Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 479

Lessons for our Year 12 economics students and investors

October and November are big months for Year 12 students across Australia. The next generation is completing its final school exams and the rite of passage into the outside world of work and further studies.

In an investment context, it is timely to consider the differing elements of the subject of economics being studied by our future leaders, and how it is changing.

The lessons from economics are expanding

Economics is about the allocation of scarce resources for production, distribution and consumption. For decades, the Year 12 curriculum has covered economic growth, unemployment, inflation, external trade and exchange rates, and then assessed available tools including fiscal, monetary, microeconomics and labour policy.

Progressively more evident in the school curriculum is that the natural environment is materially edging its way into the mix. Topics like sustainable development, externalities, market failures, public and private goods and environmental issues (including climate change and depletion of non-renewable resources) are now key areas studied.

And with good reason. Recent research by the Australian Conservation Foundation, supported by Australian Ethical, shows that roughly half Australia’s GDP (49.3% or $892.8 billion*) has a moderate to very high direct dependence on nature, and indirectly every single dollar that flows through the economy depends on the health and survival of natural systems.

So, at the core of the lessons for students and for investors alike is how might we protect nature’s fine balance and maintain its integrity to support a long-term healthy society and the linked economy and investment environment.

A new set of goals for nature is coming

This will be the subject of COP-15 to be held in December 2022. The UN Biodiversity Conference will convene governments from around the world to agree to a new set of goals for nature over the next decade with this objective in mind.

At Australian Ethical, we are aligned with the interest of the final year students in wanting to understand the economic paradigms around the environment – its strengths, weaknesses and challenges - and how we might position for long-term success.

1. Economics history and private goods

Economics has a multi-century history, with many high-profile contributors, including Adam Smith, Milton Friedman and John Maynard Keynes. It also has had a fair history of success, which in part is built on some bruising experiences of the past. Year 12 students can marvel on how effective application of monetary and fiscal policy might support more stable economic cycles, or how microeconomics can lead to improved productivity.

If we delve into this success, however, much of it has been around private goods, which are goods where the utility or benefit derives to its owner.

Private goods and linked markets by their very nature tend to be more efficient allocators of assets. Dating all the way back to Adam Smith in the 1700s and the 'invisible hand', free markets support effective production and pricing of products and services. While over the years a range of flaws have emerged (such as labour market exploitation and market concentration) that need regulations to address them, in general, competitive markets have supported strong global outcomes with innovation and international trade uplifting many communities around the world.

As investors, we too have tended to focus on the private markets and their success. There have been a breadth of companies available for investment selling private goods and services that have delivered strong investment returns over an extended period.

2. Challenges with public goods and especially the environment

The challenge for economics has been public goods. These are goods, like the environment, where one can’t exclude a consumer from enjoying the benefit, even if they are not willing to pay.

The core of the problem is market failure, as the price mechanism only takes into account the private benefits and costs of production to consumers and producers and does not consider the wider cost (or externality) to the public good (in this case the environment).

To address this market failure, it has been up to the government to set up the system so that the environment is not overlooked in private transactions. And our year 12 students have seen plenty of evidence of success, such as:

  • banning CFCs to protect the ozone layer
  • making single use plastics and certain chemicals illegal
  • using water rights to improve river water usage.

Unfortunately, the big global issues like climate change and biodiversity, where individual company and country action can seem minor relative to the issue, have been challenging. The preferred economic solution here is placing a tax or fee on production or consumption that approximates the environmental cost of this economic activity, and in effect internalising the externality.

But carbon taxes and levies have been politically problematic, with countries concerned around their relative positioning versus other countries not taking similar action. The rapid changes of political leadership (linked to proposed carbon taxes) and extended international negotiations, demonstrate the political complexity.

3. Identifying the need for a sustainable solution

With this economic division between private and public goods over the past several decades we have seen a dichotomy:  strong businesses and market outcomes, but materially weaker environmental conditions.

While Australia prior to the pandemic had not had a recession for almost 30 years, Australia’s recent State of the Environment report now rates our country as on a poor rating across a host of ecological metrics. And while over 1 billion people have lifted themselves out of extreme poverty in the last 25 years around the world~, over that same period our global temperature has increased by over half-a-degree to be 1.2 degrees higher than pre-industrial times^.

A sustainable approach towards economics is needed because we can’t live with this dichotomy forever. Sustainable development requires a healthy environment to underpin long term multi-generational economic success. We need both strong economic and environmental outcomes.

4. Sustainable pathways for economics and investors

The core of the challenge has been addressing private transactions that are generating negative externalities, or what are sometimes called ‘free riders’.

Fortunately, economics has many tools beyond taxes or levies which which can influence supply and demand and perhaps generate positive externalities.

We have seen governments put in place programmes to support supply and lower costs of products that are avoiding emissions in energy generation. Government initiatives including clean energy subsidies, financing incentives and renewable energy zones. Plus, there is also emission reduction funding and linked carbon credits.

Investors play a role as well. In Australia, where our superannuation assets are now larger than GDP, the role of investors can tilt the economic scales materially. And presently a shift to a more flexible renewable energy grid, is part of the superannuation sector conversation.

Back to our year 12 students and their teachers

We should be grateful for their broader focus and considering the environment more meaningfully in the syllabus. Our future leaders will think more creatively about our challenges and build solutions ranging from economic policy settings to new technology. But this is an urgent and complex challenge, and in the meantime, investors should also be aware of externalities and free riders and look for investments that drive long term strong sustainable outcomes with our scarce global resources in mind.

 

References

*Australian Conservation Foundation; The nature-based economy: How Australia’s prosperity depends on nature; September 2022.

~World Bank: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2018/09/19/decline-of-global-extreme-poverty-continues-but-has-slowed-world-bank

^World Meteorological Organization (2021). WMO Statement on the State of the Global Climate in 2020. WMO-No. 1264. Geneva. ISBN 978-92-63-11264-4.

 

Angus Dennis is Investment Director at Australian Ethical, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This information is of a general nature and is not intended to provide you with financial advice or take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs.

For over 35 years, Australian Ethical has used its Ethical Charter to evaluate companies and the broader impact they play on the environment and society. We invest in portfolios that have a net benefit to this broader set of stakeholders, so we see an overweight in our listed equity portfolios to sectors like renewables and healthcare, and we avoid a range of companies with net negative contribution including fossil fuels, that can fit within the ‘free rider’ category. We also specifically target unlisted renewables via a range of strategies including catalytic private equity and infrastructure like equity and debt.

For more articles and papers from Australian Ethical, please click here.

 

6 Comments
Mark Hayden
October 17, 2022

Long-term investors must consider sustainability. Hence it is good to read articles like this one that raise some big picture economic matters.

Jan H
October 15, 2022

This is the very first time I have heard any economist state a healthy environment is critical to our survival. Environmental externalities are never included in the costs of production. Profits would be a lot less were they counted as liabilities on the balance sheet. Of course, environmentalists have been talking about this for many decades. So it is quite a surprise economists are now coming to this view.

Ted
October 16, 2022

Good on you. We need more focus on social costs and benefits than private costs and benefits if our ecosystem is to survive with us in it?

Ted
October 15, 2022

Hopefully, the limitations of orthodox economic theory with regard to...unemployment, inflation, inequality and environmental damage are also taught in Economics 101. Our current mess with regard to the mix of monetary, fiscal and microeconomic policy shows the failures of orthodox economic policy prescriptions in the near term. Similarly, greater equality and sustainability are key to our long term survival. A well-timed article!! and not just for HSC students?

Trevor
October 13, 2022

Will Stuart: You say: "hopefully there is also a dash of Economics 101 taught too." I doubt that there is enough time left for any of that sort of intellectual rubbish. Economics. Why take the risk? I wonder if the students are being taught the real economics of "saving the planet" ?

will stuart
October 12, 2022

hopefully there is also a dash of Economics 101 taught too.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The impact of inflation on retirement incomes

Ethical investing responding to some short-term challenges

Three reasons why optimism pays for investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.