Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 143

ATO perspective: ‘only’ 2,184 SMSFs have assets over $10 million

Both Chris Jordan, Commissioner of Taxation at the Australian Tax Office (ATO), and Greg Tanzer, Commissioner at the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC), gave an update on compliance and regulatory issues at the SMSF Association National Conference in Adelaide this week.

Jordan’s dominant message was that the tax system will be too complicated if it tries to control a few outliers. He told the conference, “Don’t design the system for the last worst person. You should make it easier for the majority.”

For SMSFs, he put the complaints about high value SMSFs into perspective. In 2015, 2,184 SMSFs had balances over $10 million, but they include up to four members in each fund. Only six funds had balances over $100 million. The ATO has looked closely at each and they are “accidents of history”, often with balances accumulated over 30 years with one or two investments that had done extremely well. There are an additional 994 APRA fund members with over $10 million.

But there are over half a million SMSFs. Do you design a system of regulation for the 99.5% with less than $10 million, or make it complex by focussing on the extremes? With the current contribution limits of $30,000 (or $35,000) concessional or $540,000 non-concessional (using the bring-forward rule), it is difficult to build very large balances now.

Notwithstanding, the ATO does look at out-of-pattern numbers, such as a large increase in income or assets in a particular year. These funds may be studied more closely. The ATO had a particular problem with one fund where the shares were revalued from zero to a large number as soon as the member reached the exempt income age. He said, “Was the investor suddenly striking gold? What were the real numbers?” They also had issues where a company with large franking credits was moved into superannuation giving the member a massive refund of franking credits.

In addressing this balance between over-regulation and compliance, Commissioner Jordan explained the priority of the ATO is to improve confidence and trust in the tax system and “contributing to economic and social wellbeing by fostering willing participation in tax system.”

People are more likely to comply:

  1. the easier it is to understand the tax rules, and
  2. the more confidence they have in the integrity in the tax system.

Taxpayers are confused by complexity. “If A to C is enough, why do we require everything from A to Z?” The aim is to make guidance specific, adopt better early engagement and try not to take people to court and write lengthy letters.

For SMSFs, his particular focus is on related entity rules, and that the assets of the super fund are not for the trustees to use in any way they wish. For example, some people with gambling habits had written cheques from their funds to cover their habits. The ATO also wants Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements done properly, and anyone with a problem should contact the ATO rather than waiting to be caught. He wants an “open architecture in communications”.

He is also concerned that some SMSF auditors advertise a $200 cost for an automated online audit. Is it adding any real value? What do they really do for so little, where are they, and what’s it worth? The vast majority of taxpayers and industry professionals want to do the right thing, and the ATO wants to balance the cost of compliance versus oversight. Industry must help sort it out.

Greg Tanzer, ASIC Commissioner, explained how the regulators work closely together, with much better cooperation and communication recently. There are 6,700 registered SMSF auditors, but to be eligible, they need to pass a range of tests including at least 300 hours’ experience of auditing under supervision. This is not basic accounting but verifiable SMSF work. ASIC cancelled about 400 registrations last year for auditors failing to complete the required examinations. SMSF auditor problems include a lack of arms’ length on some transactions and poor quality documentation.

Tanzer emphasised the changes coming to accountants working with SMSFs. Until 30 June 2016, accountants can provide advice on establishing and operating an SMSF under an exemption from licensing requirements. This exemption has now been removed (and accountants always needed an AFSL to provide investment advice). There is an opportunity to apply for a limited licence by 30 June 2016 which includes the relaxation of some education requirements. However, accountants who want to continue to work with SMSFs must apply for a licence by 1 March 2016. It’s a serious application process and it will take a while for ASIC to review. He warned, “If you don’t have a licence after 30 June, you will be acting illegally.”

Accountants can be authorised under another AFSL, or apply for a limited or full licence, or change the business model to only do some bookkeeping. But accountants will no longer be able to advise on establishing or operating SMSFs unless licenced.

In summary, Tanzer added, “SMSFs are a marvellous competitive foil for retail and industry funds.” ASIC strongly supports the choice offered by SMSFs, but trustees need to realise that having their own fund is a weighty responsibility.

 

Graham Hand attended the SMSF Association National Conference courtesy of the Association. These comments are general interpretations and do not address any personal circumstances.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

What are wealth industry regulators thinking about?

SMSFs: 8 reasons they are over-spruiked and over-rated

Meeting the work test for contributions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.