Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 204

Six months of Trump, thanks, but what about impeachment?

It has been six months since Donald Trump won the US presidential election. Contrary to the talk of doom and gloom from the usual line-up of shrill ‘experts’ in the media, share prices have done well since the election. The chart below shows the total returns from the major asset classes since 9 November 2016.

Click to enlarge

Global shares have risen well virtually across the board. Returns in hedged and un-hedged Aussie dollars have both been good as the AUD has remained little changed against most currencies. Japanese shares have been the stand-out, up 20%, and European markets have also seen double-digit returns, led by Germany. We remained committed to global shares in portfolios throughout the lead-up to the election and since. We also increased weightings of Australian shares shortly after the election and the market here has done well.

The Trump victory became clear only after the US market had closed on Tuesday 8 November, US time, but the Australian market was already open on our Wednesday 9th, so local investors here had to think for themselves. With no lead from the US, local investors panicked and sold shares down 2% across the board. But as soon as the US market opened strongly on its Wednesday 9th US time, local Aussie investors said: “Oops - we should have bought, not sold!”, and then our market jumped 3% on Thursday 10th. The local Aussie stock market rose with the rest of the world until the local banks retreated a little in May 2017 as fears of a housing bust set in.

On the other hand, the ‘defensive’ asset classes have done relatively poorly, but still positive. Within the defensive allocations, our portfolios have been skewed toward corporate bonds and floating rates, which have done better than government bonds. The worst of the scaremongers in November were advocating selling everything and retreating to gold, but gold sold off sharply after the election. We hold no gold in portfolios.

Of course, past returns provide no guarantees for the future, but it shows the value of keeping a cool head and sticking to a disciplined process. Markets have done well in the first six months under Trump but that does not mean this will continue. As always it pays to ignore the media noise and focus on the real drivers of markets over the long term.

 

Trump versus Nixon: impacts here

In recent weeks, many people have asked me about the possible impacts on markets of a Trump impeachment. Comparisons have been made to Nixon who resigned on 9 August 1974 to avoid being impeached over his involvement in, and cover-up of, the Watergate break-in on 17 March 1972 in the lead-up to the 1972 election.

The Nixon crisis in the US and the Whitlam crisis here both played out during the 1973-74 stock market crashes in the US and Australian markets. Here is a daily chart of the Australian All Ordinaries Index (green) and the Dow Jones Industrial Index of US shares (red) during 1972-75. I have re-based both to start at 100 at the start of 1972 to make the comparison easier. The chart also shows the main monetary policy indicators in both countries in that era – the yield on 10-year government bonds in Australia and the Fed’s discount rate in the US.

Click to enlarge

While the policy decisions of the Nixon and Whitlam administrations certainly influenced the direction of the crises, the tumultuous removals from office of Nixon in the US and Whitlam in Australia were not the main drivers of markets. The main issues were the battle against inflation (which peaked at 12.2% in the US and 17.6% in Australia), the trade-off with unemployment, and the severe credit squeezes in both countries. These factors triggered the deepest recessions and stock market sell-offs since the 1929 crash and the 1930s depression. Nixon and Whitlam contributed to the problems but the main causes of inflation in both countries lay in the sustained increases in government spending from the mid-1960s on social programmes and the Vietnam war, poor central bank responses to rising inflation and to the OPEC oil price hike, and worsening current account and currency imbalances.

Trump’s continued haphazard announcements, and possible moves to impeach him, are likely to rattle markets from time to time, but that is not the main game. Far more important issues include fiscal policy (government spending and debt), monetary policy responses to rising inflation (interest rates), company profits and cash-flows.

 

Ashley Owen is Chief Investment Officer at privately-owned advisory firm Stanford Brown and The Lunar Group. He is also a Director of Third Link Investment Managers, a fund that supports Australian charities. This article is general information that does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

  •   31 May 2017
  • 4
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

A reluctant investor’s guide to understanding bitcoin

The 2020 US presidential elections

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Latest Updates

Shares

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Superannuation

When you can withdraw your super

You can’t freely withdraw your super before 65. You need to meet certain legal conditions tied to your age, whether you’ve retired, or if you're using a transition to retirement option. 

Retirement

A national guide to concession entitlements

Navigating retirement concessions is unnecessarily complex. This outlines a new project to help older Australians find what they’re entitled to - quickly, clearly, and with less stress. 

Property

The psychology of REIT investing

Market shocks and rallies test every investor’s resolve. This explores practical strategies to stay grounded - resisting panic in downturns and FOMO in booms - while focusing on long-term returns. 

Fixed interest

Bonds are copping a bad rap

Bonds have had a tough few years and many investors are turning to other assets to diversify their portfolios. However, bonds can still play a valuable role as a source of income and risk mitigation.

Strategy

Is it time to fire the consultants?

The NSW government is cutting the use of consultants. Universities have also been criticized for relying on consultants as cover for restructuring plans. But are consultants really the problem they're made out to be?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.