Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 589

Where is peak ETF?

The market share of ETFs and index trackers keeps rising and with it concerns about reduced market efficiency. In theory, if everyone would simply track an index, new information would no longer be reflected in share prices, and it would become highly profitable to be active and short stocks with negative news flow while buying stocks with positive news flow. This theoretical argument shows that there should be an equilibrium between index funds and active investors or that markets stop working. But where that equilibrium is, is anyone’s guess.

If we look at the latest figures from the Investment Company Institute about ETF market share in different countries (note this is across stocks, bonds, real estate, and commodities, so the numbers are lower than equity markets alone) we can see that in Anglo-Saxon countries, ETFs and index trackers typically have a much higher share than in continental Europe. Japan and South Korea seem to follow more the US and UK example, which is why we should consider Germany, France, or Switzerland outliers (there is a future post in that statistic somewhere).

Market share of ETFs across all major asset classes

Source: ICI, The Investment Association

The question is whether the market share of 15-25% reached by index trackers today is the peak. I doubt it and I expect index trackers to continue to gain share for many years to come.

But there are also increasing signs that with the rising share of index trackers, markets are becoming less efficient, particularly in the large-cap space.

Theresa Hambacher reviewed the last 20 years of research on index funds to see if index funds really reduce market efficiency and if active managers can drive markets back toward efficiency if too many investors switch to index trackers.

Her literature review concludes that the majority of studies show that the rise of index investing creates an ‘index inclusion effect’. Historically, this index inclusion effect meant a price jump in stocks that are newly included in an index and a drop for stocks that are excluded. But this price impact has declined significantly and all but disappeared in the US.

Nowadays, the index inclusion effect is more related to other metrics, most notably an increase in liquidity in stocks in an index. With this increase in liquidity also comes an increase in investor attention and a somewhat higher valuation. The increase in investor attention leads to higher institutional ownership, higher analyst coverage, and increased media coverage. But it also has other, more material effects. Most notably, increased liquidity and higher valuations reduce the cost of capital for both debt and equity capital and thus give index constituents an advantage over smaller stocks that are not part of the index.

On the other hand, there is ample evidence that market efficiency and price discovery decline if index funds capture a larger share of the market. This should in principle give an opening for active managers, who on average increase price efficiency and take advantage of market mispricing.

The reality, however, is more complex. Market efficiency is driven by a whole lot of factors, not just the share of index funds. This means that if active funds capture market inefficiencies and make markets more efficient, this does not drive investors away from index funds. Instead, markets may adjust in such a way as to become more efficient without reducing the market share of index funds. Plus, market efficiency is not the only driver of index fund market share. Hence, active funds may outperform index funds and improve market efficiency but get no reward in the form of higher market share. Instead, index fund investors may simply free-ride on the work of active fund managers.

These two effects are not new. They have been known for some time. But taken together they imply that the market share for index trackers may well increase past the optimal level and stay there for many, many years. And there seems very little if anything that active managers can do to reverse that. Hence, we do not know where peak ETF is, and while active managers provide a valuable service in making markets more efficient, they are not necessarily rewarded for it by capturing a larger share of investor assets.

 

Joachim Klement is an investment strategist based in London. This article contains the opinion of the author. As such, it should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of the author’s employer. Republished with permission from Klement on Investing.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Are markets broken?

The challenges of building a lazy portfolio

The challenges with building a dividend portfolio

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 606 with weekend update

The boss of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, UniSuper’s John Pearce, says Trump has declared an economic war and he’ll be reducing his US stock exposure over time. Should you follow suit?

  • 10 April 2025

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

An enlightened dividend path

While many chase high yields, true investment power lies in companies that steadily grow dividends. This strategy, rooted in patience and discipline, quietly compounds wealth and anchors investors through market turbulence.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Investment strategies

Does dividend investing make sense?

Dividend investing offers steady income and behavioral benefits, but its effectiveness depends on goals, market conditions, and fundamentals - especially in retirement, where it may limit full use of savings.

Economics

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

Strategy

Ageing in spurts

Fascinating initial studies suggest that while we age continuously in years, our bodies age, not at a uniform rate, but in spurts at around ages 44 and 60.

Interviews

Platinum's new international funds boss shifts gears

Portfolio Manager Ted Alexander outlines the changes that he's made to Platinum's International Fund portfolio since taking charge in March, while staying true to its contrarian, value-focused roots.

Investment strategies

Four ways to capitalise on a forgotten investing megatrend

The Trump administration has not killed the multi-decade investment opportunity in decarbonisation. These four industries in particular face a step-change in demand and could reward long-term investors.

Strategy

How the election polls got it so wrong

The recent federal election outcome has puzzled many, with Labor's significant win despite a modest primary vote share. Preference flows played a crucial role, highlighting the complexity of forecasting electoral results.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.