Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 80

ATO ruling affects assets after divorce

Individuals hold their assets in a variety of entities, such as companies, trusts or other types of arrangements. In the context of family law, divorcing spouses often funded their divorce settlements using assets held by private companies. This was because family law settlements did not attract tax in the way normal commercial transactions might.

However, on 30 July 2014 the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) issued a final public ruling making it far more difficult for spouses to use income and other property held in a private company to fund property settlements tax-free. Instead, payments made from private companies will now be considered ‘dividends’ and subject to personal income tax. Depending on the marginal tax rate of the spouse involved, a tax of up to 49% of the gross figure could be payable, reducing a divorce settlement by almost half. The difficulty applies to all couples, regardless of whether their companies have $100 or $1,000,000 worth of assets.

In addition to the increased cost of divorce, some commentators have warned that the need to fund a divorcing spouse’s tax bill could convert a 50-50 settlement into a 60-40 settlement or worse, resulting in an obvious inequity between the parties. Further, for those companies that are already struggling financially, the need to make a large payment to a divorcing spouse and also fund that spouse’s new tax bill could have dire consequences for the company’s success.

To reduce the tax liability, parties might choose an alternative way to divide their assets upon divorce. For example, it might be possible to provide the divorcing spouse with another asset, such as a property or a motor vehicle, or a spouse might be paid from a non-company entity, such as an individual or a trust, by using the company’s assets as security. Alternatively, a company restructure might enable a spouse to receive shares in the company instead. In this regard, a spouse can take advantage of the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) rollover provisions and defer any tax payable until another CGT event occurs (such as selling the asset to someone else). However, divorcing spouses must ensure that such a restructure does not contravene any of the ATO’s anti-avoidance rules.

Unfortunately, not all divorcing spouses will have these options available and in such circumstances, the extra tax liability must be considered early on and apportioned appropriately between the parties. A good understanding of the tax ramifications of any property settlement will be key to ensuring the after-tax split between the parties is not a nasty surprise. Accordingly, it will be important for divorcing spouses to receive specialist advice from experienced family lawyers and in some circumstances, accountants.

 

Sarah Hendry is a Solicitor at Foulsham & Geddes Solicitors and Attorneys. This article provides general information and does not constitute personal advice.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Consulting on the side? Don't fall into these tax traps

Are you paying tax by not starting a super pension?

Most people (and the ATO) do not know their super tax

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.