Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 330

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 330

The superannuation industry is its own worst enemy. The disagreements spill into the public domain and reduce confidence and trust in the system. Research released this week by Qantas Super shows only 60% of Australians (and worse, only 52% of those in the critical savings years of 40 to 49 years old) trust their super fund to act in their best interests. Confidence in having enough money in retirement languishes at an average score of 5.4 out of 10. Qantas Super CEO Michael Clancy said:

"The 2019 Melbourne Mercer Global Pensions Index has rated the Australian retirement system as the third best in the world so there is a disconnect between the performance of the industry and how members feel ... by better educating members on the improvements they've achieved and the relative strengths of the Australian super system, funds could improve their members' retirement confidence."

It's far more than the ongoing industry fund versus retail fund stoush. Six leading figures have weighed into the super debate again in recent days, including:

  • Finance Minister Mathias Cormann admitted people were sick of politicians "tinkering" with superannuation, and the Retirement Income Review "will not lead to any change". It will simply inform the public on how the super system operates.
  • Senator Jane Hume, Assistant Minister for Superannuation and Financial Services, said the superannuation system was "beleaguered by disengagement and opacity" and government has a moral obligation to make the system as efficient as possible.
  • Bill Kelty, the union executive credited for initiating the current super system, said former Treasurer Wayne Swan was a "miserable bastard" for only increasing the super guarantee (SG) by 0.5% during the Rudd-Gillard years. Kelty and Paul Keating would "go to their grave" fighting for the 12% SG.

  • Innes Willox, CEO of the Australian Industry Group, said the legislated 2.5% increase in SG to 12% needed to be weighed up against the cost to business before implementation.

  • Paul Keating said, "Willox is kidding us ... Superannuation has revolutionised Australia. It is the greatest reform to capital markets in the history of the country. Only a government of indecipherable recklessness would upend or damage such a system."

  • Former Treasurer Peter Costello told a Citibank Conference that compulsory superannuation had failed because "there was not a lot of thought given to how it would be managed once it was in these funds and how it would come out ... We realise that fees were extraordinarily high, some of the products were no good, and at the end of all this, when you get your entitlement, there's still this huge gap as to 'what do I do now?'"

With such strong positions and vested interests, it's difficult to have an informed debate. An example is the Government ruling out the Retirement Income Review considering the exclusion of homes from the age pension assets test. A reader explains why it is inequitable, and Anthony Asher shows how it might work. To give your view, take our quick one-question poll on this sensitive policy change.

Also in this week's edition ...

Carol Geremia is President of a wealth management business managing US$450 billion worldwide, and in our popular Interview Series, she explains what she sees as the biggest misalignments in the industry. This week's White Paper follows a two-year study on how her business decided to change the way it reports performance.

Australian investors increasingly accept the need to find assets overseas, and Joe Magyer shows how a domestic focus leads to a portfolio concentrated in less-attractive sectors.

It's a question every person either in or facing retirement asks, and while there's no one correct answer, Graeme Colley asks how much superannuation you might need. On a related subject, Craig Racine describes three issues he is hoping the Retirement Income Review will address to improve retiree understanding of the risks they are taking.

CBA shareholders and holders of hybrids should all have received an offer to invest in the newest hybrid, with a deadline to accept of 8 November 2019. Adam Fleck and Shaun Ler offer their views, plus they check the maturities and relative merits of other hybrids.

The exciting potential of 5G technology will soon capture us all, and John Malloy looks at the investment opportunities and the markets where opportunities are underappreciated.

And Jonathan Rochford gives his monthly update on the sometimes quirky, revealing and unusual media links you may otherwise miss.

Don't forget our quick poll on including homes in the age pension assets test.

 

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

How much super is enough?

We cannot see into the future, but here are some general guidelines on how much to save in super, and then how much you can spend to enjoy a good retirement. Start as soon as possible.

How to include homes in the age pension assets test

A reader speaks out about the inequity of ignoring own homes in the assets test for the age pension, plus a proposal on how it could work politically. Take our survey on the merit of the policy. 

OK Boomer: fessing up that we’ve had it good

The pre-Boomer generations faced global wars and depressions, but Australians born after 1946 have enjoyed prosperity. Superannuation, education, strong markets and surging property prices locked in gains.  

Four reasons to engage a financial adviser

The value of financial advice is increasingly questioned after the Royal Commission and changes to advice business models, but the case for financial advice for many people remains strong.

Reader poll on the home in pension assets test

Two-thirds of the responses to our reader poll say the family home should be included in some way in the age pension assets test, but the comments show it is an emotional and divisive subject. 

Focus on quality yield, not near-term income

Many investors are tempted by high yields on shares, but when they are not sustainable, and in weak businesses, the outcome is disappointing compared with better quality and lower yields. 

Latest Updates

Retirement

OK Boomer: fessing up that we’ve had it good

The pre-Boomer generations faced global wars and depressions, but Australians born after 1946 have enjoyed prosperity. Superannuation, education, strong markets and surging property prices locked in gains.  

Investment strategies

Young women are investing more in shares

Young woment are showing increasing confidence in the sharemarket, promising a better future than the Boomers and Gen X women who hold significantly less assets than males of their generation.  

Investment strategies

Shorting deserves more respect

A fund manager that can short sell stocks with weak investment characteristics while reinvesting the proceeds in long positions in preferred stocks has a high degree of flexibility.

Economy

Policymakers fear cutting stimulus can lead to recession

Prolonging a recovery with stimulus could lead to a worse slump later. Even today, policymakers are haunted by actions taken in 1937 which led to a loss of production and jobs and a falling GDP.

Shares

Bank reporting season scorecard for FY19

Our annual scorecard for Australian banks shows earnings were hit by remediation costs and slow credit growth, but they are in good health and look attractive versus other listed companies. 

Sponsors

Alliances

Special eBooks

Specially-selected collections of the best articles 

Read more

Earn CPD Hours

Accredited CPD hours reading Firstlinks

Read more

Pandora Archive

Firstlinks articles are collected in Pandora, Australia's national archive.

Read more