Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 336

Four major insights from APRA’s super heatmap

Large super funds have been waiting anxiously for the release of the regulator’s ‘heatmap’, which assesses the performance of every MySuper product. While many trustees will be relieved by the good results, others will be worried and are likely to face pressure from APRA to perform or merge. The heatmap identifies 416 funds on this link.

The Excel spreadsheet looks unwieldy at first, but it includes a 'User Guide' tab and an explanation of the colours. Funds with dark red or orange for performance or fees will face more scrutiny, and white is good.

MySuper funds are supposed to be simple and low cost, and are the only funds which can accept default contributions. They are usually balanced portfolios with a growth emphasis, and hold about $800 billion of the $3 trillion in super.

APRA defines the objectives and use of its heatmap as:

“The objective of the Heatmap is to provide credible, clear and comparable insights into the outcomes provided by MySuper products in a number of key areas. The Heatmap is expected to drive improvements in outcomes for members by holding RSE licensees publicly accountable for their performance, and in particular highlighting areas of underperformance.”

APRA Deputy Chair Helen Rowell said on the release of the report:

“Australia’s superannuation system delivers sound outcomes for most members, but APRA is determined to weed out the industry’s underperforming tail ... we directly contacted the trustees of the worst performing products and asked them to provide or update action plans outlining how they will address identified weaknesses. If they are unable to make substantial improvements in good time, we will consider other options, including pressuring them to consider a merger or exit the industry.

APRA identified four major insights from its research:

Key insight #1: significant variation of results

Although the funds were all MySuper compliant, a wide range of results were found. APRA focused on five-year performance as the longest time horizon available, although it should aim for at least 10 years. Performance over shorter periods can be affected by cyclical factors where funds with solid processes have not seen sound strategies pay off.

APRA differentiates between ‘single-strategy products’ with specific asset allocations, and ‘lifecycle products’ where the portfolio varies with the age of the member (eg, more into bonds as a member ages).

The five-year net returns on funds with over 60% allocated to growth assets ranged from 5.1% p.a. to 9.5% p.a. in single-strategy products (median 7.4%) and from 5.6% p.a. to 9.6% p.a. (median 7.9%) in lifecycle stages. Offered by many leading brands, 23 funds performed well below the industry average.

APRA makes the valid point that many other fund comparisons use a wide range of growth bands (such as 60% to 80%) in evaluating peer performance, which disadvantages funds at the lower end of the scale when markets are strong. Instead, APRA has taken the average allocation to growth assets and compared the funds with their five-year Net Investment Return (NIR), as plotted below. It shows that even allowing for risk, results vary significantly.

Key insight #2: underperformance in all industry segments and risk profiles

Underperformance was found in both single strategy and lifecycle stages with similar allocations to growth assets.

APRA built a Simple Reference Portfolio of passive, low-cost, liquid investments as a reference point. The figure below highlights underperforming funds and the level of underperformance. The colours are the same as used in the main heatmap, with dark red for poor results and white for acceptable (APRA deliberately avoids the endorsement implied by green).

Key insight #3: more single-strategy products outperformed than lifecycle products

APRA reports that of the 59 single-investment strategy products, 34 (or 58%) outperformed the Simple Reference Portfolio over the five years to 30 June 2019. However, of the 204 lifecycle stage products, only 74 lifecycle stages (or 36%) outperformed.

Following the introduction of MySuper, many retail funds rushed to lifecycle solutions, putting more money into defensive assets as a person ages. This has not paid off as equity markets have rallied strongly, and now, new bond investments are rolling into funds with rates less than 1.5% and long durations. We should expect many of the lifecycle strategies to be critically reviewed by APRA, trustees and members.

APRA has finally taken a stance on the definition of ‘defensive’ assets. Some super funds include infrastructure and property as defensive, where in reality, they have growth characteristics rather than the portfolio protection of government bonds. APRA has decided that listed infrastructure and property should be classified at 100% growth, while unlisted are 75% growth and 25% defensive. 

Key insight #4: fee impact varies significantly based on account balance size

Figure 16 below shows the range of administration fees charged to MySuper products as a percentage of a $10,000 account balance. As a sign of the impact of expenses on low balances, 42% of funds have a fee in excess of 1%, with some over 1.5%. These are supposed to be low cost, simple options. Again, APRA uses the heatmap colours to show which fee levels are unacceptable.

Responses to the heatmap

No fund should only be judged by the colour in one category. Some of the more expensive funds are also the top performers. There are winners and losers among both the retail and the industry funds, and peak groups have advised fund members to consider a wider perspective. 

The Financial Services Council jumped to defend retail funds, with CEO Sally Loane saying:

“The heatmap may tell you that other funds have had higher returns over five years, but if you’re close to retirement you might be far more concerned with how your fund is managing the risks of a market downturn to safeguard your retirement savings. The heatmaps don’t reflect that ... The heatmap doesn’t tell you how your super has performed over your lifetime, it can’t tell you whether your fund invests in accordance with your ethical and philosophical beliefs, and it doesn’t tell you what additional services they offer to help you manage your savings.

The media headlines have already focussed on particular examples, and their trustees will need to address the results. For example, some BT Super funds are flush with deep red colours and must face APRA’s gaze, and only 15 funds scored ‘white’ across all categories.

An industry fund with some deep red, Christian Super, which traditionally takes a more defensive investment approach, said the heatmap may cause investment teams to focus too much on peer performance resulting in herding of results to aviod becoming an outlier.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (see ASFA website) has also urged caution, with CEO Martin Fahy saying:

“Let’s be careful however not to jump to erroneous conclusions that may impact the entire category, or damage member outcomes with knee-jerk reactions from anti-retirement groups … achieving sound investment performance and broader member outcomes is a long-term journey, it’s not measured in terms of years, it’s measured in terms of decades.”

Other industry participants, such as SuperRatings, question why APRA is even publishing such results, arguing a regulator should be regulating not managing a public scoring system 

The bottom line is the industry must accept the regular updates from an emboldened APRA, and it just became even more difficult to discharge the duties of a super trustee.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Firstlinks.

 

1 Comments
SMSF Trustee
December 12, 2019

A few comments:



1) Lifecycle products are nonsense. An attempt to turn individual indifference (selecting the 'default' option seeming to imply that the member is indifferent) into uniformity. And the old theory that you need to increase the fixed income and reduce the growth as you age is stupidity. If you went into a high growth version when you started work in your 20's and have kept contributing then you'll probably have a portfolio that has grown enough to have plenty of room (buffer) to withstand more of the same volatility you've been living with for 40 years!

2) I disagree with the interpretation of the chart in key insight #1. Apart from a few strong performers at each risk level, that looks to me like a very tightly bunched group all along the risk spectrum. Also, despite all the headlines about 'weeding out underperformers', there don't seem to be any in that chart. At least not in the same sense that there are clear outperformers. (There are no dots as far below the averaging line as there are dots above it.)

3) Christian Super's comment is curious. Funds have been herding for years, thanks to all manner of performance tables. This heat map is just another performance report. But isn't the whole idea of introducing MySuper to try to make sure that everyone gets a similar outcome to everyone else, with no one lagging well behind? If by some miracle everyone could do whatever those handful of top performers did, then we'd just get a report that showed everyone close to a line running at a higher trajectory. Presumably everyone would then be happy that all had herded to the same result! Though I'm sure that the media would point out the funds that are a bit below the average and lambast them for not doing as well as others, even though they did brilliantly!


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Checking the temperature of the APRA heatmap

The opportunity cost of low fee structures

APRA December 2012 Quarterly Superannuation Performance

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

11 lessons from my lousy $50K profit on Afterpay

Afterpay listed at $1 in 2016 and traded recently at $70. How should an investor treat a small holding in a 70-bagger when each new level defies the experts? Should true believers let the profits run?

Which companies will do well in the turmoil of 2020?

While the shutting of Australia’s borders to international travellers and quarantine measures is damaging to certain sectors of the economy, it is not uniformly negative for all companies.

Why are we convinced 'this time it's different'?

Investors tend to overstate the impact on investments when something significant happens and they assume the future will be different. COVID-19 has been dramatic, but is it really that unusual?

Howard Marks' anatomy of an unexpected rally

Markets can swing quickly from optimism to pessimism, and while there are more positives now than in the bleak early days in March, the market is ignoring many negatives. Risk is not rewarded at these levels.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 363

The stock market continues to defy most equity pundits and push through fears of ongoing recession, job losses, business closures and a second virus wave. But if there's one factor in Australia specifically that is seriously underestimated, it is the loss of stimulus from population growth and immigration.

  • 25 June 2020

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 364

Australian shares had their biggest annual loss for eight years in FY20 while Wall Street just had its best quarter since 1987. Whatever happens from here, we will look back in a couple of years and say the outcome was obvious. We will either say, "Of course markets rose as governments injected unlimited liquidity, medical science found treatments and the economy rebounded" or "Of course markets fell as businesses collapsed, millions of jobs were lost forever, the virus was resilient and consumers changed forever."

  • 1 July 2020

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

11 lessons from my lousy $50K profit on Afterpay

Afterpay listed at $1 in 2016 and traded recently at $70. How should an investor treat a small holding in a 70-bagger when each new level defies the experts? Should true believers let the profits run?

Shares

How did shares perform in FY20 and where to from here?

Compared with most years in the last decade, FY20 performed poorly due to the virus, and now dividends are falling. There are three things to watch this year as support policies are wound back.

Shares

Which companies will do well in the turmoil of 2020?

While the shutting of Australia’s borders to international travellers and quarantine measures is damaging to certain sectors of the economy, it is not uniformly negative for all companies.

Investment strategies

Six types of big data are unlocking real insights

Data science is increasingly embedded into the research process of investment teams with the resources to exploit new technologies. The way the data is integrated and interpreted is crucial.

Investing

Will value stocks benefit from the market's inflection point?

As the world gradually emerges from the aftermath of COVID-19, many are questioning if now is value’s time to shine? How can value stocks deliver outperformance in today’s environment?

Fixed interest

Less than 1% for 100 years: watch the price risk on long bonds

Do you think investors can only lose heavily on bonds if the credit defaults? When bondholders accept 0.88% for 100 years, there is great potential for serious pain somewhere along the journey.

Economy

Five industries profoundly changed by COVID-19

Even when the virus is finally contained, the business landscape will look very different. A critical issue is the ability of consumers to find product substitutes. Many people like what they find.

Exchange traded products

Wirecard shows not all ethical ETFs pass the smell test

The strictness of screening processes can vary between ethical ETFs, and many rely on indices without additional oversight. This can result in stock inclusions that may not pass the ethical ‘smell test’.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.