Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 199

The meaning of life and real estate portfolio construction

When constructing a real estate portfolio, you will frequently be confronted with the tricky question: which property should I acquire (or dispose of) next? What I’ve discovered over the course of my investment career is that this is not so much a tricky question as it is a trick question. It’s akin to someone asking you: “What is the meaning of life?”

What started as a straightforward question didn’t seem so straightforward after all …

Chess and complexity

Allow me to digress. Recently my son has taken an interest in chess, so in trying to avoid the embarrassment of regular defeat to a seven-year-old, I’ve begun to immerse myself in a game I know little about.

There are about 10^50 potential combinations on a chess board, a number so astronomical that it’s equal to about 60% of the sum total of atoms in the known universe. So, chess combinations are a plausible proxy for the complexity of the real world, though the latter is indubitably more complex still.

Fitting therefore that Victor Frankl, a Viennese Holocaust survivor and psychiatrist, makes use of the chess analogy in his brief but brilliant book: Man’s Search for Meaning. Frankl argues that asking someone “What is the meaning of life?” is akin to asking a chess grand master “What is the best move I can make in chess?” This is self-evidently a nonsensical question: the grand master will respond by asking for the position of the various pieces on the chess board.

And since every human life is a unique combination of genetics and the “thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to”, the question should be, “What is the meaning of life for me in this situation?”

The answer will vary considerably from one person to the next. Which is why awe-inspiring meaning for one person may seem redundant, distasteful or outrageous to another.

The fanatics among us will no doubt be dismayed. For them, there is always one right answer and it conveniently applies to all, no exceptions. Black and white answers for a world of infinite shades. “The whole problem with the world”, Bertrand Russell once observed, “is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wise people so full of doubts.”

Enough digression. What does all this have to do with the arcane art of real estate portfolio construction? Answer: it’s far less interesting than the meaning of life but the principles are the same.

Recently, I was asked by a cashed-up overseas private investor what I would recommend as a real estate investment strategy in the current market. I responded by saying that anyone who provided an immediate and authoritative answer to that question should be treated with extreme suspicion. They were likely either a fanatic or a fraud.

Ask some fundamental questions

First, I needed to know where all the pieces were on his chess board. I said I would need to ask him some fundamental questions before I could even begin to answer his question (11 questions overall, but who’s counting?):

  1. What is the quantum he is looking to invest and how quickly?
  2. What is the term of investment? Are there any hard limits on the term or is there some flexibility?
  3. What is the target rate of return? Is there a minimum return requirement?
  4. What is the tolerance to annual volatility in returns or to negative returns?
  5. What are the likely liquidity requirements over the term of investment? Is there a minimum annual distribution requirement?
  6. Does he currently own any real estate in Australia or overseas? If so, what is the current and historic performance of that portfolio?
  7. Does he have any preference or expertise or contacts in a particular sector of the real estate market, such as logistics or office or shopping centres?

A zealot will peddle the same deal to all regardless of circumstance, but the right answer is unique to each investor.

Next time someone asks you what real estate deal you would recommend they invest in – smile, lean in and whisper with a hint of irony: “So, pray tell me, what is the meaning of life?”

 

Adam Geha is CEO and Founding Director of real estate fund manager EG. The original article is here. This article is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

RELATED ARTICLES

Tax reform favours apartments and owner-occupiers

Six warning bells against property spruikers

Negative gearing doubts and ATO watches home purchasers

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.