Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 171

Finding beneficial tax alternatives to super

Many Australians have a large amount of their wealth concentrated under the single regulatory structure of superannuation. While super remains a tax-effective investment vehicle in most circumstances, the financial planning sector and its clients have been upended by the Federal Government’s 2016 Budget proposals.

The announcement of a proposed $500,000 cap on non-concessional contributions (NCCs) over the course of a lifetime represents a dramatic change to the status quo, taking investors and financial planners off guard.

Currently an individual can make NCCs of $180,000 a year, or in some cases $540,000 every three years under the bring-forward rule. But under the proposed changes, NCCs that push above the $500,000 cap will either have to be withdrawn from the super system or face tax penalties for leaving it there.

The Government has also proposed plans to scrap the over-50s concessional (before-tax) contributions cap of $35,000, and reduce the general concessional contributions to $25,000 from its current $30,000, taking effect from 1 July 2017. This includes everything from an employer’s Superannuation Guarantee contribution, to salary-sacrificed contributions, and contributions from the self-employed.

Plus the threshold at which an additional tax of 15% (taking the total rate to 30%) is payable on contributions will apply for anyone with a taxable income above $250,000, reduced from the previous $300,000. This effectively means that the maximum tax advantage for a taxpayer earning more than $250,000 annually from contributing $25,000 to super will soon be less than $5,000.

Additionally, super rules regarding accessing funds before retirement remain rigid, and the proposed changes actively discourage retirees from using their super as a means of estate planning.

By proposing changes to superannuation’s tax advantages, the Government has left many looking for alternative ways to complement their retirement savings outside of superannuation. Some options are looking increasingly attractive, especially for individuals on higher marginal tax rates, in addition to their super plans.

The three main alternative retirement investment strategies consist of setting up a private company, buying investment (insurance) bonds, and setting up a family trust, all of which have unique taxation advantages.

Private company structures

High net worth individuals may benefit from setting up a private company, but this may only work as a tax-deferral mechanism. Earnings on funds are currently taxed at the company rate of 30% while the funds are held within the company.

However, when company profits are distributed, they are normally treated as a dividend payment and included in assessable income, attracting tax at the marginal tax rate, less any franking credits. Any tax offset for franking credits merely compensates for company profits that have already been taxed.

Company profits can be transferred to an individual as salary/wages, director’s fees, or interest on any loans advanced to the company, but those amounts still need to be included in assessable income. Similarly, if company funds are distributed to shareholders through loans or forgiven debts, they also attract tax.

A company shareholder can achieve a lower tax burden by selling an interest for a capital gain after holding it for at least one year and if 50% of the ‘discounted capital gain’ becomes exempt from tax. Conversely, if the share interest is sold for a capital loss, it can only be offset against any current or future capital gains, and is not deductible against ordinary assessable income. If an investor never offset the capital loss, the tax benefit is lost.

Investment bonds

Investment bonds (sometimes called insurance bonds) have taxation advantages that don’t exist in company structures, and a wide range of asset classes is available through a single market-linked investment vehicle.

More importantly, there were no changes mooted to investment bonds in the 2016 Budget, and there have been few significant changes to these structures in the past 20 years. Their regulatory regime has remained stable whilst super and personal income tax regimes undergo political and regulatory upheaval.

Earnings are taxed within the bond structure itself at a maximum tax rate of 30%. As an investor, investment bond earnings are not included as part of taxable income and therefore do not attract, or increase, the marginal tax rate. This means tax on investment earnings is permanently capped at 30%, offering a tax-effective savings solution for middle- to high-income earners on marginal tax rates (including the Medicare Levy) of 34.5% (for taxable incomes over $37,000), 39% (taxable incomes over $80,000) and 49% (taxable incomes over $180,000 – where there is also a 2% Temporary Budget Repair Levy).

If the investment bond is held for at least 10 years, none of the withdrawn earnings will be included as personal assessable income. With a few exceptions, such as special circumstances such as death, disability, or serious illness, the earnings component of withdrawals within the first 10 years is included in assessable income, however a 30% tax credit that has been already paid on the bond is then applied to offset the impact of the tax.

Like regular managed funds, investments held within an investment bond are entitled to full franking credits, with such credits reflected in the effective rate of tax paid by the investment bond. Earnings are automatically reinvested, which means the bond’s reinvestment dates do not need to be tracked for personal tax purposes.

There is no limit on the amount initially invested, while subsequent investments of up to 125% of the previous year’s contribution can be made without restarting the 10-year investment period. Investors also have the option of starting a new investment bond at any time for any amount. Unlike super, investment bonds attract no excess contributions tax.

Additionally, investment bonds do not carry restrictions on withdrawals prior to preservation age. For super to be non-taxable, the investor needs to be 60 and satisfy a condition of release. Funds in investment bonds can be withdrawn at any time, though there are obvious advantages to keeping money in the fund for at least 10 years.

More importantly, once taxable income hits $250,000 or more, the tax rate on super contributions under the proposed changes will be 30%, which is the same as the tax rate on investment bonds, while the latter provide greater flexibility, especially in access to funds.

With an investment bond, ownership can be transferred at any time with the original start date retained for tax purposes. In the event of death, the tax-free lump sum is paid to nominated beneficiaries or estate.

Family trusts

A family trust is a discretionary trust set up to hold a family’s assets for investment purposes. The income beneficiaries are usually the taxpayer trustee and spouse, their company, adult children, children's spouses, grandchildren and their spouses and any registered charity.

The main advantage of family trusts is their ability to arbitrage tax between family members where their income is variable and they pay different tax rates. Any income or capital gains from the trust are distributed to beneficiaries, usually annually, to those on incomes with the lowest marginal tax rates. This is particularly advantageous when some family members (but not children under 18) may be studying full-time or only working part-time.

Additionally, trustees can put money into their trust, which is then lent to the high income-earning individual for investment purposes. Instead of paying interest to the bank, they pay it to the trust and the income is distributed to beneficiaries on low or nil tax rates, making it a tax-effective form of wealth creation.

Under current family trust tax law, a child under 18 can only earn up to $416 a year tax free, after which tax rates differ depending on what offsets are available. Once a child turns 18, the tax-free threshold rises to $18,200.

 

Alan Hartstein is Deputy Editor at Cuffelinks. Centuria Life, an issuer of investment bonds, is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information considered accurate at the time of writing and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

2 Comments
Tony Kench
September 01, 2016

Hi Alan

Good article overall, certainly worth considering as savings vehicles for high rate taxpayers who cant justify family trusts and the like because of smaller amounts to invest.

I can see your logic in comparing the tax rate on super contributions to the tax rate on investment earnings of the insurance bonds. The money going into insurance bonds is after tax funds - in the same way it would be for a non concessional super contribution.
This compares to the 19% extra benefits afforded for concessional contributions for those with income over $300,000

And then you are comparing taxes on investments super is still lower at 15% on income and 10% on capital gains held for more than a year. than within the insurance bond context.

My understanding is the investments underlying insurance bonds are taxed like a company so effectively at 30% on income and on capital gains. which is actually a higher rate on gains than if the investors held the assets personally.

while you get the investments out tax free on the gain, I believe this is to prevent double taxation. There has effectively been tax paid on gains on the way through at 30%, and this also would reflect in unit pricing that takes taxes on unrealised gains into account.

kevin
September 03, 2016

Is it not a case of the tax tail wagging the investment dog.Why do we concentrate on minimising tax,by all means minimise ,but..If anyone is paying tax @say 70,80 K a year in retirement,mainly made up from dividend franking,then having the tax free super,they would be having a good retirement.

I always based my planning on that.

 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.