Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 3

Self managed super's best-kept secret

If ‘SMSF’ were a corporate brand, its marketing department would be the most successful in superannuation history. Barely a day goes by without some media mention of the extraordinary success of SMSFs. A massive industry of advisers, accountants and technology providers has flourished, leaving the big fund managers with relatively minor roles. Among the barrage of statistics, where billions and trillions are more common than mere millions, is a startling fact. The big retail players always had a strong response to SMSFs in their kit bag. They just didn’t explain it to enough customers.

It’s called the ‘super wrap’, and if promoted strongly, it could have saved at least $100 billion from drifting away from major fund managers into SMSFs, and in many cases, be a better investment platform for the client.

Super wraps are administrative platforms that give the control, potential lower cost and choice of an SMSF without the burden of becoming a trustee, setting up accounts and producing separate tax returns each year. They are available through most large retail funds, and industry funds such as AustralianSuper. In all these wraps, investors have access to ASX-listed securities, including the hybrids much-loved by retirees, a wide range of term deposits, good cash facilities and the widest array of managed funds anyone is ever likely to want. In some cases, close to a thousand funds. The only major asset class not available on a wrap is direct residential and commercial property. However, only about 15% of SMSF assets are in direct property, so this is not a limitation for most investors. In fact, a large, illiquid, undiversified asset such as property is probably not the best way to finance a retirement where regular drawdowns are needed in the pension phase.

At the end of each financial year, the investor receives one statement from the super wrap provider, and all the paperwork, corporate actions, tax treatments and cash flows have been covered. All investment management is carried out by clients and their advisers, while the super wrap handles custody and trustee obligations.

Despite the widespread availability of this product, the SMSF momentum shows no sign of easing, as the recently released ATO statistical report demonstrates. Sometime this year, the one millionth person will become a trustee of an SMSF, signing up at the rate of over 100 a day.

Equally impressive is the asset growth, now almost one-third of all superannuation and recently reaching $500 billion, growing far quicker than APRA-regulated funds. Industry consultant, Tria Investment Partners, estimates that 50,000 members of large funds depart for SMSFs each year, taking $17 billion with them in 2012. That’s about 30% of large fund net inflows.

The missed opportunity for super wraps is emphasised by considering the natural progression for many people through superannuation. At one extreme are millions of disengaged investors who find superannuation jargon as confusing, and interesting, as molecular physics. The ANZ Bank Survey of Adult Financial Literacy for December 2011 found that only 69% of people even look at their superannuation statements, and one-third said they found them difficult to understand. Their super goes into default options with industry funds or multi manager options with retail funds, and they get on with their lives.

Three decades later, the other extreme kicks in. These once disengaged investors are now at the end of their careers, and their mates around the barbeque keep talking about self managed super. It has become as ubiquitous as German prestige cars and private school educations for those with medium to high incomes. Their accountant already handles the business and personal accounts, and he’ll do an SMSF for a few thousand dollars a year more.

It’s an extraordinary shift in responsibility that comes with an 80 page trust deed of obligations and the threat of severe penalties if they make a mistake. Members are trustees who must design an investment strategy and choose investments from an infinite array, often based on their cursory understanding of market fundamentals. They have to manage an administrative system, and take personal responsibility for understanding the rapidly changing rules of superannuation. At the stage in life when they were anticipating the prospect of a relaxing retirement, they are thrust into the world of non-concessionals, recontributions and TTRs. What on earth are they?

According to a 2011 ATO survey of SMSF trustees, the most common causes of difficulties managing an SMSF are that the laws and regulations keep changing, and there is so much to know and understand. The required skills can take years to acquire, if ever. The ATO, in its role as the regulator of self managed super, is taking an increasing tougher stance against funds that fail to meet their compliance obligations. The regulator regularly removes complying status from SMSFs due to breaches of laws and failing to lodge tax returns, and a non-complying fund is taxed at the highest marginal tax rate. The penalty taxes can be severe.

This is where the third way, super wraps, should have bolstered the retail and industry super funds’ positions. They should have identified their vulnerable clients and warned them that SMSFs are not for all, and sold super wraps as a stepping stone, a learning path, to becoming a trustee and taking full responsibility for managing one’s super. The most commonly cited reason for establishing an SMSF is to give control over investments, and for the majority, a super wrap does that. It’s self managed super without a separate trust.

In fact, super wraps are often mistaken for SMSFs. When AustralianSuper launched its Member Direct wrap, the 2 February 2012 edition of Investment Magazine ran the headline, “AustralianSuper provides SMSF services to members.” If large institutions marketed it properly, it’s not a super wrap, it’s a ‘Self Managed Super Account’. It’s the self managed super when a customer does not want the responsibility, administration burden and cost of becoming a trustee.

What’s the evidence that a decent proportion of SMSFs would consider a super wrap? At the 2012 ASFA Conference, consultants from Tria presented a session titled, “The Empire Strikes Back: can retail and industry funds provide a viable alternative to SMSFs?” After being asked why they had left a major fund and set up an SMSF, members were then asked, “If we had offered you a competitive SMSF solution, would you have stayed?” Nearly half the members said they were either ‘likely’ or ‘very likely’ to have stayed. Tria estimated retention could have been “perhaps a third or more of SMSF destined outflows.” And internal polling by a major stockbroker with a large SMSF client base showed about a quarter of existing SMSFs would not have set them up if they had known about the features of a super wrap.

Furthermore, 11% of SMSFs hold less than $100,000 in assets, and 22% less than $200,000. At these balances, the fixed costs of annual accountancy and administration expenses plus ASIC fees are a high percentage. It is on larger balances where SMSFs better justify their costs, because super wraps often have an administrative fee based on asset size.

Does the SMSF money find its way back to the major retail managers anyway? No. The ATO asset allocation statistics for December 2012 show the major classes are:

  • listed trusts  4.1%
  • unlisted trusts 9.1%
  • other managed investments 4.8%
  • cash and term deposits 28.6%
  • listed shares 31.6%
  • unlisted shares 1.1%
  • non-residential real property 11.4%
  • residential real property 3.5%

About 14% is invested in traditional managed funds. The big winners are the stockbrokers, the funding departments of banks and the real estate agents.

Obviously, a super wrap solution is not for everyone, as many can benefit from the complete investment flexibility of a genuine SMSF. But we are talking about a million SMSF trustees here - the majority hold blue chip shares, cash and term deposits in their SMSF, which could be done in a super wrap, often at a competitive cost and without the trustee and administrative burden. According to the ATO survey of SMSF trustees, the average amount of time per week spent managing an SMSF is 3.7 hours, or 4.2 hours in pension phase. That's a decent round of golf, or a morning relaxing on the beach.

Which would you prefer, and what's your time worth?


Simon Christopher
March 01, 2013

Love the Video!

Russell Medcraft
February 24, 2013

Well everyone is hopping on the bandwagon!!! Self managed super is exactly that- self managed. Investors in most cases like it because it gets them out of the grips of the large institutions.
We seem to be forgetting that!
The "best interest" test will sort out all the pricing debates and who should and should not have one.

Forget about the price point of $2,000 to $5,000
Watch this space for self directed investors winning back control and paying a lodgement fee and audit fee of $400.00 p.a. and having free online admin services.

Robert Adès
February 24, 2013

Great article, and hits the point exactly! Super Wraps are not for everyone, but neither are SMSF’s. For balances under $500k, SMSF’s will generally be more expensive and time consuming than a Super Wrap, yet offer no discernible advantage. The differentiators of holding direct property and other unlisted assets in super is really not an option until balances become much higher (>$1m). The relentless advice to open an SMSF (often when balances are as low as $300k) by service providers could be regarded as conflicted. Of course Super Wrap promoters could also be open to this criticism, albeit with a lower cost premium over (say) a pooled industry fund.

It comes down to utilisation. If a superannuation investor isn’t going to engage in direct property, etc., but wants control over a portfolio of usual listed assets plus a few managed funds, then a well priced Super Wrap is worth looking at. Industry fund solutions like Australian Super’s “Member Direct investment option” are worth looking at. It may be a stepping stone strategy on the way to an SMSF, but it may also be all most people need to have the control and investments they want within super. Passive investors who remain vanilla and “index-like” in their investment attitudes, who want diversification rather than committed concentration, should probably forget both SMSF’s and Super Wraps and stay with well-performing, well costed pooled funds. Being pressured by service providers and BBQ banter to buy something you don’t need is the worst outcome.

Geoff Walker
February 23, 2013

Sounds interesting, but "tell 'em the price, son"!

Graham Hand
February 23, 2013

Obviously, there are as many price variations as there are providers, and without naming names (because Cuffelinks prefers to be impartial), here's the price structure of one super wrap:

Annual administration fee $180
Brokerage fees for ASX/S&P300 stocks from 0.12%
Fund investment fees 0.09% for indexed diversified, 0.23% for Australian shares. Or buy a listed ETF.

Super wraps are not for everyone, but hard for small SMSFs with standard investments to beat.

Paul Meleng
February 22, 2013

This article is absolutely correct. So the interesting question is "why is it so?". The answer as always is that "someone is always selling something". In this case an easy $2000 a year in fees for mass produced back office accounting work administering an SMSF. Where I have seen accountants writing why their client should consider an SMSF, it seems always to compare it to the most expensive of old retail managed super funds, never to an Industry fund, a wholesale fund (like CFSFC Wholesale) and most certainly never mentions the capabilities of a modern wrap as mentioned here. They also assume that no investment advice will be required. There is a difference between "control" and blind faith.
Apart from the costs and facilities etc the article is spot on with regard to people taking on complexity at the wrong end of life. There will be many disasters to come as the first sign that dad is losing the plot will be uncharacteristic blunders of judgement with the family's wealth inside the SMSF. The very first step of the con man is to get the person to move to an SMSF so they have a cheque book in their trembling sweaty hand to "invest" with into their ponzi or scam or "optimistic" property scheme. Watch this space.........


Leave a Comment:



7 vital steps to compliance for your SMSF

Importance of updating your SMSF Trust Deed

Collectable and personal use assets in SMSFs


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 little-known pension traps prove the value of advice

Most people entering retirement do not see a financial adviser, mainly due to cost. It's a major problem because there are small mistakes a retiree can make which are expensive and avoidable if a few tips were known.

Check eligibility for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card

Eligibility for the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card has no asset test and a relatively high income test. It's worth checking eligibility and the benefits of qualifying to save on the cost of medications.

Hamish Douglass on why the movie hasn’t ended yet

The focus is on Magellan for its investment performance and departure of the CEO, but Douglass says the pandemic, inflation, rising rates and Middle East tensions have not played out. Vindication is always long term.

Start the year right with the 2022 Retiree Checklist

This is our annual checklist of what retirees need to be aware of in 2022. It is a long list of 25 items and not everything will apply to your situation. Run your eye over the benefits and entitlements.

At 98-years-old, Charlie Munger still delivers the one-liners

The Warren Buffett/Charlie Munger partnership is the stuff of legends, but even Charlie admits it is coming to an end ("I'm nearly dead"). He is one of the few people in investing prepared to say what he thinks.

Should I pay off the mortgage or top up my superannuation?

Depending on personal circumstances, it may be time to rethink the bias to paying down housing debt over wealth accumulation in super. Do the sums and ask these four questions to plan for your future.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Three ways index investing masks extra risk

There are thousands of different indexes, and they are not all diversified and broadly-based. Watch for concentration risk in sectors and companies, and know the underlying assets in case liquidity is needed.

Investment strategies

Will 2022 be the year for quality companies?

It is easy to feel like an investing genius over the last 10 years, with most asset classes making wonderful gains. But if there's a setback, companies like Reece, ARB, Cochlear, REA Group and CSL will recover best.


2022 outlook: buy a raincoat but don't put it on yet

In the 11th year of a bull market, near the end of the cycle, some type of correction is likely. Underneath is solid, healthy and underpinned by strong earnings growth, but there's less room for mistakes.


Time to give up on gold?

In 2021, the gold price failed to sustain its strong rise since 2018, although it recovered after early losses. But where does gold sit in a world of inflation, rising rates and a competitor like Bitcoin?

Investment strategies

Global leaders reveal surprises of 2021, challenges for 2022

In a sentence or two, global experts across many fields are asked to summarise the biggest surprise of 2021, and enduring challenges into 2022. It's a short and sweet view of the changes we are all facing.


2021 was a standout year for stockmarket listings

In 2021, sharemarket gains supported record levels of capital raisings and IPOs in Australia. The range of deals listed here shows the maturity of the local market in providing equity capital.


Let 'er rip: how high can debt-to-GDP ratios soar?

Governments and investors have been complacent about the build up of debt, but at some level, a ceiling exists. Are we near yet? Trouble is brewing, especially in the eurozone and emerging countries.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.