Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 330

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 330

The superannuation industry is its own worst enemy. The disagreements spill into the public domain and reduce confidence and trust in the system. Research released this week by Qantas Super shows only 60% of Australians (and worse, only 52% of those in the critical savings years of 40 to 49 years old) trust their super fund to act in their best interests. Confidence in having enough money in retirement languishes at an average score of 5.4 out of 10. Qantas Super CEO Michael Clancy said:

"The 2019 Melbourne Mercer Global Pensions Index has rated the Australian retirement system as the third best in the world so there is a disconnect between the performance of the industry and how members feel ... by better educating members on the improvements they've achieved and the relative strengths of the Australian super system, funds could improve their members' retirement confidence."

It's far more than the ongoing industry fund versus retail fund stoush. Six leading figures have weighed into the super debate again in recent days, including:

  • Finance Minister Mathias Cormann admitted people were sick of politicians "tinkering" with superannuation, and the Retirement Income Review "will not lead to any change". It will simply inform the public on how the super system operates.
  • Senator Jane Hume, Assistant Minister for Superannuation and Financial Services, said the superannuation system was "beleaguered by disengagement and opacity" and government has a moral obligation to make the system as efficient as possible.
  • Bill Kelty, the union executive credited for initiating the current super system, said former Treasurer Wayne Swan was a "miserable bastard" for only increasing the super guarantee (SG) by 0.5% during the Rudd-Gillard years. Kelty and Paul Keating would "go to their grave" fighting for the 12% SG.

  • Innes Willox, CEO of the Australian Industry Group, said the legislated 2.5% increase in SG to 12% needed to be weighed up against the cost to business before implementation.

  • Paul Keating said, "Willox is kidding us ... Superannuation has revolutionised Australia. It is the greatest reform to capital markets in the history of the country. Only a government of indecipherable recklessness would upend or damage such a system."

  • Former Treasurer Peter Costello told a Citibank Conference that compulsory superannuation had failed because "there was not a lot of thought given to how it would be managed once it was in these funds and how it would come out ... We realise that fees were extraordinarily high, some of the products were no good, and at the end of all this, when you get your entitlement, there's still this huge gap as to 'what do I do now?'"

With such strong positions and vested interests, it's difficult to have an informed debate. An example is the Government ruling out the Retirement Income Review considering the exclusion of homes from the age pension assets test. A reader explains why it is inequitable, and Anthony Asher shows how it might work. To give your view, take our quick one-question poll on this sensitive policy change.

Also in this week's edition ...

Carol Geremia is President of a wealth management business managing US$450 billion worldwide, and in our popular Interview Series, she explains what she sees as the biggest misalignments in the industry. This week's White Paper follows a two-year study on how her business decided to change the way it reports performance.

Australian investors increasingly accept the need to find assets overseas, and Joe Magyer shows how a domestic focus leads to a portfolio concentrated in less-attractive sectors.

It's a question every person either in or facing retirement asks, and while there's no one correct answer, Graeme Colley asks how much superannuation you might need. On a related subject, Craig Racine describes three issues he is hoping the Retirement Income Review will address to improve retiree understanding of the risks they are taking.

CBA shareholders and holders of hybrids should all have received an offer to invest in the newest hybrid, with a deadline to accept of 8 November 2019. Adam Fleck and Shaun Ler offer their views, plus they check the maturities and relative merits of other hybrids.

The exciting potential of 5G technology will soon capture us all, and John Malloy looks at the investment opportunities and the markets where opportunities are underappreciated.

And Jonathan Rochford gives his monthly update on the sometimes quirky, revealing and unusual media links you may otherwise miss.

Don't forget our quick poll on including homes in the age pension assets test.


Graham Hand, Managing Editor

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.



Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.