Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 623

Is the iPhone nearing its Blackberry moment?

Apple was a serial winner over the past 15 years as personal computing transitioned from desktops to smartphones. In the 2010s, the iPhone built a large user base through the seamless integration of iOS with great hardware design to offer users unique, intuitive and arguably superior computing experiences. Examples included:

  • first to market with multi-touch input on large capacitive touch screens
  • in-sourcing chip design to deliver best-in-class performance and battery life
  • seamless cross device compatibility through features such as Handoff and AirPlay, and peripherals like the Watch and AirPods.

For much of the past decade, the iPhone was synonymous with the marketing tagline “it just works”.

In the past five years the smartphone market matured, phone designs converged and competitors arguably surpassed the iPhone’s hardware. As these dynamics changed, Apple increasingly relied on the iOS platform to extract value from their business in a similar fashion to many of the demand side aggregation businesses we've written about.

On the users’ side, iOS is the main way Apple lock in their one billion+ user base. Users are reluctant to switch due to inertia, the need to repurchase apps and port across contacts, photos and personal data. Apple monetises these high value users by being the ‘toll road’ for apps and service providers (see Figure 1). Google paying Apple $20 billion a year to be the default search engine exemplified Apple’s market power.

With the rise of ChatGPT and other AI services, the prevailing market narrative assumes the status quo - AI will be another category of apps and services. Apple will be an ‘AI winner’ as the iOS platform remains the primary toll road for AI services to access high value users (see Figure 1). This view is the one likely held at Apple’s Cupertino headquarters. Apple has under-invested in Apple Intelligence and is increasingly reliant on external partnerships like ChatGPT for AI functionality.

Although we remain cautious about the AI promise, ‘AI agents’ - where AI interprets and executes tasks autonomously for a user - could be the next evolution in device interactions. Rather than relying on touchscreen inputs, the interactions happen through the AI agent autonomously or via voice. Today, this could be simple tasks such as drafting emails or scheduling meetings. But in five years’ time, AI agents could book our hotel or buy toilet paper every two weeks.

In this scenario Apple’s market power could weaken materially over the medium term. On the users’ side, iOS’ lock-in effects could weaken as agentic AI interactions increase, and touchscreen inputs decrease. There will be a tipping point.

Users will accept the high switching costs of changing their operating system in pursuit of a superior and capable agentic AI experience as the value of the latter meaningfully outweighs the costs of the former.

On the apps and services side, it’s likely native integration between them and AI services is on the roadmap. There’s strong incentive to do so, firstly, to create a seamless and integrated agentic AI experience for users, and secondly, to create new hardware-agnostic distribution channels, bypassing the iOS toll road (see middle column in Figure 2).

The existential risk for Apple is that agentic AI evolves into the new operating system for the next generation of hardware which do not require touchscreens (e.g. Meta’s Orion or Xiaomi’s AI glasses). If this happens, the iOS and iPhone will be suddenly obsolete and Apple another commoditised tech hardware provider.

One only needs to remember Blackberry clinging on to the superiority of their keyboards at the beginning of the touchscreen era to see the disintermediating effects of interface changes. The right column in Figure 2 shows how the value chain could evolve long term.

Given these potential outcomes, Apple’s relationship with ChatGPT could be them welcoming a large wooden horse through the gates of Troy.

We think Apple must develop and control their own leading edge agentic AI models, deploy them in iOS and natively integrate them with apps and services providers as quickly as possible. Doing so is expensive - xAI is reportedly burning $1 billion a month and Meta is spending $72 billion this year on capex. Yet Apple, which generates around $100 billion annually in free cash flow, is one of the few companies with the resources to do it.

The next platform shift?

Computing witnessed three major platform shifts in the past 50 years.

  • In the 1980s from mainframes to desktop PCs.
  • In the 2000s from desktop PCs to desktop internet.
  • In the 2010s from desktop internet to smartphones – a platform shift which Apple led.

Each transition reshaped the industry and redistributed profit pools. Leadership in the sector changed as incumbents were slow to adapt. The question becomes: Is Apple ready for the next great platform shift?

 

Jimmy Su is Portfolio Manager of Platinum’s International Technology Fund. Platinum Asset Management is a sponsor of Firstlinks. The Platinum International Technology Fund currently does not have long or short positions in Apple.

The above information is commentary only (i.e. our general thoughts). It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, investment advice. To the extent permitted by law, no liability is accepted for any loss or damage as a result of any reliance on this information. Before making any investment decision you need to consider (with your financial adviser) your particular investment needs, objectives and circumstances.

For more articles and papers by Platinum click here.

 

  •   6 August 2025
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Have Apple and Google reached the beginning of the end?

It's time small and mid-caps play catchup

Reports of tech's death are greatly exaggerated

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Why I dislike dividend stocks

If you need income then buying dividend stocks makes perfect sense. But if you don’t then it makes little sense because it’s likely to limit building real wealth. Here’s what you should do instead.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

Retirement

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

The ASX is full of broken blue chips

Investing in the ASX 20 or 200 requires vigilance. Blue chips aren’t immune to failure, and the old belief that you can simply hold them forever is outdated. 

Shares

Buying Guzman Y Gomez, and not just for the burritos

Adding high-quality compounders at attractive valuations is difficult in an efficient market. However, during the volatile FY25 reporting season, an opportunity arose to increase a position in Mexican fast-food chain GYG.

Investment strategies

Factor investing and how to use ETFs to your advantage

Factor-based ETFs are bridging the gap between active and passive investing, giving investors low-cost access to proven drivers of long-term returns such as quality, value, momentum and dividend yield. 

Strategy

Engineers vs lawyers: the US-China divide that will shape this century

In Breakneck, Dan Wang contrasts China’s “engineering state” with America’s “lawyerly society,” showing how these mindsets drive innovation, dysfunction, and reshape global power amid rising rivalry. 

Retirement

18 rules for ageing well

The rules to age successfully include, 'the unexamined life lasts longer', 'change no more than one-eighth of your life at a time', 'nobody is thinking about you', and 'pursue virtue but don’t sweat it'.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.