Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 199

Unpacking the '30-year bull market' in bonds

The financial press regularly quotes someone referring to 'the 30-year bull market in bonds'. Often, they’re reporting the latest prediction that this amazing period of (alleged) bond market prosperity is about to come to a crashing end. This article reviews the history of bond yields, prices and returns to explain what the bond market has really done for the past few decades. This can help to understand what various future scenarios might actually mean.

The problem with characterising the past 30 years or so as a 'bull market in bonds' is that it’s not an accurate depiction. Reality simply doesn’t support the statement.

Always worth par on maturity

Most commentators speak of the long-run trend in US bond yields when they refer to the 30-year bull market. The following chart (courtesy of Macrotrends) gives a 54-year history of 10-year US Treasury bond yields.

Bond yields were at an all-time peak 36 years ago and have in recent years been at all-time lows. (The peak was in 1981 and the low point in 2012.) Commentators naively infer that bond prices must, therefore, be a lot higher because when yields fall, prices rise. Ipso facto, we’ve had a multi-decade bull market in bonds!

However, it’s wrong to simplistically turn a long-term change in yields into an on-going bull market. A simple question will help you understand why it’s not possible: when it matures next month, what will be the price of the May 2017 US Treasury bond that was issued in 1987 at par value of $100? If there’s been a 30-year bull market then surely this bond is now worth thousands of dollars.

That’s not the case. There are few things you can predict with confidence in financial markets, but that the May 2017 Treasury bond will mature at exactly $100 is certain. The following chart, courtesy of Bloomberg, shows the full history of the price of the May 2017 Treasury bond since its issue in 1987.

The price of this bond did increase early in its life, peaking at just under $150 value in 2003. So, you could say that there was a bull market over its first 16 years, albeit with some rather large ‘corrections’ in 1994 and 1999. There was then a clear bear market from 2003 to 2006 and overall the period from 1998 until 2012 looks more like a range trade in the $130-145 region. Since 2011 the bond’s price has been in rapid descent to the current level of just under $101. The remaining $1 above par will be discarded by the market over the next couple of weeks and it will pay holders at maturity the same $100 at which it was issued 30 years ago.

Since the definition of a bull market is a persistent increase in asset prices, the May 2017 US Treasury bond has not been in one for at least the past 14 years. This is especially so if you consider real, or inflation-adjusted prices. $100 is not worth as much in 2017 as it was back in 1987. Furthermore, the same could be said of every bond that has matured during the last 10, 20 or 30 years. They’ve all matured at par value. Not one bond has paid investors an inflated price. If that’s a bull, then I wouldn’t bother entering it in the Royal Easter Show!

More subdued over time

Now, let’s combine the trend in yields and prices to the history of bond market returns since the early 1980s. What we find is that the years of great returns are front loaded. There was a bull market in bonds at one time, but it was in the early years of this 30-year period. Since then, returns have been more subdued over time:

 

 

  • During the mid to late 1980s, rolling five-year returns from the US Treasury market were often above 15% pa and always in double digits.

 

  • By the 1990s, things had changed and returns were running in the 7.5–10% region.

 

  • Since the late 1990s, rolling five-year bond returns have been closer to 5% pa and, over the past half dozen years or so, investors have received in the region of 2-3% pa.

 

Astute readers will compare these return outcomes with the 10-year yield chart and notice something remarkable. When yields were high, so were returns! However, as yields declined, although initially this gave a boost to total returns, ultimately it resulted in lower returns.

Does that sound like a long-term bull market? Owners of bonds have made good returns in the past 30 to 36 years. But it’s been from the yields they’ve been paid, not from any long-lasting capital price appreciation.

What next for bond returns?

The long-run trend in declining yields appears to have ended about five years ago. Since then we’ve had two small ‘bear markets’, during the taper tantrum in 2013 and in response to stronger growth expectations in 2016. The latter has petered out, with Treasury yields back to the low end of their post-election range.

But what if we are in for a period of rising bond yields? If that happens, then investors with long-duration investments will experience potentially significant negative returns for a time. However, a sustained rise in bond yields will gradually result in rising bond returns in exactly the same way as the historical trend has been for falling yields to gradually reduce returns.

And along the way, whatever bond prices do in 2017 or any other year, every bond will pay back its par value at maturity (assuming no defaults). Never let the scaremongers divert your thinking from the simple mathematical reality of how bond markets behave.

 

Warren Bird is Executive Director of Uniting Financial Services, a division of the Uniting Church (NSW & ACT). He has 30 years’ experience in fixed income investing. He also serves as an Independent Member of the GESB Investment Committee.

  •   27 April 2017
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

A journey through the life of a fixed rate bond

Things may finally be turning for the bond market

Stars align for fixed income

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Latest Updates

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Latest from Morningstar

Does an American retirement rule work for Australians?

The 4% rule has survived decades of scrutiny, but Australia's retirement system changes the equation in ways most overlook. Before accepting or rejecting this rule of thumb, it pays to understand what really drives retirement outcomes.

Shares

Glencore lands on the ASX. Should BHP and Rio shareholders switch?

A coal-heavy miner with governance concerns isn't the obvious choice for investors. Yet, Glencore's ASX listing may offer something BHP and Rio can't. The challenge is working out whether the opportunity outweighs the risks.

Why does the system treat capital gains and losses differently?

Investors are often told not to let tax policy drive their investment decisions. Yet, under the new CGT rules, portfolio construction, volatility and even how assets are owned may have an outsized impact on their final outcome.

Economy

Three common sense reforms that Australia needs

What do frozen bank accounts, mortgage traps and pension penalties have in common? They're all symptoms of a system that makes life much harder. Yet the obvious solutions seem to have escaped the attention of Canberra.

Shares

The hidden cost of government debt for investors

Some of the important effects of rising public debt never make the headlines. Research shows the immediate effects may already be unfolding, influencing corporate behaviour in ways that many investors would never suspect.

Investment strategies

When do fundamentals matter?

Is fundamental investing losing its grip on markets? Investors continue to search for valuation-based explanations for every price move, but the dominant force behind short-term returns may be something else altogether.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.