Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 366

Income investing during COVID-19 demands a dual technique

Covid-19 has created one of the biggest market falls (or drawdown) in Australian equity earnings in history, even bigger than during the GFC. Income investors are understandably concerned about the impact the shutdowns and ongoing social distancing will have on the ability of Australian equities to pay dividends.

This article discusses our forecast of the near-term dividend outlook and examines how active managers can help investors navigate this unique moment with the objective of creating a sustainable income stream.

Equity income and Australian dividend outlook

The near-term outlook for dividends remains challenging. At the time of writing, based on broker consensus estimated for next 12 months dividends, the dollar dividend stream from the February (pre-COVID-19) peak for the broad market (S&P/ASX 200) will be down more than 32% (and down 24% for the stocks in our Equity Income strategy).

We expect the income stream to come down further as dividend forecasts published by stockbroking analysts have yet to fully account for the effect that the reduced company earnings will have on dividends.

Our own 2020 COVID-19 dividend profile work suggests that the full extent of downgrades to the income stream for the broader Australian market will be in the order of approximately 40% down on February estimates (and for our Equity Income strategy, down ~30%) as shown below. See notes at end of the article for more details on Next 12 months (NTM) calculations.

A crisis and an opportunity

We recognise that the fall in income is a critical issue for investors such as retirees who rely on that income for their living expenses. However, without minimising the seriousness of that issue, we believe this crisis is an opportunity for active managers like ourselves to build a diversified portfolio of businesses with the ability to generate sustainable dividends at once-in-a-lifetime valuations.

For an income-oriented strategy, successfully navigating these market conditions requires a balancing act that entails a nuanced approach satisfying both of the following two conditions:

  1. Ensure that the long-term income potential of the portfolio remains robust, i.e. focus on the long-term business outlook and dividend potential of the portfolio companies.
  2. Deliver the best possible income stream over the course of the near-term business disruptions caused by the pandemic, i.e. ensure that there is a reasonable level of income in the coming 12 to 24 months to support income requirements.

The need to optimise across these two parameters illustrates an important benefit of active management over passive or ‘smart beta’ strategies at this critical juncture.

For example, a passive manager who indiscriminately sells stocks where the dividend is cut to $0 will likely be selling uniquely profitable and monopolistic businesses at historically low valuations. Similarly, buying stocks in sectors where dividends haven’t been reduced to chase higher short-term income will entail paying a significant valuation premium and must be done with a discriminating eye towards long-term dividend sustainability. The combined effect of such a robotic approach to income investing is likely to result in a significant impairment of the long-term income potential for investors in these passive, yield-chasing strategies.

What’s called for at this moment of market dislocation is a case-by-case assessment of each company’s prospects by a seasoned team of sector specialists to parse the likely winners from losers. We use a dual track framework that examines both the short- and long-term income potential of each portfolio company.

Deep fundamental analysis of short-term impact

Since the start of the covid-19 crisis, each stock in our portfolios and investible universe has undergone a '2020 COVID-19 Dividend Profile' to accompany the 'Sustainable Dividend' analysis. This analysis more precisely calibrates each stock's downside income risk, and understands which stocks should see dividends recover relatively quickly versus those that are likely permanently impaired.

Our recent focus has been on the following market segments:

  • Companies that 'make money while you sleep' rather than those that have a more 'transactional' nature
  • Exiting positions that are most vulnerable to the adverse outcomes from social restrictions, and
  • Purchasing undervalued companies that have not acted as defensive as they genuinely are.

Quantifying dividend sustainability and long-term income potential

Portfolios are constructed from stocks based on their ability to pay a forward looking 'Sustainable Dividend' rather than a current or consensus dividend. We judge each company’s dividend paying power by assessing their free cash flow generation through different stages of the economic cycle. The analysts then model a two-year bear-case scenario, i.e. can a dividend be paid in eight out of the next 10 years? The 8/10 approach considers a significant downside scenario for each company and what level of dividend they can pay post a crisis.

The unprecedented impacts from covid-19 mean that for a number of companies, short-term expectations for dividends have fallen below the sustainable dividend forecast. Critically, though, where the long-term sustainable dividend potential remains robust, we continue to hold them.

"We continue to think that it is usually foolish to part with an interest in a business that is both understandable and durably wonderful. Business interests of that kind are simply too hard to replace." - Warren Buffett

Using this dual track analytical framework balances long-term dividend potential and short-term income protection. The aim is to re-position income strategies to remain well positioned to provide investors with portfolios built on a foundation of sustainable dividends for the long-term.

 

Will Baylis is a Portfolio Manager for the Legg Mason Martin Currie Equity Income Fund. Legg Mason is a sponsor of Firstlinks. The information provided should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. Please consider the appropriateness of this information, in light of your own objectives, financial situation or needs before making any decision.

For more articles and papers from Legg Mason, please click here.

 

Source: Martin Currie as of 29/05/2020, Next 12 Months (NTM) Income yield is calculated using the weighted average of broker consensus forecasts of each portfolio holding –because of this, the returns quoted are estimated figures and are therefore not guaranteed. Assumes zero percent tax rate and full franking benefits realised in tax return for Martin Currie Equity Income.

RELATED ARTICLES

Corporate bond opportunities in today’s market

How to choose a good fund manager

Duration: Friend or foe in a defensive allocation?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.