Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 92

Benefits of long term investing

My previous Cuffelinks article argued that long term investors are characterised by high discretion over their trading, coupled with a long term perspective. This follow-up sets out the advantages for such investors and the associated strategies they might pursue. Long term investing is neither easy nor a guarantee of success, but the main reason to expect it to succeed is because many markets are dominated by short term investors, implying the long term is often undervalued.

Three advantages held by long term investors draw on discretion over trading, which underwrites the capacity to maintain positions through difficult times, plus an approach to identifying opportunities that evaluates long term value or expected long term returns.

  • Capacity to invest where the timing of the payoff is uncertain – Some investment opportunities have a high probability that a payoff will occur eventually yet the timing is uncertain. That is, they can remain primarily concerned with if, rather than when, they get a return. Capacity to be patient and far-sighted is useful when assets are discounted because of problems that should be eventually resolved. A long term investor is able to buy and wait. Meanwhile, short term investors may avoid seemingly ‘cheap’ assets due to aspects such as near-term business difficulties, evident selling pressure, or the absence of an immediate catalyst for price adjustment.
  • Ability to exploit opportunities generated by short term investors – Short term investors may be required to trade or act in a short-sighted manner. This can result in assets becoming either mispriced, or offering unusually high (or low) returns. Long term investors may take the ‘other side of the trade’, precisely because they are not affected by the same concerns. For instance, many risk premiums arise because short term investors are averse to certain types of risks that long term investors are well-placed to bear.
  • Latitude to invest in unlisted and/or illiquid assets – While it is true that a long horizon is required to invest in illiquid assets, this advantage is sometimes overstated, and viewed too simplistically. For instance, it can be dangerous to presume that an illiquidity premium exists just because an asset is illiquid. The real advantage is that a wider range of investments and strategies is available, including: opportunities arising from imperfections in illiquid markets; capacity to add economic value through direct control; and better diversification.

Overall, long term investing offers access to a broader opportunity set. Conceptually, long term investors can do anything that short term investors can do, plus more. Eight investment strategies where a long term investor might exploit their advantages are:

  • Accessing risk premiums – Some risk premiums arise in part from concerns over potential for large, intermittent losses; while offering sizeable average returns for those who can hang in there. Included are market risk premium; volatility premium (accessed via volatility derivatives and options markets); illiquidity premium; and various insurance premiums, e.g. catastrophe bonds.
  • Liquidity provision – During market crises, long term investors may buy from investors who are required to sell due to loss of funding or pressure to rein in their exposure. Recent examples include corporate bond and US housing markets during the GFC. Conversely, they might sell into liquidity-driven booms that push prices too high, and then sit on the sidelines unburdened by compulsion to remain invested. Trading against the market during these times requires both a long horizon and fortitude.
  • Value investing – Value strategies often entail buying when prices are low because problems abound; and selling when prices are high because everything looks rosy. Hence value investors are typically acting against market opinion and momentum. Further, the timing of any payoff can be open-ended. There is a capacity to look through near-term pressures towards long term value and sustain a position.
  • Exploiting pricing discrepancies across segmented markets – Pricing discrepancies can occur across markets that are related yet segmented due to frictions. Examples include discrepancies between unlisted and listed counterparts (e.g. unlisted versus listed infrastructure), or geographical disparities (e.g. property across countries). There is often uncertainty over the mechanism and timing of re-alignment.
  • Long term thematic investing – Slow-moving but persistent trends accumulate over time and may be swamped by volatility over the short term. Examples might include the impact of long term macroeconomic trends, demographic changes, cultural shifts, technological developments and environmental change.
  • Adding economic value through engagement and control – Long term investors might generate additional returns by applying their influence towards the creation of economic value, e.g. pursuing value-added or opportunistic property investments.
  • Investing in complex assets – Complex assets can be attractively priced as a consequence of opaqueness, especially if uncertainties might take a long term to resolve. Investors with the resources to perform in-depth evaluations may benefit from waiting for the payoff.
  • Dynamic strategies – Dynamic strategies of buying when expected returns are high and selling when they are low often amounts to a counter-cyclical approach that stands against the market. Dynamic strategies also incorporate holding ‘cash as an option’, thus keeping some powder dry.

 

In summary, most of the benefits of long term investing stem from a preparedness to take positions related to the actions or aversions of short term investors. Many commentators consider ‘short-termism’ as pervasive and a scourge. Another perspective is that short-termism provides a source of opportunity for those willing and able to adopt a long term approach.

 

Geoff Warren is Research Director at the Centre for International Finance and Regulation (CIFR). This article is for general information purposes and readers should seek independent advice about their personal circumstances.

CIFR recently collaborated with the Future Fund on a research project examining long term investing from an institutional investor perspective. This is the second in a series of Cuffelinks articles aiming to bring out some of the key messages for a broader audience. The (lengthy) full report, which comprises three papers, can be found at: http://www.cifr.edu.au/project/T003.aspx

 

  •   12 December 2014
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Don’t set and forget

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.