Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 171

Finding beneficial tax alternatives to super

Many Australians have a large amount of their wealth concentrated under the single regulatory structure of superannuation. While super remains a tax-effective investment vehicle in most circumstances, the financial planning sector and its clients have been upended by the Federal Government’s 2016 Budget proposals.

The announcement of a proposed $500,000 cap on non-concessional contributions (NCCs) over the course of a lifetime represents a dramatic change to the status quo, taking investors and financial planners off guard.

Currently an individual can make NCCs of $180,000 a year, or in some cases $540,000 every three years under the bring-forward rule. But under the proposed changes, NCCs that push above the $500,000 cap will either have to be withdrawn from the super system or face tax penalties for leaving it there.

The Government has also proposed plans to scrap the over-50s concessional (before-tax) contributions cap of $35,000, and reduce the general concessional contributions to $25,000 from its current $30,000, taking effect from 1 July 2017. This includes everything from an employer’s Superannuation Guarantee contribution, to salary-sacrificed contributions, and contributions from the self-employed.

Plus the threshold at which an additional tax of 15% (taking the total rate to 30%) is payable on contributions will apply for anyone with a taxable income above $250,000, reduced from the previous $300,000. This effectively means that the maximum tax advantage for a taxpayer earning more than $250,000 annually from contributing $25,000 to super will soon be less than $5,000.

Additionally, super rules regarding accessing funds before retirement remain rigid, and the proposed changes actively discourage retirees from using their super as a means of estate planning.

By proposing changes to superannuation’s tax advantages, the Government has left many looking for alternative ways to complement their retirement savings outside of superannuation. Some options are looking increasingly attractive, especially for individuals on higher marginal tax rates, in addition to their super plans.

The three main alternative retirement investment strategies consist of setting up a private company, buying investment (insurance) bonds, and setting up a family trust, all of which have unique taxation advantages.

Private company structures

High net worth individuals may benefit from setting up a private company, but this may only work as a tax-deferral mechanism. Earnings on funds are currently taxed at the company rate of 30% while the funds are held within the company.

However, when company profits are distributed, they are normally treated as a dividend payment and included in assessable income, attracting tax at the marginal tax rate, less any franking credits. Any tax offset for franking credits merely compensates for company profits that have already been taxed.

Company profits can be transferred to an individual as salary/wages, director’s fees, or interest on any loans advanced to the company, but those amounts still need to be included in assessable income. Similarly, if company funds are distributed to shareholders through loans or forgiven debts, they also attract tax.

A company shareholder can achieve a lower tax burden by selling an interest for a capital gain after holding it for at least one year and if 50% of the ‘discounted capital gain’ becomes exempt from tax. Conversely, if the share interest is sold for a capital loss, it can only be offset against any current or future capital gains, and is not deductible against ordinary assessable income. If an investor never offset the capital loss, the tax benefit is lost.

Investment bonds

Investment bonds (sometimes called insurance bonds) have taxation advantages that don’t exist in company structures, and a wide range of asset classes is available through a single market-linked investment vehicle.

More importantly, there were no changes mooted to investment bonds in the 2016 Budget, and there have been few significant changes to these structures in the past 20 years. Their regulatory regime has remained stable whilst super and personal income tax regimes undergo political and regulatory upheaval.

Earnings are taxed within the bond structure itself at a maximum tax rate of 30%. As an investor, investment bond earnings are not included as part of taxable income and therefore do not attract, or increase, the marginal tax rate. This means tax on investment earnings is permanently capped at 30%, offering a tax-effective savings solution for middle- to high-income earners on marginal tax rates (including the Medicare Levy) of 34.5% (for taxable incomes over $37,000), 39% (taxable incomes over $80,000) and 49% (taxable incomes over $180,000 – where there is also a 2% Temporary Budget Repair Levy).

If the investment bond is held for at least 10 years, none of the withdrawn earnings will be included as personal assessable income. With a few exceptions, such as special circumstances such as death, disability, or serious illness, the earnings component of withdrawals within the first 10 years is included in assessable income, however a 30% tax credit that has been already paid on the bond is then applied to offset the impact of the tax.

Like regular managed funds, investments held within an investment bond are entitled to full franking credits, with such credits reflected in the effective rate of tax paid by the investment bond. Earnings are automatically reinvested, which means the bond’s reinvestment dates do not need to be tracked for personal tax purposes.

There is no limit on the amount initially invested, while subsequent investments of up to 125% of the previous year’s contribution can be made without restarting the 10-year investment period. Investors also have the option of starting a new investment bond at any time for any amount. Unlike super, investment bonds attract no excess contributions tax.

Additionally, investment bonds do not carry restrictions on withdrawals prior to preservation age. For super to be non-taxable, the investor needs to be 60 and satisfy a condition of release. Funds in investment bonds can be withdrawn at any time, though there are obvious advantages to keeping money in the fund for at least 10 years.

More importantly, once taxable income hits $250,000 or more, the tax rate on super contributions under the proposed changes will be 30%, which is the same as the tax rate on investment bonds, while the latter provide greater flexibility, especially in access to funds.

With an investment bond, ownership can be transferred at any time with the original start date retained for tax purposes. In the event of death, the tax-free lump sum is paid to nominated beneficiaries or estate.

Family trusts

A family trust is a discretionary trust set up to hold a family’s assets for investment purposes. The income beneficiaries are usually the taxpayer trustee and spouse, their company, adult children, children's spouses, grandchildren and their spouses and any registered charity.

The main advantage of family trusts is their ability to arbitrage tax between family members where their income is variable and they pay different tax rates. Any income or capital gains from the trust are distributed to beneficiaries, usually annually, to those on incomes with the lowest marginal tax rates. This is particularly advantageous when some family members (but not children under 18) may be studying full-time or only working part-time.

Additionally, trustees can put money into their trust, which is then lent to the high income-earning individual for investment purposes. Instead of paying interest to the bank, they pay it to the trust and the income is distributed to beneficiaries on low or nil tax rates, making it a tax-effective form of wealth creation.

Under current family trust tax law, a child under 18 can only earn up to $416 a year tax free, after which tax rates differ depending on what offsets are available. Once a child turns 18, the tax-free threshold rises to $18,200.

 

Alan Hartstein is Deputy Editor at Cuffelinks. Centuria Life, an issuer of investment bonds, is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information considered accurate at the time of writing and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

2 Comments
Tony Kench
September 01, 2016

Hi Alan

Good article overall, certainly worth considering as savings vehicles for high rate taxpayers who cant justify family trusts and the like because of smaller amounts to invest.

I can see your logic in comparing the tax rate on super contributions to the tax rate on investment earnings of the insurance bonds. The money going into insurance bonds is after tax funds - in the same way it would be for a non concessional super contribution.
This compares to the 19% extra benefits afforded for concessional contributions for those with income over $300,000

And then you are comparing taxes on investments super is still lower at 15% on income and 10% on capital gains held for more than a year. than within the insurance bond context.

My understanding is the investments underlying insurance bonds are taxed like a company so effectively at 30% on income and on capital gains. which is actually a higher rate on gains than if the investors held the assets personally.

while you get the investments out tax free on the gain, I believe this is to prevent double taxation. There has effectively been tax paid on gains on the way through at 30%, and this also would reflect in unit pricing that takes taxes on unrealised gains into account.

kevin
September 03, 2016

Is it not a case of the tax tail wagging the investment dog.Why do we concentrate on minimising tax,by all means minimise ,but..If anyone is paying tax @say 70,80 K a year in retirement,mainly made up from dividend franking,then having the tax free super,they would be having a good retirement.

I always based my planning on that.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Eight investment pools in the new tax hierarchy

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Latest Updates

A nation of landlords and fund managers

Super and housing dwarf every other asset class in Australia, and they’ve both become too big to fail. Can they continue to grow at current rates, and if so, what are the implications for the economy, work and markets?

Economy

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Retirement

Retiring debt-free may not be the best strategy

Retiring with debt may have advantages. Maintaining a mortgage on the family home can provide a line of credit in retirement for flexibility, extra income, and a DIY reverse mortgage strategy.

Shares

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

The ASX is shrinking not by accident, but by design. A governance model that rewards detachment over ownership is driving capital into private hands and weakening public markets.

Investment strategies

3 reasons the party in big tech stocks may be over

The AI boom has sparked investor euphoria, but under the surface, US big tech is showing cracks - slowing growth, surging capex, and fading dominance signal it's time to question conventional tech optimism.

Investment strategies

Resilience is the new alpha

Trade is now a strategic weapon, reshaping the investment landscape. In this environment, resilient companies - those capable of absorbing shocks and defending margins - are best positioned to outperform.

Shares

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

The next generation of wealth creation is likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. Four signs can alert investors to these companies before the crowds.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.