Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 388

How to give retirees the confidence to spend

Australia has one of the best retirement systems in the world for accumulating savings. Yet, like many other countries, we continue to struggle with how to design an efficient retirement spending system. To some extent, this can be attributed to the absence of a clear purpose as to what we are trying to achieve.

Objectives not passed into law

Following a recommendation by the Financial System Inquiry, the Superannuation (Objective) Bill was introduced to Parliament in 2016 to establish the primary objective of super: “to provide income in retirement to substitute or supplement the age pension”.

While it is a start, it does not provide a lot of direction. The Explanatory Memorandum provided more guidance, and two of the proposed subsidiary objectives noted at the time were to facilitate consumption smoothing over the course of an individual’s life, and to manage risks in retirement.

Unfortunately, these objectives have lapsed in Parliament, so we still have some uncertainty about the overall pathway to better retirement outcomes.

More recently, in September 2019, Treasurer Josh Frydenberg announced a review into the retirement income system as recommended by the Productivity Commission in its report, Superannuation: Assessing Efficiency and Competitiveness.

The panel appointed to run this important review, released on 20 November 2020, was given terms of reference that included:

“It is important that the system allows Australians to achieve adequate retirement incomes, is fiscally sustainable and provides appropriate incentives for self-provision in retirement.”

In this context, the panel identified four principles to assess the performance of Australia’s retirement income system:

  • adequacy
  • equity
  • sustainability
  • cohesion

This latter one is particularly important. How do the various parts of the system work together to improve retirement outcomes in Australia?

Retirees in ‘the middle’

It is only recently that a significant number of Australians began retiring with material retirement savings, with around 35% of superannuation balances at retirement reaching $250,000 or more. Over the next 20 years, this is set to change with almost 65% reaching that level. While around 15% of superannuation balances will exceed $750,000 in 20 years’ time, as a proportion, retirees in ‘the middle’ will double from around 25% to 50%.

Retirees in this ‘middle’ group are likely to be eligible for a part age pension for a substantial portion of their retirement and, as a result, the means test rules will be important for them. 

Legislation was also passed in February 2019 to amend the means test rules that apply to longevity protection products with effect from 1 July 2019. Under the new rules, only 60% of the purchase amount of a lifetime income stream is an assessable asset and only 60% of the payments are income.

These regulatory changes should, in time, promote the development of new longevity protection products such as deferred lifetime annuities (DLAs) or deferred group self-annuitisation (GSA) products, which should help retirees plan their retirement spending with more confidence.

However, they add further complexity. Consider a person who is a homeowner, who retires at age 67 with a superannuation account balance of $500,000 and who uses $50,000 to purchase a DLA. With 40% of the purchase price (or $20,000) no longer counting for the assets test, this person will be entitled to $1,560 per annum more in age pension payments for around 10 years.

The confidence to spend

Longevity risk is one of the major risks faced by retirees. The fear of running out of money and the uncertainty about how long a retiree might live causes many to try to manage their own longevity risk by spending cautiously. In addition to its favourable treatment under the means tests, a DLA partially solves that problem by providing a guaranteed amount of income for life once payments commence.

This allows retirees to more safely draw down the remainder of their savings up to that point, thereby enjoying a lifestyle that is better than would otherwise be the case during the early and more active years of retirement.

Unfortunately, DLAs and other annuity products are often criticised as being ‘expensive’. The question is: compared to what? Many people undervalue the insurance component of the product but also because of the conservative nature of the investments typically backing these products. Retirees who want to leave a bequest to their family also prefer to add a death benefit to the product, which also makes them more ‘expensive’.

Maybe it’s time to go ‘back to the future’, where the annuity is a form of ‘with profits’ or unit-linked policy so that the policyholder shares the investment return (and risk). The number of units paid each year until death would remain the same, but the dollar amount would vary depending on the performance of the underlying investments selected by the retiree.

Unit-linked DLAs would have two distinct advantages over traditional annuities.

First, these products could remain invested in more growth assets during the deferral period, much like an account-based pension (ABP), with retirees able to dial down the risk profile of the investments as they get older, either by choice or automatically, via a form of life cycle investment.

Second, they would be more attractive to advisers who understand investment risk and return and can assist their clients. As annuities are not well understood in the general community, some form of guidance or advice will be needed to help retirees understand how DLAs and other retirement products can help them in retirement.

Retirement Income Covenant

One of the announcements in the 2020 Federal Budget was the deferral of the Retirement Income Covenant to July 2022, to allow the findings of the Retirement Income Review to inform the discussions and any further consultation.

According to Treasury, the Covenant will codify the requirements and obligations for superannuation trustees to consider the retirement income needs of their members, expanding individuals’ choice of retirement income products and improving standards of living in retirement.

The Covenant is supported by a number of key principles:

  • Trustees should develop a retirement income strategy for members.
  • Trustees should offer all members a comprehensive income product for retirement (CIPR), which, by design, would provide longevity protection and some access to capital.
  • Trustees should provide guidance to help members understand and make choices about the retirement products offered by the fund.

With the release of the Retirement Income Review Final Report and ensuing consultation on the Covenant, we look forward to the introduction of new retirement income products and affordable access to better guidance and advice.

We will then be able to help more members secure a better retirement, where they can spend more of their savings safely, especially in the early years of retirement when they are healthier and more able to enjoy it.

 

Andrew Boal is Head of the Actuaries Institute’s Retirement Strategy Group and CEO at Rice Warner. This article was first published by Your Life Choices and is reproduced with permission.

This article is of a general nature and has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. It has been prepared with due care but no guarantees are provided for the ongoing accuracy or relevance. 

 

9 Comments
Brian Richards
December 20, 2020

If you think the 60% asset/income change will make retirees more confident to spend you should just ask the 300000 retirees who lost there access to a part pension when Scomo retrospectively chaned the assets test limits!. The fact that the government can at any time it chooses (usually just after an election victory)can change the rules is the biggest concern for retirees in my opinion, until this is addressed there will always be anxiety about it. We shuld remember there is a rump of baby boomers yet to retire, a falling number of people in the workforce and fewer new migrants and the cost of the pandemic this will sharpen politicians minds. The family home as an asset will likely be included and maybe a death tax will be introduced hence the best way is to spend sensibly and if you can have a clear sense when you might die start progressively giving your money to your kids before you check out

John Brett
January 05, 2021

I am a self funded retiree with a home. If I run down my super to a level inadequate to support my needs, I would access a reverse mortgage. Simple as that.

PacSun
December 20, 2020

Given the better tax treatment of SUPER taking it as a lump sum on retirement to buy the 4X4, caravan , trip of a lifetime, beach house and THEN line up for a pension (double dippers). That's what is happening in a lot of cases and not what SUPER was made for.

Dudley.
December 19, 2020

"confidence to spend":

High probability of having sufficient post retirement phase capital to be able to afford dying phase age care.

That requires a high probability of returns on capital allocated to the dying phase exceed inflation.

That requires adequate capital not allocated to the dying phase to provide an adequate withdrawals in the retirement phase.

john
December 17, 2020

To encourage take up; I believe the percentages that are assessable need to be a lot lower. Anyone have any thoughts on this ??

Charles Greenway
December 17, 2020

The biggest issue was not addressed. That is the back to front way we tax super.
We could do what a number of other countries do which is to tax super/ retirement income stream upon retirement at normal rates. They do not have an up front contribution tax or a tax on earnings during the accumulation phase, so the final balance ends up a lot higher and it is totally uncomplicated and can be understood by any ten year old. Constant meddling and rule changing by both sides of politics have created uncertainty as well as the most complex system in the world.

Dudley.
December 19, 2020

"tax super/ retirement income stream upon retirement at normal rates", "They do not have an up front contribution tax or a tax on earnings during the accumulation phase":

= no tax on contributions, earnings or withdrawals less than the tax free threshold.

Bruce Gregor
December 17, 2020

I support the concept of a with profits life annuity although I think we need to come up with a new name for it. I notice Greg Combet is now refering to industry funds as profit for members rather than not for profit. Might need the Gruent pannel to come up with the name. Conceptually its a lifetime annuity with investment growth dividends. I also pick uo from your reference to the stalled Objectives that they are exclusively about retirement. Its time to restrict any insurance in super to longevity insurance and have in-employment death and disability cover dealt with in separate legislation.

George
December 17, 2020

The best thing the Government could do for super is sit everyone in a room - not a few experts but also SMSF trustees and fund members - and make the system simpler so everyone can understand it. This new 60% rule for lifetimes income streams is yet another complication. What's the point of a retirement system when hardly anybody understands the detail, even many advisers I have met.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Retirement spending: set the bar lower

Four reasons many Australians will work until they're dead

How to manage the run down in your income in retirement

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

Critics of franking credits are missing the main point. The taxable income of shareholders/taxpayers must also include the company tax previously paid to the ATO before the dividend was distributed. It is fair.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Joe Hockey on the big investment influences on Australia

Former Treasurer Joe Hockey became Australia's Ambassador to the US and he now runs an office in Washington, giving him a unique perspective on geopolitical issues. They have never been so important for investors.

Investment strategies

The tipping point for investing in decarbonisation

Throughout time, transformative technology has changed the course of human history, but it is easy to be lulled into believing new technology will also transform investment returns. Where's the tipping point?

Exchange traded products

The options to gain equity exposure with less risk

Equity investing pays off over long terms but comes with risks in the short term that many people cannot tolerate, especially retirees preserving capital. There are ways to invest in stocks with little downside.

Exchange traded products

8 ways LIC bonus options can benefit investors

Bonus options issued by Listed Investment Companies (LICs) deliver many advantages but there is a potential dilutionary impact if options are exercised well below the share price. This must be factored in.

Retirement

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Investment strategies

Three demographic themes shaping investments for the future

Focussing on companies that will benefit from slow moving, long duration and highly predictable demographic trends can help investors predict future opportunities. Three main themes stand out.

Fixed interest

It's not high return/risk equities versus low return/risk bonds

High-yield bonds carry more risk than investment grade but they offer higher income returns. An allocation to high-yield bonds in a portfolio - alongside equities and other bonds – is worth considering.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.