Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 102

Asia: bull or bear in the Year of the Goat

Since 1973, the Year of the Goat has generated the highest average returns among the 12 Chinese zodiac symbols, averaging an impressive 45.3% each year, according to JP Morgan.  Leaving superstition aside, there are some strong fundamental reasons why equity markets in Asia can make like a bull in the Year of the Goat, 2015.

The growth premium appears to be re-gaining ground

Asia’s reputation as a high growth region came under pressure during the last few years as the growth premium narrowed. This is a key reason why the region has de-rated since 2010. However, it appears as though the growth premium has bottomed out and is now beginning to regain some ground. As global growth also improves, the high beta nature of Asian economies begins to work in their favour, not against them. This higher return potential suggests Asian equities are increasingly relevant in an investor’s asset allocation even when considering the higher risk nature of the region.

The slowdown in China shouldn’t be seen as a ‘negative’

While China is experiencing a slowdown in growth, this in itself is not a negative for equity markets. The Chinese equity market tends to get excited when real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth is above ‘potential growth’ and sells off when real GDP slows below potential growth.

But 2015 could mark the year in which Chinese growth rebases after stimulus-led excesses and real GDP growth are expected to remain in line with potential growth. At the very least, this should not provide another reason for a de-rating. As risk sentiment normalises and volatility subsides, risk aversion should be a buying opportunity when coupled with attractive valuations.

Earnings expectations have improved

Earnings expectations for Asia excluding Japan in 2015 are the most realistic they have been in years. Consensus is forecasting earnings per share growth of 9.5%, which is below the usual starting point of around 15% and the five-year compound annual growth rate of 11.4%. This provides some comfort that the downside risk to earnings estimates is relatively low.

We believe the earnings upside will come from margin expansion. Asian net margins are at their lowest level since the financial crisis but appear to be bottoming out. Margin expansion in the coming period is expected to be driven by a combination of lower commodity prices, lower interest expenses, less wage pressure and faster revenue growth.

This year, the opportunities for creating alpha appear the best since the global financial crisis. The correlation among stocks in Asia has declined to five-year lows. This is true whether analysing the correlation between the largest ten stocks in the regional index, the largest stocks in each country or the largest stocks in each sector.

Asia is going through a process of reform, with many governments taking the window of opportunity to reduce subsidies, make State Owned Enterprises more efficient, improve tax systems, introduce foreign direct investment and private capital and enforce environmental standards. These reforms are critical to overcoming some structural weaknesses that have been brought to light by the cyclical slowdown. Most reforms are market friendly and should help drive a market re-rating.

Risks

Two recent events that were cause for concern – the quantitative easing decision by the European Central Bank and the Greek Election/Exit – barely registered. There is risk around when the US will raise interest rates. Our view is it may be delayed into late 2015 or even 2016 due to deflation and a lack of wage growth. With liquidity conditions from Europe, Japan and China remaining supportive, this is not the greatest risk to Asia.

The greatest risk is a Japanese-inspired currency war due to the Bank of Japan Governor Kuroda’s steadfast refusal to budge from the 2% core inflation target. This is because the Japanese definition of core includes the price of oil. If the target is not revised lower or to a core ex-oil target, another round of quantitative easing will no doubt be needed. The resultant yen weakness could force competitive devaluations by other Asian countries, with Korea one of the biggest casualties.

The Chinese property market and debt build-up remain an ever-present risk. This has spawned a greater and more immediate risk of capital flight. In the fourth quarter of 2014 alone, the capital outflow amounted to Rmb600 million by some estimates. Luckily, this liquidity reduction was exactly offset by the Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR) cut. China has more fire power to do so with RRRs at 17.5-19.5%. Even if the ‘hot money‘ outflows are stemmed, there is a structural trend for more outward foreign direct investment. A prime example of this is the formerly unheard of Anbang Insurance’s US$2 billion purchase of New York’s Waldorf Astoria. This occurred after insurance companies were mandated to invest up to 15% of their capital offshore.

Portfolio positioning

We are overweight Asian equities from a dynamic asset allocation perspective. Within the region, our portfolios’ positioning is overweight China, Indonesia, India and the Philippines. However, stock selection remains paramount in light of the alpha opportunities and the concurrent risk.

Notwithstanding the risk of war – currency, physical or in cyberspace – Asian equity fundamentals look attractive. Valuations are supportive with realistic earnings estimates. Earnings upside comes from margin expansion on the back of falling commodity prices, lower wage pressure, faster revenue growth and lower interest rate cuts. The latter will also help drive a re-rating as the cost of equity falls as will an improvement in return on equity. All in all, we support the case for being a bull in the Year of the Goat.

 

Casey McLean is a Portfolio Manager and Analyst with AMP Capital Asian Equities. This article provides general information and does not address the personal circumstances of any individual.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

China’s new model is a plan for a hostile world

The prospects for investors in India

Reality may be worse than the Intergenerational Report expects

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.