Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 365

Will value stocks benefit from the market's inflection point?

Two dominant investment styles are value versus growth. Value investors look for undervalued stocks while growth investors prefer companies with strong earnings growth potential. While value investing has outperformed over the long term, its underperformance in recent years, particularly in the recent selloff, has caused many to question when the promised value recovery will occur.

To shed some light on this, it is helpful to understand when value has outperformed in the past and the market conditions that led to this.

Where are the value stocks?

Value stocks are typically found in the more cyclical parts of the market such as the Financials, Resources and Consumer Discretionary sectors. These stocks are more sensitive to broader economic conditions, compared to defensive sectors such as Healthcare, Utilities, and Consumer Staples.

Value stocks tend to outperform when economic conditions are improving. In such an environment, the earnings growth outlook from the cyclical parts of the market improves relative to defensive sectors. This drives a rotation out of defensives and into cyclicals, leading to a period of relative outperformance by value.

The second point is that value stocks typically perform better in a rising interest rate environment. This is the result of two factors.

Firstly, rising interest rates usually correspond with improving economic conditions, which as mentioned above, generally favours value.

Secondly, rising interest rates increase the discount rate applied to future earnings and in general, ‘growthier’ stocks are more impacted as a greater proportion of their valuation is based on long-term future earnings. Therefore, a higher discount rate has a bigger impact on the valuation of growth stocks than it does on value stocks, which are more driven by nearer-term earnings and dividends.

In light of this, it’s easy to see why the past few years have been difficult for value investing, as global economic growth has been patchy, and we have been in a lower for longer interest rate environment.

The chart below shows how value stocks do better coming out of recessions, but how much growth has won in recent years.

This environment has been very favourable to stocks offering perceived defensive characteristics, such as infrastructure, or strong organic growth, such as healthcare. Valuations of these types of stocks have pushed up to high levels, both in absolute terms and versus their own historical valuation metrics. At the same time, value stocks have lagged and the valuation gap between cheap and expensive stocks is currently at record levels.

Value fighting back

In the second half of 2019, it appeared there was some light at the end of the tunnel. Global growth was starting to pick up, led by the US, as trade tensions eased and the UK election saw a resolution of the Brexit impasse. Bond yields were starting to tick up and value began logging several months of outperformance.

However, the COVID-19 pandemic put a halt to this, seeing economic growth collapse, interest rates slashed, and investors taking flight to ‘safe haven’ stocks. These factors predictably saw value underperform during the sell-off.

Tellingly, however, since its bottom in late March, the market has rallied sharply, led by cyclicals, and value outperformed strongly in April and May. Over this period, the Perennial Value Australian Shares Trust (PVAST) delivered a return of 19.9% versus the 14.1% return of the benchmark S&P/ASX 300 index. We believe the fund’s ‘true to label’ value approach was an important driver of outperformance during the rally.

The key point is that value tends to outperform not when a crisis is unfolding, but rather, in its aftermath. This is when either the bubbles of euphoria that had been driving the market up may have burst, or the fears that had driven the market down have been realised and dealt with. At this point, investors form the conclusion that the economy will recover, and life will go on. They then seek out solid, reliable, reasonably priced businesses to invest in – in other words, they look to value stocks.

These periods have also shown that style rotation, when it occurs, can happen sharply. When valuation dispersion reaches extreme levels, such as we are seeing today, something usually gives and mean reversion kicks in, resulting in a period of strong outperformance for value investing.

If current trends continue, then the impacts from COVID-19 may be less severe than feared and economies may bounce back. If this is the case, we will have an improving economic outlook, interest rates already at extremely low levels and unlikely to go any lower, and valuation dispersion at record levels. In effect, all the preconditions would be in place for a rotation to value.

Not only does maintaining an exposure to value alongside other styles provide a form of diversification in a portfolio, but after a long period in the wilderness, the tide may be turning in value’s favour.

 

Stephen Bruce is a Director of Perennial Value Management and Portfolio Manager of the Perennial Value Australian Shares Trust. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   8 July 2020
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Inflation: friend or foe of Value stocks in 2022?

Will the drought break for value stocks continue?

After 30 years of investing, I prefer to skip this party

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

Why it’s time to ditch the retirement journey

Retirement isn’t a clean financial arc. Income shocks, health costs and family pressures hit at random, exposing the limits of age-based planning and the myth of a predictable “retirement journey".

The housing market is heading into choppy waters

With rates on hold and housing demand strong, lenders are pushing boundaries. As risky products return, borrowers should be cautious and not let clever marketing cloud their judgment.

Latest Updates

Interviews

AFIC on the speculative ASX boom, opportunities, and LIC discounts

In an interview with Firstlinks, CEO Mark Freeman discusses how speculative ASX stocks have crushed blue chips this year, companies he likes now, and why he’s confident AFIC’s NTA discount will close.

Investment strategies

Solving the Australian equities conundrum

The ASX's performance this year has again highlighted a persistent riddle facing investors – how to approach an index reliant on a few sectors and handful of stocks. Here are some ideas on how to build a durable portfolio.

Retirement

Regulators warn super funds to lift retirement focus

Despite three years under the retirement income covenant, regulators warn a growing gap between leading and lagging super funds, driven by poor member insights and patchy outcomes measurement.

Shares

Australian equities: a tale of two markets

The ASX seems a market split in two: between the haves and have nots; or those with growth and momentum and those without. In this environment, opportunity favours those willing to look beyond the obvious.

Investment strategies

Dotcom on steroids Part II

OpenAI’s business model isn't sustainable in the long run. If markets catch on, the company could face higher borrowing costs, or worse, and that would have major spillover effects.

Investment strategies

AI’s debt binge draws European telco parallels

‘Hyperscalers’ including Google, Meta and Microsoft are fuelling an unprecedented surge in equity and debt issuance to bankroll massive AI-driven capital expenditure. History shows this isn't without risk.

Investment strategies

Leveraged single stock ETFs don't work as advertised

Leveraged ETFs seek to deliver some multiple of an underlying index or reference asset’s return over a day. Yet, they aren’t even delivering the target return on an average day as they’re meant to do.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.