Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 608

REITs: a haven in a Trumpian world?

The dramatic changes to U.S. tariffs settings challenges the financial market’s Trump pro-growth market narrative which heralded the start of 2025. Instead, investors now face conditions which look likely to invoke a global economic slowdown, if not recession, with significant pressure on corporate earnings from higher costs together with unsettled consumer demand and production patterns.

Regardless of where Trump’s tariffs settle, the market is coming to terms with higher risk hurdles when assessing investments. Whilst we cannot be sure about absolute outcomes, in this environment we believe REITs are relatively well placed to produce competitive risk adjusted returns. As we will explain, income security generated by select real estate combined with the operating and capital strength of REITs underpin our belief.

The fundamentals underlying our optimism

We see the biggest threat to our constructive thesis on REITs relate to a scenario involving the onset of stagflation and acknowledge that a deep and extended period of economic contraction will increasingly weigh on real estate returns. We also can not dismiss the possibility of additional imposts on real estate as Trump seeks to find alternate sources of income to provide tax relief for businesses and ordinary citizens. Given Trump’s background, this latter risk would be somewhat surprising.

Our reasons for optimism are starting to play out. Whilst Global REITs have not been spared in the broad sell down of publicly market investments, as investors seek less economically sensitive areas of the market they have outperformed broad equities thus far in 2025. Thanks to underlying strong fundamentals, we believe there is scope for this trend to continue.

Figure 1: Global Equity Performance CYTD

Source: MSCI World Index (Local Currency). 07 April 2025

Importantly, to date, bond yields have been relatively stable and there is room for central banks to reduce interest rates should there be clear evidence of a rapidly deteriorating economy and/or reduced consumer price inflation. That said, core inflation dynamics remain challenging, and central banks will be loath to repeat the mistakes of past stock market corrections such as that which occurred post the 1987 crash when emergency rate cuts fuelled higher inflation. Whilst REITs will not be totally immune, their earnings are less sensitive to slowing economic activity and increasing costs pressures.

Critically, real estate and REIT earnings are not directly affected by changes to tariffs.

From an operating expense perspective, REIT outgoings largely relate to property taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management and insurance. Hence, by and large, these are unaffected by tariffs.

In many underlying real estate categories, REIT revenue (rental) streams are relatively secure thanks to medium to long-term lease contracts, often three to 10 years in duration, which provide cashflow security. Where these lease structures are common, industrial and office property are perhaps the most vulnerable to a prolonged economic slowdown thanks to diminished tenant demand. We are significantly underweight REITs with office and warehouse exposures, in total representing less than 15% of the portfolio, with the U.S. being less than half this figure.

In other segments such as residential, self-storage, and hotels, income is often derived from short term lettings. In some of these instances, occupier demand is needs-based and hence income tends to be relatively resilient. Clearly hotels are the most economically sensitive to which we have minimal exposure. Of course, this income profile is subject to tenant credit. We would note that the largest single tenant underlying our REIT property portfolios generates less than 2% of total portfolio income [Astria Senior Living].

Furthermore, increased tariffs will put further upward pressure on building material replacement costs, making real estate development economics even more challenging unless rents rise meaningfully. Of course, tenant demand is critical but weaker demand will not be compounded by a growing supply overhang and in an environment where real estate vacancy rates are historically low.

For broader equities investors, we believe the picture is more challenging. Trump’s policies are likely to put pressure on corporate profits and margins as businesses will find it difficult to pass on the full cost of higher import prices to their customers. De-globalisation will create other challenges including sources of production, re shaping of supply chains and capital needs for businesses. We expect in this environment greater investor scrutiny on fundamental value and real cashflows from business models that have been over hyped and overpriced.

Figure 2: Relative EV/EBITDA spreads

Source: Resolution Capital. Spreads calculated as EV/EBITDA difference between FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Index and MSCI World Index. 28 February 2025

Crucially, we do not believe current REIT earnings multiples takes into account the key replacement cost dynamic. Based on this fundamental tangible quality, by our estimates, commercial real estate is currently trading at/below replacement costs with low new construction. Consequently, REITs multiples appear on the surface to be very undemanding versus broader equities. Hence, the sector could benefit from investors continuing to rotate from more economically sensitive sectors into more defensive cashflows. It is reasonable that investors will view real estate as being a relatively secure investment and generating meaningful income distributions (REIT legislation requires a substantial payout of after depreciation earnings).

From a capital perspective, the REIT sector is in a strong financial position. By and large, the sector doesn’t require meaningful additional debt or equity to meet any additional capital commitments, dividends are covered by operating cashflows and refi needs are manageable. Indeed, REIT capital structures are arguably stronger today than in any period entering an economic slowdown over the past 30 years. Most debt is structured with fixed interest rates generally for more than three years, cushioning earnings from short term market rate volatility.

Whilst an outcome of bottom-up analysis, towards late 2024 and into early 2025 we reduced our exposure to the U.S. REITs and are now meaningfully underweight the U.S. market for the first time since 2015. We have positioned the portfolio away from the more economically sensitive sectors and little development exposure. REIT capital structures are robust and at this stage we see no need to meaningfully increase cash levels. In addition, we will continue to focus on those REITs best placed to withstand more challenging tenant demand conditions.

 

Andrew Parsons is a Co-Founder and Chief Investment Officer at Resolution Capital, an affiliate manager of Pinnacle Investment Management. Pinnacle is a sponsor of Firstlinks. Resolution has launched the only active GREIT Fund in Australia (ASX:RCAP).

This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs, and because of that, reliance should not be placed on this information as the basis for making an investment, financial or other decision.

For more articles and papers from Pinnacle Investment Management and affiliate managers, click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

100 years of tariff lessons

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

9 winning investment strategies

There are many ways to invest in stocks, but some strategies are more effective than others. Here are nine tried and tested investment approaches - choosing one of these can improve your chances of reaching your financial goals.

Latest Updates

Taxation

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

7 key charts on the state of the Australian property market

The Australian property market stirs fierce debate - often bullish optimism versus crash predictions. But beyond the noise, seven charts reveal what's really driving prices and the outlook moving forward.

A simple alternative to the $3 million super tax

Division 296 aims to introduce improved fairness into the superannuation system, yet is overly complex. This scours the world for better ideas and suggests a simpler alternative which can achieve the same goals.

CBA and the index conundrum for super funds

After the hyperbolic rise in CBA shares, super funds are floating the idea of carving out the weightings of ASX bank securities and indexing them within their portfolios. This looks at why that might be a big error.

Strategy

10 policies to drive Australian productivity higher

Here's a comprehensive list of proposed reforms to fix Australia's stagnating economy, including introducing a flat income tax rate, reducing migration, and making childcare tax-deductible.

Interviews

Where to find big winners in Asia

As more money looks for a home outside the US, Asia may soon get some love. Fidelity's Anthony Srom outlines the best places in Asia to invest, including in Chinese consumer names, Indian financials, and Thailand.

Investment strategies

We have trouble understanding the time value of money

We overvalue the present and underestimate the future - it’s a cognitive glitch called hyperbolic discounting. It affects savings, spending, and loans, and it's more common - and costly - than we think. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.