Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 92

Benefits of long term investing

My previous Cuffelinks article argued that long term investors are characterised by high discretion over their trading, coupled with a long term perspective. This follow-up sets out the advantages for such investors and the associated strategies they might pursue. Long term investing is neither easy nor a guarantee of success, but the main reason to expect it to succeed is because many markets are dominated by short term investors, implying the long term is often undervalued.

Three advantages held by long term investors draw on discretion over trading, which underwrites the capacity to maintain positions through difficult times, plus an approach to identifying opportunities that evaluates long term value or expected long term returns.

  1. Capacity to invest where the timing of the payoff is uncertain – Some investment opportunities have a high probability that a payoff will occur eventually yet the timing is uncertain. That is, they can remain primarily concerned with if, rather than when, they get a return. Capacity to be patient and far-sighted is useful when assets are discounted because of problems that should be eventually resolved. A long term investor is able to buy and wait. Meanwhile, short term investors may avoid seemingly ‘cheap’ assets due to aspects such as near-term business difficulties, evident selling pressure, or the absence of an immediate catalyst for price adjustment.
  2. Ability to exploit opportunities generated by short term investors – Short term investors may be required to trade or act in a short-sighted manner. This can result in assets becoming either mispriced, or offering unusually high (or low) returns. Long term investors may take the ‘other side of the trade’, precisely because they are not affected by the same concerns. For instance, many risk premiums arise because short term investors are averse to certain types of risks that long term investors are well-placed to bear.
  3. Latitude to invest in unlisted and/or illiquid assets – While it is true that a long horizon is required to invest in illiquid assets, this advantage is sometimes overstated, and viewed too simplistically. For instance, it can be dangerous to presume that an illiquidity premium exists just because an asset is illiquid. The real advantage is that a wider range of investments and strategies is available, including: opportunities arising from imperfections in illiquid markets; capacity to add economic value through direct control; and better diversification.

Overall, long term investing offers access to a broader opportunity set. Conceptually, long term investors can do anything that short term investors can do, plus more. Eight investment strategies where a long term investor might exploit their advantages are:

  1. Accessing risk premiums – Some risk premiums arise in part from concerns over potential for large, intermittent losses; while offering sizeable average returns for those who can hang in there. Included are market risk premium; volatility premium (accessed via volatility derivatives and options markets); illiquidity premium; and various insurance premiums, e.g. catastrophe bonds.
  2. Liquidity provision – During market crises, long term investors may buy from investors who are required to sell due to loss of funding or pressure to rein in their exposure. Recent examples include corporate bond and US housing markets during the GFC. Conversely, they might sell into liquidity-driven booms that push prices too high, and then sit on the sidelines unburdened by compulsion to remain invested. Trading against the market during these times requires both a long horizon and fortitude.
  3. Value investing – Value strategies often entail buying when prices are low because problems abound; and selling when prices are high because everything looks rosy. Hence value investors are typically acting against market opinion and momentum. Further, the timing of any payoff can be open-ended. There is a capacity to look through near-term pressures towards long term value and sustain a position.
  4. Exploiting pricing discrepancies across segmented markets – Pricing discrepancies can occur across markets that are related yet segmented due to frictions. Examples include discrepancies between unlisted and listed counterparts (e.g. unlisted versus listed infrastructure), or geographical disparities (e.g. property across countries). There is often uncertainty over the mechanism and timing of re-alignment.
  5. Long term thematic investing – Slow-moving but persistent trends accumulate over time and may be swamped by volatility over the short term. Examples might include the impact of long term macroeconomic trends, demographic changes, cultural shifts, technological developments and environmental change.
  6. Adding economic value through engagement and control – Long term investors might generate additional returns by applying their influence towards the creation of economic value, e.g. pursuing value-added or opportunistic property investments.
  7. Investing in complex assets – Complex assets can be attractively priced as a consequence of opaqueness, especially if uncertainties might take a long term to resolve. Investors with the resources to perform in-depth evaluations may benefit from waiting for the payoff.
  8. Dynamic strategies – Dynamic strategies of buying when expected returns are high and selling when they are low often amounts to a counter-cyclical approach that stands against the market. Dynamic strategies also incorporate holding ‘cash as an option’, thus keeping some powder dry.

In summary, most of the benefits of long term investing stem from a preparedness to take positions related to the actions or aversions of short term investors. Many commentators consider ‘short-termism’ as pervasive and a scourge. Another perspective is that short-termism provides a source of opportunity for those willing and able to adopt a long term approach.


Geoff Warren is Research Director at the Centre for International Finance and Regulation (CIFR). This article is for general information purposes and readers should seek independent advice about their personal circumstances.

CIFR recently collaborated with the Future Fund on a research project examining long term investing from an institutional investor perspective. This is the second in a series of Cuffelinks articles aiming to bring out some of the key messages for a broader audience. The (lengthy) full report, which comprises three papers, can be found at:


Leave a Comment:



Don’t set and forget


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.