrella
  • It is sunny, I will not take my umbrella

However, what if it is cloudy, but we will be parking underground? What if then we decide to briefly walk outside to go to a restaurant? Should we still take an umbrella? What if it’s sunny when we get when we are going – where do we put the umbrella then?

Financial planning questions tend to be like that. Things can quickly become complicated. Robos are evolving and some are beginning to contemplate those highly complex issues, like aged care and estate planning. But writing complex algorithms to take account of many different variables is mind-numbingly hard and expensive, so most people don’t do it.

Instead, they’ve given most robos limited abilities and scope. Mostly, they are confined to recommending an investment from a range of ‘off-the-shelf’ options which is matched to you through your answers to online questions.

Investing is a big, risky deal. To make investment recommendations, the robo must be asking a LOT of questions – right? Unfortunately – wrong. Some barely want to know anything before urging you to invest with them.

It’s all about you (or should be)

In the United States, ‘Target date funds’ only want to know one thing about you: your birthdate. The fund then allocates your assets and automatically converts equities into cash as you age. Personal circumstances, tax considerations and other investments simply don’t come into the mix. There is no ‘right’ number of questions to look for, but one question is probably not enough.

Ideally, before making an investment recommendation, a robo-adviser should ask you questions about at least three things:

1. Risk tolerance: At the bare minimum it should determine your risk tolerance – that is, the amount of investment risk you will feel comfortable with should markets fluctuate.

2. Risk capacity: Ideally, it would then inquire about your risk capacity – that is, if this investment went badly, could you still achieve your goals?

3. Risk required: A good robo will also talk about ‘risk required’ – that is, how much risk you need to take on to reach your goal given your starting point.

But there is a trade-off. Some people get bored answering questions, so many robos have quite deliberately kept their questioning brief, although this makes their recommendation less precise.

‘Swipe left’ on the losers

Robo-advisers must meet the same regulatory and ethical requirements that human advisers are required to meet. Don’t put up with automated advice that is self-centred or uninterested in finding out about you. Like a judgement on Tinder, swipe them left out of your life.

 

Paul Resnik is Co-Founder and Director of Finametrica, a risk profiling system that guides ‘best-fit’ investment decisions.

RELATED ARTICLES

Five charts show predicaments facing financial advice

FoFA, the Failure of Financial Advice, Take 2

Has FoFA become the Failure of Financial Advice?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Latest Updates

A nation of landlords and fund managers

Super and housing dwarf every other asset class in Australia, and they’ve both become too big to fail. Can they continue to grow at current rates, and if so, what are the implications for the economy, work and markets?

Economy

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Retirement

Retiring debt-free may not be the best strategy

Retiring with debt may have advantages. Maintaining a mortgage on the family home can provide a line of credit in retirement for flexibility, extra income, and a DIY reverse mortgage strategy.

Shares

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

The ASX is shrinking not by accident, but by design. A governance model that rewards detachment over ownership is driving capital into private hands and weakening public markets.

Investment strategies

3 reasons the party in big tech stocks may be over

The AI boom has sparked investor euphoria, but under the surface, US big tech is showing cracks - slowing growth, surging capex, and fading dominance signal it's time to question conventional tech optimism.

Investment strategies

Resilience is the new alpha

Trade is now a strategic weapon, reshaping the investment landscape. In this environment, resilient companies - those capable of absorbing shocks and defending margins - are best positioned to outperform.

Shares

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

The next generation of wealth creation is likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. Four signs can alert investors to these companies before the crowds.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.