Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 596

The case for Australian AI

Australia needs a sovereign artificial intelligence (AI) capability. It must be developed in Australia and built on Australian data. It must be AI for Australian questions and Australian problems. It needs to embody Australia’s values, geography, and economy. Downloading a foreign model and fine-tuning it undermines our economic future, because it doesn’t build Australian capability. If Australia is to control its own destiny in an AI-enabled future, it must build its own infrastructure, not rent it from overseas. Creating an Australian AI capability is the first critical step in the long process of building Australia’s AI economy. Having Australian capability will develop exactly the skills, experience, and capability in AI that Australia needs to drive its transition to an AI-enabled economy and set us up to build a better one.

Background

AI is the technology of our time. It has changed the global economy permanently, yet its primary impact is yet to come. Businesses that engage in the transformation will improve their productivity and out-compete those that don’t. The larger opportunity that AI offers, however, is to develop entirely new business models.

Various economic reports put the potential value of AI to the Australian economy over the next decade at more than $300 billion. AI is not an emerging technology, or about to descend through the downside of the hype cycle. It is creating far too much economic value right now for that.

Uber, Google, Facebook and TikTok used AI to build global business models that have changed the Australian economy permanently. AI-enabled global businesses will continue to outcompete existing industries over the coming decades. The Australian tax base will shrink, and Australian productivity will continue to decline, unless we compete. This comes at a time when our economic complexity is shrinking, and our population is ageing. We need Australian businesses that use AI to address new global markets if we are to maintain our GDP per capita, let alone grow it.

Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are a critical tool for existing companies and startups that want to develop AI-enabled business models. As a result, they have become critical infrastructure for nations wanting to make the transition to the AI-enabled economy. Australia needs AI that reflects its culture, data, and values if it wants to retain economic and cultural sovereignty. The countries we compare ourselves against have already made this step.

AI and global markets

The five largest companies in the world are AI companies. The revenue of the smallest of the five (Amazon) would see it placed at number 25 in the list of nations ranked by GDP. This puts it above 152 countries including Ireland (population 5 million), Norway (population 5 million) and Austria (population 9 million). Amazon has 1.2 million employees, slightly smaller than the population of Adelaide. AI is driving unprecedented value creation globally and will continue to do so.

The founders of Google didn’t inherit a small Internet search engine and make incremental improvements. Larry Page and Sergey Brin were doing PhDs at Stanford and realised that Internet search could be framed as a matrix inversion problem. They started an Internet search engine on this basis, and it was better than its competitors. This meant they attracted more traffic, which gave them more data, which allowed them to improve their algorithm further. Before long they had an insurmountable advantage in search, which they leveraged into online advertising. It is critical to their model that each additional search customer, and each additional advertisement, have almost zero marginal cost to the business. The accuracy and scalability of the model undermined the viability of classified advertising globally, and thus the business model of most newspapers. It had a similar impact on television.

The founders of Uber realised that there was a misalignment of interests between taxi drivers and passengers, and a lot of unused capacity in privately-owned vehicles. They used AI to enable drivers and passengers to connect and undermined the taxi industry’s business model as a result. The taxi drivers were protected by legislation, and by the physically and geographically focussed nature of their business. The value of a taxi licence is now less than 10% of what it was pre-Uber. Uber make 30% of every transaction and have almost zero marginal cost.

The challenge for many incumbent businesses is whether they want to be Uber, or Uber drivers.

Value proposition

The value in AI is not chatbots. The value is in the fact that AI enables existing business problems to be solved with far less training data, and far more quickly, than has been possible previously. It has thus removed the moat that many existing businesses depend upon. The truly disruptive value in AI is that it enables solving new problems that would have been considered impossible previously. Some of these new solutions enable global businesses. This is a great opportunity for Australia to transition to a more complex, productive, and modern economy.

Australians need to be able to use AI without sending data to foreign countries or companies, and without leaking IP. More than this, building Australia’s sovereign AI capability is the first step towards joining the modern global AI-enabled economy. If Australia does not develop its own capability, it will perpetually need to download this critical infrastructure from overseas. In developing our own infrastructure, we build the skills and experience required to create AI-enabled global businesses in Australia.

 

Professor Anton van den Hengel is the founding Director of The Australian Institute for Machine Learning, a Chief Investigator of the Australian Centre of Excellence in Robotic Vision, and a Professor of Computer Science at the University of Adelaide.

 

  •   29 January 2025
  • 3
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Active managers: Bringing a gun to the gunfight

Don’t underestimate Australia

Shares rebound on hopes of war ending, but stalemate the likely outcome

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.