Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 204

Six months of Trump, thanks, but what about impeachment?

It has been six months since Donald Trump won the US presidential election. Contrary to the talk of doom and gloom from the usual line-up of shrill ‘experts’ in the media, share prices have done well since the election. The chart below shows the total returns from the major asset classes since 9 November 2016.

Click to enlarge

Global shares have risen well virtually across the board. Returns in hedged and un-hedged Aussie dollars have both been good as the AUD has remained little changed against most currencies. Japanese shares have been the stand-out, up 20%, and European markets have also seen double-digit returns, led by Germany. We remained committed to global shares in portfolios throughout the lead-up to the election and since. We also increased weightings of Australian shares shortly after the election and the market here has done well.

The Trump victory became clear only after the US market had closed on Tuesday 8 November, US time, but the Australian market was already open on our Wednesday 9th, so local investors here had to think for themselves. With no lead from the US, local investors panicked and sold shares down 2% across the board. But as soon as the US market opened strongly on its Wednesday 9th US time, local Aussie investors said: “Oops - we should have bought, not sold!”, and then our market jumped 3% on Thursday 10th. The local Aussie stock market rose with the rest of the world until the local banks retreated a little in May 2017 as fears of a housing bust set in.

On the other hand, the ‘defensive’ asset classes have done relatively poorly, but still positive. Within the defensive allocations, our portfolios have been skewed toward corporate bonds and floating rates, which have done better than government bonds. The worst of the scaremongers in November were advocating selling everything and retreating to gold, but gold sold off sharply after the election. We hold no gold in portfolios.

Of course, past returns provide no guarantees for the future, but it shows the value of keeping a cool head and sticking to a disciplined process. Markets have done well in the first six months under Trump but that does not mean this will continue. As always it pays to ignore the media noise and focus on the real drivers of markets over the long term.

Trump versus Nixon: impacts here

In recent weeks, many people have asked me about the possible impacts on markets of a Trump impeachment. Comparisons have been made to Nixon who resigned on 9 August 1974 to avoid being impeached over his involvement in, and cover-up of, the Watergate break-in on 17 March 1972 in the lead-up to the 1972 election.

The Nixon crisis in the US and the Whitlam crisis here both played out during the 1973-74 stock market crashes in the US and Australian markets. Here is a daily chart of the Australian All Ordinaries Index (green) and the Dow Jones Industrial Index of US shares (red) during 1972-75. I have re-based both to start at 100 at the start of 1972 to make the comparison easier. The chart also shows the main monetary policy indicators in both countries in that era – the yield on 10-year government bonds in Australia and the Fed’s discount rate in the US.

Click to enlarge

While the policy decisions of the Nixon and Whitlam administrations certainly influenced the direction of the crises, the tumultuous removals from office of Nixon in the US and Whitlam in Australia were not the main drivers of markets. The main issues were the battle against inflation (which peaked at 12.2% in the US and 17.6% in Australia), the trade-off with unemployment, and the severe credit squeezes in both countries. These factors triggered the deepest recessions and stock market sell-offs since the 1929 crash and the 1930s depression. Nixon and Whitlam contributed to the problems but the main causes of inflation in both countries lay in the sustained increases in government spending from the mid-1960s on social programmes and the Vietnam war, poor central bank responses to rising inflation and to the OPEC oil price hike, and worsening current account and currency imbalances.

Trump’s continued haphazard announcements, and possible moves to impeach him, are likely to rattle markets from time to time, but that is not the main game. Far more important issues include fiscal policy (government spending and debt), monetary policy responses to rising inflation (interest rates), company profits and cash-flows.

 

Ashley Owen is Chief Investment Officer at privately-owned advisory firm Stanford Brown and The Lunar Group. He is also a Director of Third Link Investment Managers, a fund that supports Australian charities. This article is general information that does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

RELATED ARTICLES

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

A reluctant investor’s guide to understanding bitcoin

The 2020 US presidential elections

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.