Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 82

Building more relevant Australian share portfolios

The Australian equity portfolio management industry is highly competitive. However, the portfolios it delivers can be under-diversified by security and sector, and key product offerings appear undifferentiated to all but the keenest observers. With the exception of some funds focussed on companies outside the largest 100 companies, most managers’ portfolios mirror the capitalisation-weighted S&P/ASX 200 index.

Is this a problem? After all, over the last two decades the returns from professionally-managed Australian share portfolios have been attractive. To the extent that there is a problem, it is fair to say a good deal of responsibility rests with clients and intermediaries rather than investment managers. In this industry products and services respond rapidly to well-articulated and consistent demand but the incentives clients set for managers is a key impediment to innovation.

Clients and their advisers define equity mandates in terms of the S&P/ASX 200 benchmark portfolio, and assess performance relative to the benchmark over short periods. Sometimes management contracts incorporate performance fees which specifically reference these benchmark returns. It is therefore entirely sensible for a manager to reflect their investment insights through a portfolio of securities whose weights are anchored to the security and sector weights of the benchmark.

The resulting portfolios become under-diversified because the benchmark itself is under-diversified. While the index incorporates around 200 securities, its eight largest names represent over half the benchmark capitalisation while two of the ten industry sectors – Financials and Materials - represent over 60% of its capitalisation. A manager who is not attracted to these particular segments of the market, but operates under a benchmark-focussed mandate, can feel constrained in terms of how aggressively they can represent these views in their portfolio. Where the manager would prefer to express a favourable view of these market segments, there is a risk that the portfolio becomes dangerously concentrated.

How might clients and intermediaries reframe mandates to better leverage managers’ investment insights? The starting point is to understand how an investor defines investment success. Is the benchmark index really so important to achieving the client’s goals? Here we consider ways to deliver superior benchmark-relative portfolios as well as identifying some increasingly important alternative goals.

Benchmark-relative approaches and expensive indexing

Super funds and large wealth managers typically conform to the institutional approach of delivering benchmark-focussed Australian equity portfolios to their members and clients. They believe, perhaps implicitly, that their own performance will be assessed relative to the benchmark index or relative to their benchmark-focussed peer group.

These portfolios are often created by allocating broad market mandates to several equity managers, each selected for their capacity to deliver returns in excess of the S&P/ASX 200 index. Given the concentrated nature of the benchmark this approach can be an inefficient and expensive way to capture and deliver the managers’ collective insight.

The source of the inefficiency is most apparent in the super funds’ overall exposure to the larger companies in the market. Rather than directly reflecting a manager’s optimism about a stock’s return prospects, the aggregate exposure to a large-cap company ends up reflecting the managers’ outlook for these stocks plus their different attitudes to benchmark-relative risk management.

In practice, super fund managers can end up trading between themselves in these larger names which is inefficient from a transaction cost, tax and management fee perspective. This is most evident in cases where a position taken by one manager largely offsets the position of another. This inefficiency leads to the somewhat unfair description of multi-manager portfolios as ‘expensive indexing’.

One simple approach to address this is to specify mandates that require managers to operate in market segments where their insights are likely to be most effective. For instance, the 20 largest companies are extensively researched by analysts yet coverage of mid-cap and small-cap names is more limited. A skilful manager who takes a position in these less researched stocks could earn a higher reward for risk.

A super fund that mandates most of its Australian equity managers to replicate the benchmark for the market’s top 20 stocks, while focussing on stock selection for the remainder of the universe, obtains several benefits:

  • Transaction costs, tax leakage and management costs will be reduced in this portfolio design.
  • While the level of return above benchmark may be modestly reduced, relative to the approach based on broad market benchmarks, the profile of the excess returns delivered should be far more stable.
  • Super funds that are genuinely concerned about benchmark concentration in Australian shares have the opportunity to adjust their overall share portfolio without disrupting their underlying managers preferred positioning.

Some SMSFs might be more attracted to managed funds where exposure to larger Australian companies has been excluded. These SMSFs might believe they are as well-placed as the professionals to build a portfolio of large cap stocks while acknowledging they lack the capability to research smaller companies.

Goal-based strategies

There are a growing number of investors who care more about the achievement of their own specific goals rather than sweating on a manager’s short-term performance relative to a benchmark. For these investors the benchmark index merely presents an opportune set of securities rather than a neutral portfolio or a performance hurdle.

Their focus is on the design and management of a portfolio of securities with suitable fundamental and technical characteristics to support their desired outcome. When compared to benchmark-focussed approaches, these tailored portfolios typically have higher exposures to mid- and small-cap stocks and less to the large-caps.

Three differentiated investment outcomes appear to resonate with clients:

  1. the delivery of a sustainable income stream (Australian equity income strategies)
  2. resilient growth in wealth (resilient equity strategies)
  3. high, long-term compound growth in wealth (long-term, long only strategies).

The critical distinction between these goal-based strategies and the benchmark-focussed approach is that managers are responsible for the total risk and return characteristics of their portfolios rather than just excess return and tracking error to benchmark.


The vast majority of managed funds and mandates in Australian equities deliver broad market portfolios. The future is likely to be different with clients becoming more involved in specifying the segments in which their managers operate and the outcomes they require.


Jeff Rogers is Chief Investment Officer at ipac Securities, AMP Capital.


Five personal checks on your financial health

How dot plots and tiny triangles shape our investments

Bounce back delivers super second-half for IPOs


Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Latest Updates


'It’s your money' schemes transfer super from young to old

With the Coalition losing the 2022 election, its policy to allow young people to access super goes back on the shelf. But lowering the downsizer age to 55 was supported by Labor. Check the merits of both policies.

Investment strategies

Rising recession risk and what it means for your portfolio

In this environment, safe-haven assets like Government bonds act as a diversifier given the uncorrelated nature to equities during periods of risk-off, while offering a yield above term deposit rates.

Investment strategies

‘Multidiscipline’: the secret of Bezos' and Buffett’s wild success

A key attribute of great investors is the ability to abstract away the specifics of a particular domain, leaving only the important underlying principles upon which great investments can be made.


Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.


Confession season is upon us: What’s next for equity markets

Companies tend to pre-position weak results ahead of 30 June, leading to earnings downgrades. The next two months will be critical for investors as a shift from ‘great expectations’ to ‘clear explanations’ gets underway.


Australia, the Lucky Country again?

We may have been extremely unlucky with the unforgiving weather plaguing the East Coast of Australia this year. However, on the economic front we are by many measures in a strong position relative to the rest of the world.

Exchange traded products

LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

Discounts on LICs and LITs vary with market conditions, and many prominent managers have seen the value of their assets fall as well as discount widen. There may be opportunities for gains if discounts narrow.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.