Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 99

Can an SMSF run a business?

I am often asked whether an SMSF can run a business. The usual reason for this question is not because the SMSF trustees are thinking of starting a conventional business, but because they are attracted to their SMSF running a share trading business. I’ll explain why later.

While the superannuation law does not specifically disallow an SMSF from conducting a business, the activities of the SMSF trustee must not contravene super law provisions, including:

  • The sole purpose test. The purpose of an SMSF is to provide retirement benefits or retirement related benefits for its members and their dependants. So, if an SMSF is conducting a business, it could be perceived that the money in the fund is being used to provide a current-day benefit to its members instead of it being there for their retirement.
  • Investment strategy. An SMSF trustee must formulate and give effect to an investment strategy. This means the nature of the business activities and the manner in which they are conducted must be in accordance with the investment strategy of the SMSF.
  • Lending. An SMSF trustee is prohibited from lending money or providing financial assistance to members and relatives. Therefore, the business activities must not involve selling an asset of the SMSF for less than its market value; purchasing an asset for greater than its market value; acquiring services in excess of what is required; or paying an inflated price for services acquired from members or relatives.
  • Borrowing. An SMSF must not draw upon a bank overdraft or margin lending product to fund its business activities nor can it borrow money for the business by taking out a mortgage over the SMSF’s assets.
  • Arm’s length investments. An SMSF must not employ a member or a relative in the business at a salary higher than the going rate.

Of course, many of these contraventions now come with steep penalties imposed by the regulator.

A share trading business in an SMSF

If a person is an ordinary share holder then the cost of purchasing shares is not an allowable deduction, and the losses from sales of shares cannot be offset against the income of the SMSF but is instead offset against capital gains received from the sale of those shares. On the other hand if a person is a share trader, they can treat the shares as trading stock and claim deductions for costs incurred in buying and selling shares.

The Australian Taxation Office will determine which category a person belongs to on a case-by-case basis. The general rule is that a share trader is classed as someone who is undertaking business activities for the purpose of earning an income from buying and selling shares. It is the volume and frequency of transactions that is important and not necessarily the amount of capital invested. Other important factors would include things such as evidence of a business plan and keeping records in a business-like manner.

Nevertheless, what people need to be aware of is that a law was introduced in June 2012 that abolished trading stock exceptions for SMSFs. This law limits the ability of SMSFs to pass gains and losses from certain assets (e.g. shares, units, land) through the revenue account. Gains and losses are treated in accordance with the capital gains tax provisions. However, if an SMSF did hold assets as trading stock prior to 10 May 2011 then it can continue to be taxed on revenue account.

So whether an SMSF is conducting a share trading business or not, all share trading activities of the SMSF will now be treated as an investment and the capital gains tax provisions will apply. If you were thinking of a share trading business solely as a way of avoiding capital gains tax then you will need to rethink your plans.

 

Monica Rule worked for the ATO for 28 years and is the author of the book titled “The Self Managed Super Handbook – Superannuation Law for Self Managed Super Funds in plain English” www.monicarule.com.au

 

5 Comments
Shawn
January 09, 2023

Peter Munns, I'm pretty sure that your proposed scheme would be a violation of the sole purpose test. Firstly, the fund would not be able to pay rates to the landowner, if the landowner is a trustee/member. This would violate the sole purpose test because benefits are being conferred to the member before retirement in the form of the rates.

Also, even if the land was not owned by the member, it would likely still violate the sole purpose test in that you are running a business, and the business provides you with some benefits. For example, it could be argued that you're achieving employment through the operation, paid or not.

The other issue has to do with "non-arms length income and expenditure" or NALI and NALE. You would be providing your services as a grazer to the fund. The ATO views this as the fund basically receiving freebies, which is a way to contravene the rules about contributions to super.

However, do check with your accountant of course before making a decision.

Scoota
October 30, 2015

Can our SMSF purchase a business and we run it without drawing a wage (all profit after running ocsts to go inot the smsf)?

Sam Naidu
March 05, 2015

Can an SMSF run a business? What about investing in an agricultural land which has cattle and farming business.

ian fanning mipa
March 07, 2015

The super legislation does not ban the running of a business. The sole purpose test would still need to be met. A simple way to run a cattle operation would be to have the Superfund own the land and charge agistment at market rates to the usual operating entity.

Peter Munns
December 12, 2022

Would it be possible on the other hand for the SMSF to own the cattle and related infrastructure, and pay agistment at market rates to the land owner (who is also a trustee / member)?

I don't see an issue if all the tests are met. I simply want to utilise the capital in my super fund to own a grazing operation. I am not driven to borrow, seek high rents or seek a massive salary. I am happy to not even pay myself from the grazing operation. It will make money by buying and fattening cattle (and sheep) on the grass on my farm, and sell them to market. Also some breeding.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: watch traps in EOFY contributions

Meg on SMSFs: Adjusting to the new tax on super over $3 million

Meg on SMSFs: Total Super Balance quirks unpacked

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.