Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 55

Beware of the curse of liquidity

Stock markets have been bouncing around recently, as conflicting reports arrive about the situation in Ukraine and the effect of possible sanctions. The optimists are seeing any dip in the market as a great opportunity to jump in and buy, while the most extreme of the pessimists are forecasting we are on the brink of another major war.

Having observed the behaviour of markets for more than 50 years, I’ve long given up making forecasts. There has never been a time when the pessimists weren’t with us, but most of them remind me of a stopped clock – right twice a day.

I will certainly be looking at buying opportunities if the market falls, but it is vital for anybody considering investing in shares to understand that volatility is the price we pay for liquidity. Only shares offer the opportunity to buy and sell in small parcels with minimal cost, and have the proceeds in your bank account in five days.

To help individuals understand the way stock markets work, investment guru Warren Buffett used his recent annual newsletter to tell the story of a farm he has owned since 1986. Unless you are a short term trader, in other words a gambler, Buffett believes you should treat your share portfolio in exactly the same way as you would your real estate investments.

“Those people who can sit quietly for decades when they own a farm or apartment too often become frenetic when they are exposed to a string of stock quotations,” Buffett said. “For these investors, liquidity is transferred from the unqualified benefit it should be, to a curse.” He argues that the goal of the ordinary investor should not be to pick winners: they should simply hold a diversified portfolio and stick with it.

Buffett compared the fluctuations in the share market as akin to an erratic neighbour leaning over the fence screaming out offers for his land every day.

“Imagine a moody fellow with a farm bordering on my property who yelled out a price every day at which he would either buy my farm or sell me his – and those prices varied widely over short periods of time depending on his mental state. If his bid today was ridiculously low, I could buy his farm … if it was ridiculously high I could either sell to him or just go on farming.”

Let’s translate that to our local market. Let’s say you owned a blue chip share XYZ Limited that was selling at $40. The company is highly profitable, paying increasing dividends, is well managed, and is a market leader. Suddenly, due to the possibility of war in Ukraine, Wall Street tumbles, traders all around the world panic and sell, and our market drops 3%. Of course, shares in XYZ will fall too, and you may wake up to find your $40 share is now worth $39.

As far as XYZ is concerned, nothing has changed. The business is as strong as ever, and 99.5% of investors are happy to sit tight and enjoy the growing income stream. Only a desperate few panic and sell and take a loss, just because the market in general reacted to events that happened thousands of miles away.

No investment offers the growth potential, ease of ownership, or tax concessions of shares. Buffett’s phrase ‘the curse of liquidity’ is a new one to me, but it sums up markets perfectly. Every investment decision you make will have advantages and disadvantages. The downside of liquidity is that you can be tempted to sell just because you can.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. His advice is general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions. Email: noelwhit@gmail.com

 

2 Comments
Roert
March 29, 2014

I am more nervous when in excessive profit (without a solid foundation ) and tend to take the initial cash out, leaving the accumulated profits to continue compounding (if that is their destiny).

Around 150% profit (cash costs + 150% ) is around where I consider over-valued shares should "fly by themselves" (none of my cash in it).

Obviously, if the value is still there, strong P/E, solid yield and growth (potential and current) and modest gearing/debt, I will continue with the investment (cash involved ) and may take extra opportunities to buy more.

If the reverse happens and the price decreases (under my costs ), I re-assess the investment at (roughly) every 20% drop, as to whether I ride out the dip, or invest more at a discount .. not every investment will be added to, but the option is considered.

I normally only completely exit when i am forced to (take-over or liquidation, etc.) or the investment takes a direction I am not comfortable with (MYR compounding its issues by merging with DJS is an example ... although i will wait for a suitable exit price).

in the exampled farm scenario :- if the neighbours farm went bad (infertile ground ) while i owned it i would be more likely to consider turning it into a shopping center or warehouse space , than cry and sell cheaply .

Gary Whittles
March 29, 2014

I agree we should stay invested - the problem is, when the market falls 20%, there's always some expert who gives great reasons why the market will fall another 30%. Most retirees can tolerate a 20% correction but a halving of their wealth leads to too many sleepless nights. Especially when the ability to return to work is nil.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

How likely are market crashes?

Hold fire on your fund manager over short-term declines

Bigger fall, bigger bounce: small caps into and out of recessions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.